PurposeRecent reports have highlighted the importance of an anatomic tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different tunnel positions for single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics.MethodsSixteen fresh-frozen cadaver knees were used. In one group (n = 8), the following techniques were used for knee surgery: (1) anteromedial (AM) bundle reconstruction (AM–AM), (2) posterolateral (PL) bundle reconstruction (PL–PL) and (3) conventional vertical single-bundle reconstruction (PL-high AM). In the other group (n = 8), anatomic mid-position single-bundle reconstruction (MID–MID) was performed. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor system was used to test the knees. An anterior load of 89 N was applied for anterior tibial translation (ATT) at 0°, 15°, 30° and 60° of knee flexion. Subsequently, a combined rotatory load (5 Nm internal rotation and 7 Nm valgus moment) was applied at 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° of knee flexion. The ATT and in situ forces during the application of the external loads were measured.ResultsCompared with the intact ACL, all reconstructed knees had a higher ATT under anterior load at all flexion angles and a lower in situ force during the anterior load at 60° of knee flexion. In the case of combined rotatory loading, the highest ATT was achieved with PL-high AM; the in situ force was most closely restored with MIDMID, and the in situ force was the highest AM–AM at each knee flexion angle.ConclusionAmong the techniques, AM–AM afforded the highest in situ force and the least ATT.

Attention has been focused on the importance of anatomical tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different tunnel positions for single-bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction on knee kinematics. Ten porcine knees were used for the following reconstruction techniques: three different anatomic SB [AM-AM (antero-medial), PL-PL (postero-lateral), and MID-MID] (n = 5 for each group), conventional SB (PL-high AM) (n = 5), and anatomic double-bundle (DB) (n = 5). Using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system, an 89 N anterior load (simulated KT1000 test) at 30, 60, and 90 degrees of knee flexion and a combined internal rotation (4 N m) and valgus (7 N m) moment (simulated pivot-shift test) at 30 and 60 degrees were applied. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) (mm) and in situ forces (N) of reconstructed grafts were calculated. During simulated KT1000 test at 60 degrees of knee flexion, the PL-PL had significantly lower in situ force than the intact ACL (P < 0.01). In situ force of the MID-MID was higher than other SB reconstructions (at 30 degrees : 94.8 +/- 2.5 N; at 60 degrees : 85.2 +/- 5.3 N; and 90 degrees: 66.0 +/- 8.7 N). At 30 degrees of knee flexion, the PL-high AM had the lowest in situ values (67.1 +/- 19.3 N). At 60 and 90 degrees of knee flexion the PL-PL had the lowest in situ values (at 60 degrees : 60.8 +/- 19.9 N; 90 degrees : 38.4 +/- 19.2 N). The MID-MID and DB had no significant in situ force differences at 30 and 60 degrees of knee flexion. During simulated pivot-shift test at 60 degrees of knee flexion, the PL-PL and PL-high AM reconstructions had a significant lower in situ force than the intact ACL (P < 0.01). During simulated KT1000 test at 30, 60, and 90 degrees of knee flexion, the PL-PL and PL-high AM had significantly lower ATT than the intact ACL (P < 0.01). During simulated KT1000 test at 60 and 90 degrees, the MID-MID, AM-AM, and DB had significantly lower ATT than the ACL deficient knee (P < 0.01). During simulated KT1000 test at 90 degrees, every reconstructed knee had significantly higher ATT than the intact knee (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the MID-MID position provided the best stability among all anatomic SB reconstructions and more closely restored normal knee kinematics.

Anatomic AM augmentation can lead to biomechanical advantages at time zero when compared with the nonanatomic (high AM) augmentation. Anatomic AM augmentation better restores the knee kinematics to the intact ACL state.

Background Impact injury to articular cartilage can lead to posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Hypotheses This study tests the hypotheses that (1) chondrocyte injury occurs after impact at energies insufficient to fracture the cartilage surface, and that (2) cartilage injury patterns vary with impact energy, time after injury, and cartilage thickness. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Fresh bovine osteochondral cores were randomly divided into 5 groups: (1) control, (2) 0.35 J, (3) 0.71 J, (4) 1.07 J, and (5) 1.43 J impact energies. Cores were subjected to computer-controlled impact loading and full-thickness sections were then prepared and incubated in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium/F12 at 37°C. Adjacent sections were harvested 1 and 4 days after impact for viability staining and fluorescent imaging. The area of dead and living chondrocytes was quantified using custom image analysis software and reported as a percentage of total cartilage area. Results The highest impact energy fractured the cartilage in all cores (1.43 J, n = 17). Seventy-three percent and 64% of the osteochondral cores remained intact after lower energy impacts of 0.71 J and 1.07 J, respectively. At lower energy levels, fractured cores were thinner (P < .01) than those remaining intact. In cores remaining intact after impact injury, chondrocyte death increased with increasing impact energy (P < .05) and with greater time after impact (P < .05). A progressive increase in dead cells near the bone/cartilage interface and at the articular surface was observed. Conclusion These data showing progressive chondrocyte death after impact injury at energies insufficient to fracture the cartilage surface demonstrate a potential need for early chondroprotective therapy. Clinical Relevance These data show that efforts to reduce chondrocyte morbidity after joint injury may be a useful strategy to delay or prevent the onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

Objectives Post-traumatic arthritis is a major cause of disability. Current clinical imaging modalities are unable to reliably evaluate articular cartilage damage prior to surface breakdown, when potentially reversible changes are occurring. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a nondestructive imaging technology that can detect degenerative changes in articular cartilage with an intact surface. This study tests the hypothesis that OCT detects acute articular cartilage injury following impact at energy levels resulting in chondrocyte death and microstructural changes, but insufficient to produce macroscopic surface damage. Methods Bovine osteochondral cores underwent OCT imaging and were divided into a control with no impact or were subjected to low (0.175 J) or moderate (0.35 J) energy impact. Cores were reimaged with OCT following impact and the OCT signal intensity quantified. A ratio of the superficial to deep layer intensities was calculated and compared before and after impact. Chondrocyte viability was determined one day after impact, followed by histology and polarized microscopy. Results Macroscopic changes to the articular surface were not observed following low and moderate impact. The OCT signal intensity ratio demonstrated a 27% increase (p=0.006) following low impact, and a 38% increase (p=0.001) following moderate impact. Cell death increased by 150% (p<0.001) and 200% (p<0.001) after low and moderate energy impacts, respectively. When compared to unimpacted controls, both Mankin histology and David-Vaudey polarized microscopy scores increased (p=0.036, p=0.002, respectively) following moderate energy impact. Conclusions This study shows that OCT detects acute cartilage changes after impact injury at levels insufficient to cause visible damage to the articular surface, but sufficient to cause chondrocyte death and microscopic matrix damage. This finding supports the utility of OCT to detect microstructural subsurface cartilage damage that is poorly visualized with conventional imaging.

No abstract

The acetabular labrum provides stability to the hip joint in response to a distraction force and combined distraction and translation forces. One centimetre of labral resection caused significant displacement ("wobbling" effect) of the femoral head within the acetabulum with normal range of motion. Successful labral repair could be crucial for restoration of the hip biomechanics and prevention of coxarthrosis.

No abstract