The incidence of delayed ICH in our study was 1%. However, none of the delayed findings were clinically significant. Among patients on ACAP therapy with a negative CT1 and a normal or unchanged neurologic examination, a routine CT2 is unnecessary. We recommend a period of observation to recognize those patients with symptoms that could be due to delayed ICH.

Favorable CIS and recanalization were strong predictors of a good outcome. By using this new index as an adjunct to other criteria, the CIS may improve patient selection and help break the 50% barrier.

The addition of a dedicated TCU and advanced practice nurses improved the quality and reduced the cost of care, resulting in increased value at an adult Level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Intracranial angioplasty and stent placement are used to treat intracranial atherosclerotic disease. The 2 interventions have not been directly compared.

Background and Purpose-Although atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid and coronary arteries is accepted as a cause of ischemia, vertebral artery ostium (VAO) atherosclerotic plaque is not widely recognized as a source of ischemic stroke. We seek to demonstrate its implication in some posterior circulation ischemia. Methods-This is a nonrandomized, prospective, single-center registry on consecutive patients presenting with posterior circulation ischemia who underwent VAO stenting for significant atherosclerotic stenosis. Diagnostic evaluation and imaging studies determined the likelihood of this lesion as the symptom source (highly likely, probable, or highly unlikely). Patients were divided into 4 groups in decreasing order of severity of clinical presentation (ischemic stroke, TIA then stroke, TIA, asymptomatic), which were compared with the morphological and hemodynamic characteristics of the VAO plaque. Clinical follow-up 1 year after stenting assessed symptom recurrence. Results-One hundred fourteen patients underwent stenting of 127 lesions; 35% of the lesions were highly likely the source of symptoms, 53% were probable, and 12% were highly unlikely. Clinical presentation correlated directly with plaque irregularity and presence of clot at the VAO, as did bilateral lesions and presence of tandem lesions. Symptom recurrence at 1 year was 2%. Conclusions-Thirty-five percent of the lesions were highly likely the source of the symptoms. A direct relationship between some morphological/hemodynamic characteristics and the severity of clinical presentation was also found. Finally, patients had a very low rate of symptom recurrence after treatment. These 3 observations point strongly to VAO plaque as a potential source of some posterior circulation stroke. (Stroke. 2011;42:2544-2549.)

Objectives: In this systematic review and meta-analysis we asked: Do predictors of fluid responsiveness in children perform comparably: 1) in the PICU as in non-PICU settings? 2) in shock states compared with nonshock states? Additionally, 3) is there an association between preload responsiveness and clinical response? Data Sources: Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched from inception through May 2022. Study Selection: Included studies reported physiological response to IV fluid administration in humans less than 18 years. Only studies reporting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were included for descriptive analysis. Only studies for which a se could be estimated were included for meta-analysis. Data Extraction: Title, abstract, full text screening, and extraction were completed by two authors (S.B.W., J.M.W.). Variables extracted included predictors (“tools”) and outcome measures (“reference tests”) of fluid responsiveness, demographic, and clinical variables. Data Synthesis: We identified 62 articles containing 204 AUROCs for 55 tools, primarily describing mechanically ventilated children in an operating room or PICU. Meta-analysis across all tools showed poor predictive performance (AUROC, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63–0.69), although individual performance varied greatly (range, 0.49–0.87). After controlling for PICU setting and shock state, PICU setting was associated with decreased predictive performance (coefficient, –0.56; p = 0.0007), while shock state was associated with increased performance (0.54; p = 0.0006). Effect of PICU setting and shock state on each tool was not statistically significant but analysis was limited by sample size. The association between preload responsiveness and clinical response was rarely studied but results did not suggest an association. Ultrasound measurements were prone to inherent test review and incorporation biases. Conclusions: We suggest three opportunities for further research in fluid responsiveness in children: 1) assessing predictive performance of tools during resuscitation in shock states; 2) separating predictive tool from reference test when using ultrasound techniques; and 3) targeting decreasing time in a shock state, rather than just increase in preload.

