BackgroundThere are controversies about platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an established treatment option for rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy. The purpose of the study was to find the relation of cellular component with clinical efficacy in RC tendinopathy and to find the composition of PRP in treating RC tendinopathy.MethodsA total 30 patients were recruited and divided into PRP and control groups. In the PRP group, 2 ml of PRP solution was injected to the hypoechoic lesion of degenerative supraspinatus via 22-gauge syringe with peppering technique. Patients in the control group were taught rotator cuff strengthening exercises. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley score, and numeric rating scale (NRS) were measured before, 6 weeks after, 12 weeks after, and 24 weeks after the procedure. PRP compositions were analyzed using the 1 ml of PRP solution.ResultsLinear regression analysis showed no significant difference of ASES and Constant-Murley scores between the groups at 6 weeks (P = 0.582 and 0.258) and at 12 weeks (P = 0.969 and 0.795) but showed a significant difference at 24 weeks (P = 0.050 and 0.048). Independent t test showed significant group difference of NRS at 6 weeks (P = 0.031) but not at 12 and 24 weeks (P = 0.147 and 0.935). 5.19 pg/ml in IL-1β and 61.79 μg/ml in TGF-β1 were acquired as cutoff values to predict meaningful improvement. The PRP subgroup above IL-1β or TGF-β1 cutoff value showed significant differences in all clinical outcomes compared with the exercise group while the PRP subgroup below the cutoff value showed no significant differences in linear regression analysis.ConclusionsOur study can help to find the optimal PRP condition and to enhance the effect of PRP on RC tendinopathy.Trial registrationAll the patients were registered in our Institutional Ethics Committee (approval number 2014-05-009).
Background Patients with breast cancer typically experience changes in the properties of muscles around the shoulder. However, there is no appropriate evaluation tool for these changes. Objective The primary objective was to investigate the inter‐rater and intra‐rater reliability of muscle‐related parameters measured by the MyotonPRO, a myotonometer device. The secondary objective was to investigate differences in properties of muscle around the shoulder between the mastectomy side and the other side. Design Cross‐sectional reliability study. Setting Outpatient clinic in a tertiary care university‐affiliated hospital. Participants Twenty‐two patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy. Methods Muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity of the pectoralis major (PM), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), and upper trapezius (UT) were measured using the MyotonPRO. Rater 1 performed two sets of measurements with a time interval of 30 minutes to determine intra‐rater reliability. Rater 2 performed measurements during the interval between the two sets of rater 1. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland‐Altman analysis. A paired t‐test was used to compare muscle properties between the affected and unaffected sides. Main Outcome Measurements Frequency (tone, Hz), stiffness (N/m), and decrement (elasticity). Results Intra‐rater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.75, 0.85‐0.98) for all parameters of the PM, SCM, and UT in the affected and unaffected upper limbs of patients with breast cancer. Inter‐rater reliability was fair to excellent for all parameters except unaffected PM elasticity (ICC = 0.34). There were significant differences in all parameters of the PM between the affected and unaffected sides. There were no significant differences in the parameters of the SCM and UT between the two sides. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the MyotonPRO device is a feasible tool to quantify PM, UT, and SCM muscle properties (stiffness, tone, and elasticity) in patients with breast cancer. Level of Evidence III.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.