No abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to compare the osseous reactions elicited by all-suture, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and two different biodegradable anchors used during rotator cuff repair. Patients and Methods Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair was performed in 73 patients. The patients were divided into two groups, in both of which two different medial-row anchors were used. In group 1, anchor A comprised 30% β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) + 70% fast-absorbing poly lactic-co-glycolic acid copolymer (85% polylactic acid enantiomers + 15% polyglycolic acid) and anchor B comprised all-sutures. In group 2, anchor C comprised 23% micro β-TCP + 77% polylactic acid enantiomers and anchor D comprised PEEK polymer. There were 37 patients in group 1 and 36 patients in group 2. The presence and severity of fluid collection around anchors and healing of the rotator cuff were assessed using MRI scans, approximately one year postoperatively. The severity of the collection was graded as 0 (no perianchor fluid signal), 1 (minimal perianchor fluid), 2 (local collection of fluid), 3 (fluid collection around the whole length of the anchor but of a diameter less than twice the anchor diameter), or 4 (fluid collection around the whole length of the anchor and of a diameter greater than twice the anchor diameter). Results A perianchor fluid signal was seen in three patients (8.1%) with anchor A, four (10.8%) with anchor B, 15 (41.7%) with anchor C, and 15 (41.7%) with anchor D. The severity of the collection around anchor was grade 2:1:0:0 for anchor A, grade 2:2:0:0 for anchor B, grade 12:2:0:1 for anchor C, and grade 11:3:0:1 for anchor D (grade 1:2:3:4, respectively). The prevalence and severity of fluid formation was not significantly different between anchors A and B, and anchors C and D. However, on intergroup analysis, there were significant differences for the prevalence and severity of fluid formation between anchors in group 1 and group 2. The prevalence of failure to heal was not significant in group 1 (seven, 18.9%) or group 2 (nine, 25.0%). There was no relationship between the presence of perianchor fluid and each type of anchor, and the integrity of the rotator cuff repair, in either group. Conclusion Despite the nonabsorbable nature of all-suture and PEEK anchors, all-suture anchors produced less osseous reaction after rotator cuff repair. In deciding which kind of anchor to use, consideration should be given not only to the strength of the initial fixation, but also to the postoperative biological reaction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1506–1511

Glomus coccygeum is a network of glomus bodies located around pericoccygeal soft tissue. The question of whether it accounts for coccydynia has been debated. We report on a patient whose preoperative symptoms suggested the impression of glomus tumor of the coccyx; pain was relieved after removal of the lesion without coccygectomy. A 57-year-old woman was referred to us with a history of a pain in the coccygeal area lasting longer than 3 years. The patient complained of sharp pain whenever pressure was applied to the coccyx. Pain was aggravated by exposure to cold. MRI revealed a coccygeal lesion measuring 2 cm with a well-circumscribed margin. The lesion was excised without removal of any portion of the coccyx. The pathology report confirmed a glomus tumor, which was an identical finding to the conventional one of the subungual region. Ten months after surgery, she had no pain on the coccygeal region and no difficulty with sitting on a chair and in performing activities of daily living. Findings reported here suggest that although most glomus bodies are normal anatomical variants, development of a glomus tumor could occur in the coccygeal region and could be a cause of coccydynia.

Purpose This study was to evaluate the eicacy and safety of coracohumeral ligament (CHL) release from the coracoid process concomitant with arthroscopic rotator cuf repair for preventing postoperative stifness. Methods Data on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuf repair with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were collected retrospectively. Propensity score matching (1-to-1) was performed between a no-releasing group (Group I) and CHL-releasing group (Group II). In total, 76 patients in each group were matched. Clinical outcomes were assessed and compared between the two groups, including range of motion (ROM) and visual analogue scale for pain (pVAS) at postoperative 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The integrity of the repaired tendon was assessed at 1-year follow-up using either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography. Results External rotation (ER) at side at postoperative 3 months in Group II was better than that in Group I (48.6° ± 11.6° vs. 38.4° ± 13.0°, P < 0.001). When evaluating only patients with a small-to-medium sized tear at postoperative 3 months, ER at side was 49.8° ± 10.9° in Group II versus 37.8° ± 13.1° in Group I (P < 0.001). In patients with a large-to-massive sized tear, however, there was no signiicant diference in ER at side at postoperative 3 months (n.s.). There was no signiicant diference in ROM and functional scores at postoperative 6 months and 1 year, and there was no signiicant diference in healing failure rate (6 cases in Group I (7.9%), 2 cases in Group II (2.6%); n.s.). No complications of the CHL release procedure occurred. Conclusions In arthroscopic rotator cuf repair, CHL release from the coracoid process without creating a rotator interval defect could be an efective and safe method to prevent early postoperative stifness, especially ER at side in patients with a small-to-medium sized tear. Therefore, CHL release can be used as a selective procedure to prevent postoperative stifness in patients that may beneit from this procedure with decreased preoperative ER compared to the normal side. Level of evidence Level III.

Background: In general, the outcomes of arthroscopic repair for superior labrum anterior to posterior lesions (SLAP) are favorable, however, persistent pain and limitation of motion are not rare complications. One of the possible cause is a "knot-ache". This study evaluated the results of reoperation of symptomatic recurrent SLAP lesions and asked whether the knot is associated with postoperative complications. Methods: Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 11 patients who had undergone arthroscopic SLAP repair were reoperated for recurrent symptomatic SLAP lesion. By retrospective chart review, operative findings, the visual analogue scale for pain (pVAS), the range of motion (ROM), and functional scores were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 38.3 years, and the mean follow-up period was 42.5 months. In the primary operation, there were nine cases of repairs with conventional knot-tying anchors and three cases with knotless anchors. Impingement of the knots during abduction and external rotation of the shoulder was observed in the all cases with knot-tying anchors. The mean pVAS, ROM, and functional scores significantly improved with reoperation. At the final follow-up, the mean satisfaction VAS was 8.3. Conclusions: The knots of suture anchor maybe a possible etiology of the pain, which we termed a "knot-ache". Considering that reoperation is performed due to pain after primary repair, the use of knotless suture anchor may have benefits of eliminating one of possible cause, "knot-ache". Therefore, authors suggest the use of knotless anchors during reoperation for recurrent or recalcitrant pain after primary SLAP repair. (Clin Shoulder Elbow 2017;20(2):68-76)

No abstract

No abstract

The usefulness and accuracy of computer-assisted surgery have been evaluated clinically in many orthopedic fields, including joint replacement arthroplasty, pedicle screw placement, and cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee joint. Since several preliminary reports on application of navigation to bone tumor resection and reconstruction surgery have recently been issued, navigation-assisted surgery for bone tumors has received significant attention with regard to its usefulness. In particular, navigation can be helpful during surgery for musculoskeletal tumors, because it can maximize the accuracy of resection and minimize the unnecessary sacrifice of normal tissue by providing precise intraoperative three-dimensional radiological information. In addition, it is helpful in prosthetic reconstruction, because preoperative virtual simulation makes it possible to estimate size and location of bone defect to be left after tumor resection. Surgeons should recognize that use of navigation systems in bone tumor surgery has some hidden pitfalls. Here, based on our clinical results, we describe the surgical techniques that we have used and include some cautionary notes.