Objectives: To assess focused cardiac ultrasound impact on clinician hemodynamic characterization of patients with suspected septic shock as well as expert-generated focused cardiac ultrasound algorithm performance. Design: Retrospective, observational study. Setting: Single-center, noncardiac PICU. Patients: Less than 18 years old receiving focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation from January 2014 to December 2016. Interventions: Hemodynamics of patients with suspected septic shock were characterized as fluid responsive, myocardial dysfunction, obstructive physiology, and/or reduced systemic vascular resistance by a bedside clinician before and immediately following focused cardiac ultrasound performance. The clinician’s post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic assessments were compared with an expert-derived focused cardiac ultrasound algorithmic hemodynamic interpretation. Subsequent clinical management was assessed for alignment with focused cardiac ultrasound characterization and association with patient outcomes. Measurements and Main Results: Seventy-one patients with suspected septic shock (median, 4.7 yr; interquartile range, 1.6–8.1) received clinician performed focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation (median, 2.1 hr; interquartile range, –1.5 to 11.8 hr). Two patients did not have pre-focused cardiac ultrasound and 23 patients did not have post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization by clinicians resulting in exclusion from related analyses. Post-focused cardiac ultrasound clinician hemodynamic characterization differed from pre-focused cardiac ultrasound characterization in 67% of patients (31/46). There was substantial concordance between clinician’s post-focused cardiac ultrasound and algorithm hemodynamic characterization (33/48; κ = 0.66; CI, 0.51–0.80). Fluid responsive (κ = 0.62; CI, 0.40–0.84), obstructive physiology (к = 0.87; CI, 0.64–1.00), and myocardial dysfunction (1.00; CI, 1.00–1.00) demonstrated substantial to perfect concordance. Management within 4 hours of focused cardiac ultrasound aligned with algorithm characterization in 53 of 71 patients (75%). Patients with aligned management were less likely to have a complicated course (14/52, 27%) compared with misaligned management (8/19, 42%; p = 0.25). Conclusions: Incorporation of focused cardiac ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected septic shock frequently changed a clinician’s characterization of hemodynamics. An expert-developed algorithm had substantial concordance with a clinician’s post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization. Management aligned with algorithm characterization may improve outcomes in children with suspected septic shock.

Objectives: Determine level of agreement among clinical signs of shock type, identify which signs clinicians prioritize to determine shock type and select vasoactive medications, and test the association of shock type-vasoactive mismatch with prolonged organ dysfunction or death (complicated course). Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Single large academic PICU. Patients: Patients less than 18 years treated on a critical care sepsis pathway between 2012 and 2016. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Agreement among clinical signs (extremity temperature, capillary refill, pulse strength, pulse pressure, and diastolic blood pressure) was measured using Fleiss and Cohen’s κ. Association of clinical signs with shock type and shock type-vasoactive mismatch (e.g., cold shock treated with vasopressor rather than inotrope) with complicated course was determined using multivariable logistic regression. Of 469 patients, clinicians determined 307 (65%) had warm and 162 (35%) had cold shock. Agreement across all clinical signs was low (κ, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20–0.30), although agreement between extremity temperature, capillary refill, and pulse strength was better than with pulse pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Only extremity temperature (adjusted odds ratio, 26.6; 95% CI, 15.5–45.8), capillary refill (adjusted odds ratio, 15.7; 95% CI, 7.9–31.3), and pulse strength (adjusted odds ratio, 21.3; 95% CI, 8.6–52.7) were associated with clinician-documented shock type. Of the 86 patients initiated on vasoactive medications during the pathway, shock type was discordant from vasoactive medication (κ, 0.14; 95% CI, –0.03 to 0.31) and shock type-vasoactive mismatch was not associated with complicated course (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1–1.02). Conclusions: Agreement was low among common clinical signs used to characterize shock type, with clinicians prioritizing extremity temperature, capillary refill, and pulse strength. Although clinician-assigned shock type was often discordant with vasoactive choice, shock type-vasoactive mismatch was not associated with complicated course. Categorizing shock based on clinical signs should be done cautiously.