The Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale (MSIS) is a measure of accumulated deficits assessed by means of a standard neurological examination. We compared the responsiveness of the MSIS with that of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We reviewed 4300 records collected systematically from 1995 to 2003 and identified 534 patients who had clinically definite multiple sclerosis and had had at least two clinical assessments with a time interval of 2-5 years. The rate of deterioration was significantly higher on the MSIS than on the EDSS. The annualized change in EDSS exhibited a maximum at baseline EDSS 4 and a subsequent rapid decline at higher baseline EDSS, while the annualized change in MSIS was fairly stable over a wide middle range of baseline MSIS. The variance of the annualized change in EDSS fluctuated markedly between the baseline EDSS categories, being highest at baseline EDSS 2, while the variance of the annualized change in MSIS was stable. The study indicates that the responsiveness of the MSIS is better than that of the EDSS in terms of both magnitude and stability over the range of measurement

Background and purpose: When the elderly begin planning for a safe future, they may choose to move to an assisted living facility. Assisted living facilities (ALF) are a popular choice for senior living, but whether residents maintain their independence and movement ability over time in assisted living facilities has not been studied. The purpose of this study is to examine the changes in impairments and activity limitations in residents of ALF over the course of one year.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore practicing speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') perceptions of factors that could facilitate or prevent the use of speech-generating devices (SGDs) in bilingual individuals with aphasia. Specifically, this exploratory study sought to identify the facilitators and barriers to SGD use in individuals with culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Method: An online survey was distributed to SLPs through an e-mail listserv and social media of an augmentative and alternative communication company. This article focused on the results of the survey items related to (a) the presence of bilingual individuals with aphasia on an SLP's caseload, (b) training related to SGD or bilingual aphasia, and (c) barriers and facilitators to SGD use. A thematic analysis was conducted to analyze the barriers and facilitators to SGD use reported by the respondents. Results: A total of 274 SLPs who met the inclusion criteria had experience in implementing SGD for people with aphasia. Regarding relevant training, our results indicated that very few SLPs received bilingual aphasia intervention training (17.22%) or bilingual SGD training (0.56%) in graduate school. The results from our thematic analysis revealed four major themes of barriers and facilitators to SGD use, including (a) hardware and software, (b) cultural and language content, (c) SLP's cultural and linguistic competency, and (d) resources. Conclusions: Practicing SLPs reported several barriers to SGD use in bilinguals with aphasia. Most notably, language barriers for monolingual SLPs were seen as the greatest barrier to language recovery in individuals with aphasia whose primary language is not English. Several other barriers were consistent with previous research, such as financial factors and insurance disparities. The top three most important factors that facilitate SGD use in bilinguals with aphasia, as identified by the respondents, include user-friendly symbol organization, personalized words, and ease of programming.