Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education (RME) terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari motivasi belajar matematika peserta didik. Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian eksperimen semu (Quasi Eksperiment) dengan menggunakan rancangan faktorial 2 × 2 dilaksanakan pada siswa SMP kelas VII. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada peserta didik yang dibelajarkan dengan pendekatan RME, hasil belajar matematika peserta didik yang memiliki motivasi belajar intrinsik lebih tinggi dari peserta didik yang memiliki motivasi belajar ekstrinsik. Selain itu terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara pendekatan pembelajaran RME dan motivasi belajar peserta didik terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa Pendekatan RME cocok di belajarkan pada peserta didik yang memiliki motivasi belajar intrinsik. ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine the effect of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Approach on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of students' mathematics learning motivation. This type of research is a quasi-experimental study (Quasi Experiment) using a 2 × 2 factorial design carried out on grade VII junior high school students. The results showed that in students who were taught with the RME approach, mathematics learning outcomes of students who had intrinsic motivation were higher than students who had extrinsic learning motivation. In addition, there is the effect of interaction between the RME learning approach and students' learning motivation on mathematics learning outcomes. This shows that the RME Approach is suitable for students who have intrinsic motivation to learn.
Differences qualitative and quantitative research to academicians and researchers mainly concentrated on education studies is only able to browse and identify with the fundamental difference merely as example: research that only uses quantitative data but using the qualitative as a benchmark often not considered as a quantitative research Likewise , qualitative research that uses quantitative data is not considered qualitative research. If traced further, actually qualitative and quantitative research very spacious and is a level. Qualitative and quantitative research in the context of methodology includes a researcher's conception of social reality, the researcher's self placement in relation to the reality study and various other reviews. Therefore, in this research article,is stated that the correlation between qualitative and quantitative research in educational research methodology is possible if both are based on the same paradigm. Conversely qualitative and quantitative researchis difficult to reconcile if they depart from different paradigms, which have different epistemological assumptions, and different goodness criteria.
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui: (1) Pengaruh hasil belajar IPS yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share dengan siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran Number Head Together (2) Interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPS. (3) Pengaruh antara hasil belajar IPS terhadap siswa yang memiliki motivasi tinggi yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share dan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Number Head Together. (4) pengaruh antara hasil belajar IPS terhadap siswa yang memiliki motivasi rendah yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share dan dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Number Head Together. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah: Eksperimen Faktorial ANAVA dua jalur dengan uji tuckey. Hasil penelitian ini: (1) Hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan model Think Pair and Share lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model Number Head Together (2) Terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar IPS (3) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar IPS pada kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi tinggi, yaitu hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model Think Pair and Share lebih tinggi dari pada siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model Number Head Together (4) Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar IPS pada kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi rendah, yaitu hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model Think Pair and Share lebih rendah dari pada siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model Number Head Together.
This research is a type of research and development that aims to develop and test the effectiveness of using smartphone-based interactive multimedia products using smart apps creator (SAC), which was developed through the development of the ADDIE model (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The research subjects were teachers and students of class X IPA 1 SMAN 4 Gorontalo, as many as 28 students. The product is considered suitable for use based on the validity criteria from the assessment of the material, media, and learning design experts. The product is also considered effective based on the learning outcomes of students with a one-group pretest-posttest experimental design. From the results of statistical analysis with the paired sample T-test where the value of is 12,560 and the value of is 2,05183, then . So, the hypothesis that there are differences in learning outcomes before using the product and after using the multimedia product is accepted. Then the effectiveness category is determined through the gain score test with the average gain score of 0.62 with a moderate classification and for the average percentage gain score of 62.25% with a fairly effective category.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.