No abstract

Background Dermatology consultations in the inpatient hospital setting can improve diagnostic accuracy and management. Objective Characterize dermatologic diagnostic and treatment trends in the hospital setting and identify variables that may affect patient care. Methods Retrospective chart review from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2017 at Jackson Memorial Hospital (JMH) (Miami, Florida, USA), an academic non‐profit tertiary care centre affiliated with University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, was performed. Patients who received dermatology consultations in the emergency department (ED) or inpatient settings were included. Patient demographics, admission information, provisional diagnosis and management plans by primary teams, final diagnosis, management plans and testing recommendations by the dermatology consults team, and follow‐up information were collected. Analysis using Microsoft Excel of how time to consultation, admission length, inpatient versus ED setting and primary team affected diagnostic accuracy was also performed. Results The 1004 consultations for 812 patients (n = 812) were reviewed (359 women, 453 men). Most patients were Hispanic (n = 359; 44.2%) or African American (n = 273; 33.6%). Mean admission length was 20.6 days (range 0–439; median 6). The most common consulting service was internal medicine (n = 452). In 387 cases (47.6%), primary teams did not give a provisional diagnosis. The most common provisional diagnoses were bacterial infection (n = 93), viral infection (n = 49) and drug reaction (n = 44). The most common diagnoses by dermatology were viral infection (n = 93), bacterial infection (n = 90) and drug reaction (n = 80). Dermatology consultation changed the provisional diagnosis in 55.7% of cases, more often in cases where consultation took place ≥2 days after admission (P < 0.05). Primary teams followed dermatology treatment recommendations in 85.2% of cases. Conclusion Dermatology consultation improves diagnostic accuracy in skin disorders in the hospital setting and serves as a valuable resource for inpatient care. A notable aspect of data from this study is the unique patient population, predominantly comprised of underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities including Hispanics and African Americans.

Kyrle's disease (KD) is a cutaneous disease that develops in individuals with underlying systemic disease, particularly chronic renal failure and diabetes mellitus (DM), and is associated with a high burden of disease linked to itch. The intensely pruritic, hyperkeratotic papulonodular rash seen in KD dramatically impairs patients’ quality of life and increases their risk of mortality. Unfortunately, no guidelines or evidence‐based regimens have been specifically developed for KD, making the treatment of this disease particularly challenging for physicians. This article aims to provide the first comprehensive, up‐to‐date overview and analysis of treatment options employed for KD. A search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was performed for articles regarding the treatment of KD, published in English between 1990 and 2019. Seventy‐three articles were identified, of which eighteen met the inclusion criteria. We discovered that a wide variety of treatment regimens for KD have been reported in the literature, including oral antibiotics, immunosuppressants, phototherapy, topical/systemic retinoids, topical keratolytics and various combination therapies, which include some of the aforementioned treatments, in conjunction with oral/topical/injectable steroids, emollients and/or antihistamines. The use of a combination regimen is the most commonly practiced therapeutic approach to KD. Topical corticosteroids and depot corticosteroid injections repeatedly appeared in many of the regimens encountered during our search. While no definitive recommendations can be made based on existing literature, this article provides physicians with a summative outline that can help guide management and be referenced when other treatment efforts fail. The increasing prevalence of renal disease, DM and other chronic diseases will inevitably lead to rising rates of KD in the upcoming years. While randomized controlled trials are greatly needed, novel antipruritic immunomodulatory drugs targeting specific interleukin receptors (IL‐4/13/31) and intracellular signalling (e.g. Janus kinase) pathways may have a potential role in the treatment of this disease.

No abstract

No abstract

Wound care is a multidisciplinary field with significant economic burden to our healthcare system. Not only does wound care cost the US healthcare system $20 billion annually, but wounds also remarkably impact the quality of life of patients; wounds pose significant risk of mortality, as the five-year mortality rate for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and ischemic ulcers is notably higher compared to commonly encountered cancers such as breast and prostate. Although it is important to measure how wounds may or may not be improving over time, the only relative “marker” for this is wound area measurement—area measurements can help providers determine if a wound is on a healing or non-healing trajectory. Because wound area measurements are currently the only readily available “gold standard” for predicting healing outcomes, there is a pressing need to understand how other relative biomarkers may play a role in wound healing. Currently, wound care centers across the nation employ various techniques to obtain wound area measurements; length and width of a wound can be measured with a ruler, but this carries a high amount of inter- and intrapersonal error as well as uncertainty. Acetate tracings could be used to limit the amount of error but do not account for depth, thereby making them inaccurate. Here, we discuss current imaging modalities and how they can serve to accurately measure wound size and serve as useful adjuncts in wound assessment. Moreover, new imaging modalities are also discussed and how up-and-coming technologies can provide important information on “biomarkers” for wound healing.

No abstract

In countries other than the United States, the BCG vaccine is typically used as a method for preventing childhood tuberculosis; in the United States, the BCG vaccine has gained popularity as a speculated therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Research suggests that the vaccine can train the innate immune response, thereby improving symptoms of disorders such as diabetes and fibromyalgia. However, the potential side effects associated with the use of this vaccine are not totally innocuous. Although 95% of recipients should expect common skin complications after administration of the BCG vaccine, other more serious cutaneous sequelae may occur. Potential cutaneous side effects associated with vaccine use can include fistulation, abscess formation, and even ulceration. This brief report highlights a patient in whom cutaneous tuberculosis developed, specifically tuberculous chancre, secondary to receiving the BCG vaccine as a possible treatment for fibromyalgia. After undergoing surgical debulking of the tumor, the patient subsequently received the standard of care to the wound base and was started on 6 months of isoniazid monotherapy. Cutaneous tuberculosis is exceedingly rare, and the chancre variant accounts for only about 1% of diagnosed cases. Although common in pediatric populations, the chancre variant of cutaneous tuberculosis is not typically seen in adult populations, most likely because the BCG vaccine is often administered to children to prevent childhood tuberculosis. As use of the BCG vaccine in adults becomes more prevalent to potentially treat or mitigate certain disorders, it is imperative that health care providers recognize the potentially severe side effects associated with its use.