Background: Grain amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) has been cultivated since ancient times in some countries in the world and it is one of the oldest food crops. At present, the crop has gained more importance in the plains of India, especially in parts of Gujarat and Maharashtra. Grain amaranth exhibits an incredible extent of morphological diversity and an extensive adaptability to diverse eco-geographical conditions. Hence, the aim of the recent research was to evaluate the genetic diversity of 19 genotypes from four diverse species of Amaranthus from India using ISSR markers. Results: The set of 11 polymorphic ISSR primers produced a total of 114 amplicons, among which 98 amplicons were polymorphic. The mean number of polymorphic amplicons per primer was 8.91. Overall, the size of PCR-amplified DNA fragments ranged from 200 to 3702 bp. The average percent polymorphism was 87.15%, and the average PIC value was 0.853, which indicates good selection of primers in the present study for the assessment of genetic diversity. The unique amplicon (marker)-producing primers were also found which can be used for identification of genotypes. The dendrogram grouped 19 grain amaranth genotypes into two major clusters. The groups formed on the principle component analysis (PCA) plot resembles with the results of the dendrogram although some genotypes have been diverted on the PCA plot. Conclusions: The technique may be used to obtain reasonably precise information on the genetic relationship among grain amaranth genotypes. Such information may be useful for selecting the diverse parents and monitoring the genetic diversity periodically in the breeder's working collection of grain amaranth.
Present investigation was undertaken to evaluate 50 linseed genotypes for
three consecutive years for seed yield, oil content and agro-morphological
traits using multivariate approach. Higher range, large value of
Shannon-weaver diversity index for both traits and genotypes and large
differences in mean values for most of the characters showed that a wide and
significant variation existed among the genotypes and traits. Pooled
analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences (p<0.001) among
the genotypes for all the characters studied. The magnitude of the
phenotypic coefficient of variation was somewhat higher than the genotypic
coefficient of variation, indicating that the environment had little impact
on the expression of these traits. Cluster analysis for yield and
agro-morphological traits using unweighted pair group method of arithmetic
averages (UPGMA) grouped the genotypes into nine clusters with varied
number. Clustering of linseed genotypes from different geographical
locations or source/origin into same cluster has confirmed that they are
genetically related, and possibly from the same progenitor. The principal
component analysis (PCA) revealed that most of the variation (76.41%) was
accounted by first four PCA and indicated role of traits that contributed
significantly towards a wide variation among the genotypes. The positive
associations of seed yield per plant and oil content with component trait
implies that improving one or more component traits could result in genetic
enhancement of seed yield and oil content in linseed. The significant
negative association of seed yield per plant and oil content with days to
flowering and days to maturity has great advantages in breeding short
duration linseed cultivars for hot and water stress climatic conditions of
semi-arid regions. Trait specific genotypes namely, Shival, Sharda, IC54970,
Mukta, IC56363, T-397, IC53281 and RLC-92 were identified for the
development of short duration and dwarf cultivars with higher omega-3-fatty
acid content.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.