The study deals with peculiarities of hydration and development of hardening structure as well as durability properties pertaining to composite anhydrite cement pozzolana binder (ACP) with different pozzolana (P). The properties of P have an effect on ACP hydration, structure development and durability properties. This effect is different than that in cement pastes. Investigations were performed with known P: natural opoka (O) and microsilica (MS), also with production waste of mineral wool – cupola dust (CD), which is famous for high fineness and amorphous structure of particles. It was established that the activity of P compounds contained in CD was very high making this waste suitable for ACP as a P component. In ACCD samples, one could observe the most intense hydration; and after a longer inductive period, the development of hardening microstructure was more rapid than in ACMS or ACO; furthermore, a remarkably higher strength was reached. The slowest hydration and structure compacting as well as the lowest strength were found in ACMS samples. It shows that the high pozzolanic activity of P is not the crucial index in evaluation of its effect on ACP properties. Chemical properties of P have a remarkably greater effect; and in case of CD, it is most likely due to reactive alkaline admixtures.
The classification and grouping of materials investigation according to raw material's nature and product purpose (use) was conducted by using comparative material energetic usefulness and its production ecobalance analytical methods. Energy expenditures and pollution emissions into the environment were studied and compared to analogical purpose materials. One of the most economically perspective technogenic waste ‐ extractive hemihydrate phosphogypsum was investigated. Two technological production streams of phosphogypsum were studied. It was found, that the energy needs for production of analogical purpose materials (wall partitions) differ significantly. The nature of raw materials has an influence on energetic usefulness. The most effective materials according to their nature, energetic usefulness and environmental protection are mineral ones, especially if they are made with technogenic inorganic waste materials. The best results, from the energetic and ecological point of view, are obtained by using the waste raw material ‐ extractive hemihydrate phosphogypsum. Its reprocessing energy expenditures and pollutant emissions into the environment are several times less, than for other analogical purpose and properties wall materials, also with less environmental pollution. Products made from reprocessing extractive hemihydrate phosphogypsum can replace other energy consuming articles for wall partitions. Santrauka Klasifikuojant ir grupuojant medžiagas pagal žaliavų kilmę ir gaminių paskirtį atlikti lyginamieji medžiagų energinio naudingumo ir jų gamybos ekobalanso analitiniai tyrimai. Nagrinėtos ir lygintos energijos sąnaudos ir teršalų patekimas į aplinką analogiškos paskirties medžiagoms gauti. Tirtos vienos iš perspektyviausių ekonomoniu ir ekologiniu požiūriu technogeninės atliekos – ekstrakcinio pushidračio fosfogipso (E-PG) savybės. Nustatyta, kad energijos poreikis gaminant analogiškos paskirties medžiagas iš esmės skiriasi. Žaliavos kilmė turi įtaką produkcijos energiniam naudingumui. Efektyviausios pagal kilmę energinio naudingumo ir aplinkosaugos požiūriu yra mineralinės medžiagos, ypač jeigu jos pagamintos iš technogeninių neorganinių atliekų. Geriausi rezultatai energiniu ir ekologiniu požiūriu gauti naudojant atliekų žaliavą – E-PG. Jo perdirbimo energijos sąnaudos ir teršalų emisija į aplinką yra kelis kartus mažesnės, negu gaminant kitas analogiškos paskirties ir savybių sienines medžiagas, be to, mažėja aplinkos tarša. Ateityje gaminiai iš perdirbto E-PG galėtų pakeisti pastatų atitvaroms naudojamus keraminius, silikatinius ir kitus energijai imlius dirbinius.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.