Poor outcomes in COVID‐19 correlate with clinical and laboratory features of cytokine storm syndrome. Broad screening for cytokine storm and early, targeted antiinflammatory therapy may prevent immunopathology and could help conserve limited health care resources. While studies are ongoing, extrapolating from clinical experience in cytokine storm syndromes may benefit the multidisciplinary teams caring for patients with severe COVID‐19.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by immune dysregulation in both scalp and blood, but a large-scale approach establishing biomarkers of AA incorporating both scalp tissue and serum compartments is lacking. We aimed to characterize the transcriptomic signature of AA lesional and nonlesional scalp compared to healthy scalp and determine its relationship with the blood proteome in the same individuals, with comparative correlations to clinical AA disease severity. Methods:We evaluated lesional and nonlesional scalp tissues and serum from patients with moderate-to-severe AA (n = 18) and healthy individuals (n = 8). We assessed 33,118 genes in AA scalp tissue using RNAseq transcriptomic evaluation and 340 inflammatory proteins in serum using OLINK high-throughput proteomics.Univariate and multivariate approaches were used to correlate disease biomarkers with Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT).Results: A total of 608 inflammatory genes were differentially expressed in lesional AA scalp (fold change/FCH>1.5, false discovery rate/FDR<0.05) including Th1 (IFNG/ IL12B/CXCL11), Th2 (IL13/CCL18), and T-cell activation-related (ICOS) products.Th1/Th2-related markers were significantly correlated with AA clinical severity in lesional/nonlesional tissue, while keratins (KRT35/KRT83/KRT81) were significantly downregulated in lesional compared to healthy scalp (p < .05). Expression of cardiovascular/atherosclerosis-related markers (MMP9/CCL2/IL1RL1/IL33R/ST2/AGER) in lesional scalp correlated with their corresponding serum expression (p < .05). AA scalp demonstrated significantly greater biomarker dysregulation compared to blood. An integrated multivariate approach combining scalp and serum biomarkers improved correlations with disease severity/SALT. Conclusion:This study contributes a unique understanding of the phenotype of moderate-to-severe AA with an integrated scalp and serum biomarker model suggesting the systemic nature of the disease, advocating for the need for immune-based systemic treatment.

No abstract

Objective To compare clinical outcomes in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) who were managed before and after implementation of an evidence-based guideline (EBG). Methods A management algorithm for MAS-HLH was developed at our institution based on literature review, expert opinion, and consensus building across multiple pediatric subspecialties. An electronic medical record search retrospectively identified hospitalized patients with MAS-HLH in the pre-EBG (October 15, 2015, to December 4, 2017) and post-EBG (January 1, 2018, to January 21, 2020) time periods. Predetermined outcome metrics were evaluated in the 2 cohorts. Results After the EBG launch, 57 children were identified by house staff as potential patients with MAS-HLH, and rheumatology was consulted for management. Ultimately, 17 patients were diagnosed with MAS-HLH by the treating team. Of these, 59% met HLH 2004 criteria, and 94% met 2016 classification criteria for MAS complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. There was a statistically significant reduction in mortality from 50% before implementation of the EBG to 6% in the post-EBG cohort (P = 0.02). There was a significant improvement in time to 50% reduction in C-reactive protein level in the post-EBG vs pre-EBG cohorts (log-rank P < 0.01). There were trends toward faster time to MAS-HLH diagnosis, faster initiation of immunosuppressive therapy, shorter length of hospital stay, and more rapid normalization of MAS-HLH–related biomarkers in the patients post-EBG. Conclusion While the observed improvements may be partially attributed to advances in treatment of MAS-HLH that have accumulated over time, this analysis also suggests that a multidisciplinary treatment pathway for MAS-HLH contributed meaningfully to favorable patient outcomes.