Aims The clinical manifestation and outcomes of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) after adenoviral COVID-19 vaccine administration are largely unknown due to the rare nature of the disease. We aimed to analyse the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, outcomes, and prognostic factors of adenoviral TTS, as well as identify predictors for mortality. Methods and Results PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched and the resulting articles were reviewed. A total of 6 case series and 13 case reports (64 patients) of TTS after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination were included. We performed a pooled analysis and developed a novel scoring system to predict mortality. The overall mortality of TTS after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination was 35.9% (23/64). In our analysis, age ≤60 years, platelet count <25 × 103/µL, fibrinogen <150 mg/dL, the presence of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and the presence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) were significantly associated with death and were selected as predictors for mortality (1 point each). We named this novel scoring system FAPIC (fibrinogen, age, platelet count, ICH, and CVT), and the C-statistic for the FAPIC score was 0.837 (95% CI 0.732–0.942). Expected mortality increased with each point increase in the FAPIC score, at 2.08, 6.66, 19.31, 44.54, 72.94, and 90.05% with FAPIC scores 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The FAPIC scoring model was internally validated through cross-validation and bootstrapping, then externally validated on a panel of TTS patients after Ad26.COV2.S administration. Conclusions Fibrinogen levels, age, platelet count, and the presence of ICH and CVT were significantly associated with mortality in patients with TTS, and the FAPIC score comprising these risk factors could predict mortality. The FAPIC score could be used in the clinical setting to recognize TTS patients at high risk of adverse outcomes and provide early intensive interventions including intravenous immunoglobulins and non-heparin anticoagulants.

No abstract

Purpose To develop a system for assessment of tumor regression grade (TRG) with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging that is applicable to rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMAC) and to obtain a preliminary evaluation of the association of MR imaging assessment of TRG with response to preoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT). Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. Pre- and post-CCRT MR images of 59 patients with RMAC (median age, 59 years; range, 29-80 years; 42 men [median age, 59 years; range, 36-80 years] and 17 women [median age, 57 years; range, 29-79 years]) who underwent CCRT and subsequent elective resection from July 2005 to June 2015 were analyzed. Two experienced gastrointestinal radiologists independently analyzed imaging parameters such as T stage, mesorectal fascia status, extramural vascular invasion status, and TRG by using modified criteria developed for assessment of RMAC. Interobserver variability was calculated with weighted κ analysis, and disagreement was settled in consensus. MR imaging TRG results were compared with those from pathologic TRG analysis (Mandard grade). Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between imaging parameters and pathologic TRG. Results There was moderate to substantial agreement for imaging parameters (post-CCRT T stage-weighted κ, 0.7134; post-CCRT mesorectal fascia status, 0.618; TRG, 0.5023). Modified MR imaging TRG results were significantly associated with pathologic responsiveness (responsive group, Mandard grade 1 or 2; nonresponsive group, Mandard grades 3-5; P = .023). Results of univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that MR imaging TRG was the only factor significantly associated with CCRT responsiveness (univariate analysis, P = .023; multivariate analysis, P = .0261). Conclusion The modified MR imaging assessment of TRG was associated with treatment response to CCRT in patients with RMAC. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The imaging features of HAC liver metastasis were varied. Arterial phase enhancement coupled with venous phase washout (resembling HCC imaging features) was a major finding, but arterial phase hypo-enhancement (distinct from HCC imaging features) was also frequently encountered.

In-stent restenosis (ISR) often occurs after applying drug eluting stents to the blood vessels suffering from atherosclerosis or thrombosis. For treatment of ISR, drug eluting balloons (DEB) have been developed to deliver anti-proliferative drugs to the lesions with ISR. However, there are still limitations of DEB such as low drug delivery efficiency and drug loss to blood flow. Although most researches have focused on alteration of drug formulation for more efficient drug delivery, there are few studies that have attempted to understand and utilize the contact modality of DEB drug delivery. Here, we developed a linear micro-patterned DEB (LMDEB) that applied higher contact pressure to enhance drug stamping to vascular tissue. Ex vivo and in vivo studies confirmed that higher contact pressure from micro-patterns increased the amount of drug delivered to the deeper regions of vessel. Finite element method simulation also showed significant increase of contact pressure between endothelium and micro-patterns. Quantitative analysis by high performance liquid chromatography indicated that LMDEBs delivered 2.3 times higher amount of drug to vascular tissue in vivo than conventional DEBs. Finally, efficacy studies using both atherosclerotic and ISR models demonstrated superior patency of diseased vessels treated with LMDEB compared to those treated with DEB.

Background The recently emerged novel coronavirus, “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2)”, caused a highly contagious disease called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). It has severely damaged the world's most developed countries and has turned into a major threat for low‐ and middle‐income countries. Since its emergence in late 2019, medical interventions have been substantial, and most countries relied on public health measures collectively known as nonpharmaceutical interventions. Aims To centralize the accumulative knowledge on non‐pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against COVID‐19 for each country under one worldwide consortium. Methods International COVID‐19 Research Network collaborators developed a cross‐sectional online‐survey to assess the implications of NPIs and sanitary supply on incidence and mortality of COVID‐19. Survey was conducted between January 1 and February 1, 2021, and participants from 92 countries/territories completed it. The association between NPIs, sanitation supplies and incidence and mortality were examined by multivariate regression, with log‐transformed value of population as an offset value. Results Majority of countries/territories applied several preventive strategies including social distancing (100.0%), quarantine (100.0%), isolation (98.9%), and school closure (97.8%). Individual‐level preventive measures such as personal hygiene (100.0%) and wearing facial mask (94.6% at hospital; 93.5% at mass transportation; 91.3% in mass gathering facilities) were also frequently applied. Quarantine at a designated place was negatively associated with incidence and mortality compared to home quarantine. Isolation at a designated place was also associated with reduced mortality compared to home isolation. Recommendations to use sanitizer for personal hygiene reduced incidence compared to recommendation to use soap did. Deprivation of mask was associated with increased incidence. Higher incidence and mortality were found in countries/territories with higher economic level. Mask deprivation was pervasive regardless of economic level. Conclusion NPIs against COVID‐19 such as using sanitizer, quarantine, and isolation can decrease incidence and mortality of COVID‐19. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

No abstract

Aims: Methodological rigour enhances reproducibility in preclinical studies and translation from preclinical to clinical studies. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and the trends of essential study design elements in preclinical urological studies, as well as key factors which may improve methodological rigour. Methods and Results: PubMed database was searched, and all the resulting articles in preclinical urological articles published over the past 14-years were reviewed. Total 3768 articles met inclusion criteria. Data on study design elements and animal model used were collected. Citation density and journal impact factor was also examined as a surrogate marker of study influence. We performed analysis on prevalence of seven critical study design elements, and temporal patterns over 14 years. Randomization was reported in 50.0%, blinding in 15.0%, sample size estimation in 1.0%, inclusion of both sexes in 5.7%, statistical analysis in 97.1%, housing and husbandry in 47.7%, and inclusion/exclusion criteria in 5.0%. Temporal analysis showed that the implementation of these study design elements has increased, except for inclusion of both sexes and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Reporting study design elements were not associated with increased citation density. Conclusions: The risk of bias is prevalent in 14-year publications describing preclinical urological research, and the quality of methodological rigour is poorly related to the journal impact factor or the citation of the article. Yet guidelines seem helpful in improving the research quality, because five study design elements (randomization, blinding, sample size estimation, statistical analysis, housing and husbandry) proposed by both NIH and ARRIVE guidelines have been either well reported or improved. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022233125 One-sentence summary: Research bias still exists in the fields in preclinical urology, but it is gradually improving.