There are a variety of NMDAR antagonist agents that should be considered for treatment of NeuP. Nevertheless, continued and further investigation of the 8 pharmacologic agents is needed to continue to evaluate their efficacy for treatment of NeuP.
Clinical studies demonstrate that buprenorphine is a pharmacologic agent that can be used for the treatment of various types of painful conditions. This study investigated the efficacy of 5 different types of buprenorphine formulations in the chronic pain population. The literature was reviewed on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, clinicaltrials.gov, and PROSPERO that dated from inception until June 30, 2017. Using the population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes method, 25 randomized controlled trials were reviewed involving 5 buprenorphine formulations in patients with chronic pain: intravenous buprenorphine, sublingual buprenorphine, sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone, buccal buprenorphine, and transdermal buprenorphine, with comparators consisting of opioid analgesics or placebo. Of the 25 studies reviewed, a total of 14 studies demonstrated clinically significant benefit with buprenorphine in the management of chronic pain: 1 study out of 6 sublingual and intravenous buprenorphine, the only sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone study, 2 out of 3 studies of buccal buprenorphine, and 10 out of 15 studies for transdermal buprenorphine showed significant reduction in pain against a comparator. No serious adverse effects were reported in any of the studies. We conclude that a transdermal buprenorphine formulation is an effective analgesic in patients with chronic pain, while buccal buprenorphine is also a promising formulation based on the limited number of studies.
Persistent postsurgical pain (PPP) is defined as the discomfort that lasts >3 months postoperatively. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to estimate the risk of developing moderate-to-severe PPP after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary goal was to explore potential predictors of this outcome.
Data were collected via hospital arthroplasty registry and chart review. The risk of moderate-to-severe PPP, defined as ≥4 on the numerical rating scale (NRS) at minimum of 3 months post-surgery, was calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association of patient demographics, diagnoses, length of hospital stay, and preoperative NRS with the odds of developing PPP. Exploratory, simple logistic regression was used to estimate the association of perioperative factors with the odds of developing PPP on a subset of patients (n = 72).
The risk of PPP after TKA was 31.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.5–35.0) (n = 578). Every 2-point increase in baseline NRS was associated with 1.66 (95% CI: 1.37–2.03) times the odds of developing PPP (
P
< .001). African-Americans (vs whites) had 1.82 (95% CI: 1.03–3.22) times the odds of developing PPP (
P
= .040). Exploratory analysis suggested that the adductor canal saphenous nerve (vs femoral nerve) blocks were associated with 2.87 (95% CI: 1.00–8.26) times the odds of developing PPP (
P
= .049).
This study estimated a high risk (31.3%) of moderate-to-severe PPP after primary TKA. This study suggested that higher preoperative pain scores might be associated with greater odds of developing PPP. Moreover, this study suggested the possibility that racial differences and types of peripheral nerve blocks might be associated with greater odds of developing moderate-to-severe PPP after TKA surgery. However, the evidence obtained from our exploratory analysis of limited data certainly requires further exploration in large-scale studies.
While there is some evidence of efficacy, due to the relatively small number of patients in each study, further research is needed to demonstrate the benefits of SCS for PLP.
Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease that is secondary to degradation of articular cartilage, reformation of subchondral bone through degradation and proliferation as well as presence of synovitis. Materials & methods: This systematic review was conducted and reported as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Results: A total of 30 of the 48 comparators showed statistically significant superiority with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) compared with a control, while the other 16 comparators showed no significant difference between PRP and the comparator. Conclusion: We can only recommend PRP for patients with early-stage osteoarthritis (I or II) and who are aged below 65, based on our findings. Based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) recommendations, while studies reviewed were randomized controlled studies, and therefore, high grade, due to variance in imprecision, risk of bias and inconsistency among the 37 studies, it would be reasonable to rate this paper as subjectively moderate.
This is the first reported case of an epidural hematoma on the contralateral side of the dura at a distance from the needle tip location, in the setting of severe central canal stenosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.