Human herpesvirus-8 (HHV8)-positive effusion-based lymphomas have been termed primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) in the WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV)/ HHV8-negative effusion-based lymphomas (KSHV/HHV8-negative EBLs) resembling PELs have been reported in the literature and in many cases have been (mis)classified as PEL-like lymphomas. Herein, we present a series of cases and a review of KSHV/HHV8-negative EBLs. This lymphoma, although cytomorphologically resembling PEL, is a distinct entity with characteristic clinical and pathologic features. Patients are older, generally human immunodeficiency virus negative and not immunosuppressed, frequently hepatitis C positive compared with the population baseline, and often have an underlying medical condition leading to fluid overload. The lymphoma cells express pan-B-cell antigens in 86.7%, and CD20 is expressed in 71.1% of the cases. The lymphoma is often of germinal center B or mixed germinal center B/activated B-cell signature with the Hans classifier, and Epstein-Barr virus is positive in nearly 30% of cases. Rare T-cell lymphomas were also reported. Clinical outcomes and response to therapy, including isolated aspiration, are relatively favorable compared with cases of PEL. We suggest that HHV8-negative effusion-based lymphoma is a distinct entity associated with fluid overload states.

A 58-year-old woman presented with a 15-year history of an itchy skin eruption that started on her trunk and subsequently spread to her extremities. She reported having had multiple

BACKGROUND ProEx C is an antibody cocktail targeting the expression of topoisomerase IIα and minichromosome maintenance protein‐2. ProEx C staining is being used to assist in diagnoses of the gynecological specimens. This study was designed to determine the utility of ProEx C in urine cytology samples for improving the detection of urothelial carcinomas where a significant number of urine cytology specimens are diagnosed as “atypia.” METHODS Sixty urinary specimens (12 negative, 13 positive, and 35 atypical cases) were stained with ProEx C, and ProEx C results were recorded as positive when nuclear staining was only seen in at least one morphologically atypical urothelial cell. RESULTS All 12 benign cytology samples showed negative staining with ProEx C. Twelve of 13 cases that had a malignant cytologic diagnosis showed a positive nuclear staining of the malignant cells. Eighteen of 35 cases with atypical cytologic diagnoses showed positive nuclear staining. Of the 35 cases with “atypia,” 17 had a malignant histopathologic follow‐up. In this study, ProEx C stain had an overall sensitivity of 78.4%, specificity of 95.7%%, positive predictive value of 96.7%, and negative predictive value of 73.3% for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS ProEx C stain is a useful adjunct test to urine cytologic analysis, even in specimens with limited cellularity. In urinary smears, this test is most useful in stratification of the “atypical” diagnoses into benign and malignant subsets. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study of ProEx C application in urine cytology as an adjunct marker for detection of urothelial carcinoma. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2013;121:320–8. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

No abstract

No abstract