Despite decades of measurements, the nitrogen balance of temperate forest catchments remains poorly understood. Atmospheric nitrogen deposition often greatly exceeds streamwater nitrogen losses; the fate of the remaining nitrogen is highly uncertain. Gaseous losses of nitrogen to denitrification are especially poorly documented and are often ignored. Here, we provide isotopic evidence (δ 15 N NO3 and δ 18 O NO3 ) from shallow groundwater at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest indicating extensive denitrification during midsummer, when transient, perched patches of saturation developed in hillslopes, with poor hydrological connectivity to the stream, while streamwater showed no isotopic evidence of denitrification. During small rain events, precipitation directly contributed up to 34% of streamwater nitrate, which was otherwise produced by nitrification. Together, these measurements reveal the importance of denitrification in hydrologically disconnected patches of shallow groundwater during midsummer as largely overlooked control points for nitrogen loss from temperate forest catchments.M any forested catchments export far less nitrogen (N) in streamwater than they receive in atmospheric deposition (1, 2). The rest of the deposited N may accumulate in vegetation or soil organic matter, or be lost in gaseous form. Losses of N to denitrification, the microbial reduction of aqueous nitrate (NO 3 − ) to nitrous oxide (N 2 O, a greenhouse gas) and N 2 gas, are extremely difficult to measure due to the difficulty in directly measuring N 2 fluxes and due to the high degree of spatiotemporal variability in redox conditions and substrate sources (3). Many past studies using a range of measurements (streamwater nitrate isotopic composition, the acetylene block technique, N 2 O emissions, and mass balance calculations) have concluded that denitrification in temperate forests is highly uncertain or generally unimportant (e.g., refs. 4-8).Nitrogen budgets are particularly perplexing in the northern hardwood forests at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) in the White Mountains of New Hampshire, USA, where atmospheric deposition has supplied 6-8 kg N ha −1 ·yr −1 for half a century, a rate ∼5-10 times preindustrial levels (7-10). Accumulation of N in plant biomass ceased in the early 1990s (10, 11), while streamwater inorganic N export from catchments across the HBEF and nearby streams decreased to <1 kg N ha −1 ·yr −1 , for reasons that remain elusive (9,10,12). These N flux measurements imply increasingly important roles for N gas loss or storage in soil organic matter. However, both processes are so difficult to quantify that the fate, drivers, and consequences of the "missing" N remain unknown, at the HBEF and elsewhere (8)(9)(10)12 Table S1).Nitrate isotopic composition reflects not only NO 3 − sources but also fractionation from a range of processes (14, Table S1), including the HBEF (10, 17), have revealed little if any isotopic evidence of denitrification. SignificanceDenitrification is the most poorly under...
Indirect nitrous oxide (NO) emissions from rivers are currently derived using poorly constrained default IPCC emission factors (EF) which yield unreliable flux estimates. Here, we demonstrate how hydrogeological conditions can be used to develop more refined regional-scale EF estimates required for compiling accurate national greenhouse gas inventories. Focusing on three UK river catchments with contrasting bedrock and superficial geologies, NO and nitrate (NO) concentrations were analyzed in 651 river water samples collected from 2011 to 2013. Unconfined Cretaceous Chalk bedrock regions yielded the highest median NO-N concentration (3.0 μg L), EF (0.00036), and NO-N flux (10.8 kg ha a). Conversely, regions of bedrock confined by glacial deposits yielded significantly lower median NO-N concentration (0.8 μg L), EF (0.00016), and NO-N flux (2.6 kg ha a), regardless of bedrock type. Bedrock permeability is an important control in regions where groundwater is unconfined, with a high NO yield from high permeability chalk contrasting with significantly lower median NO-N concentration (0.7 μg L), EF (0.00020), and NO-N flux (2.0 kg ha a) on lower permeability unconfined Jurassic mudstone. The evidence presented here demonstrates EF can be differentiated by hydrogeological conditions and thus provide a valuable proxy for generating improved regional-scale NO emission estimates.
A dual-isotope and solute flux mass-balance was used to elucidate the processes that lead to attenuation of nitrogen contamination in an agriculturally impacted river. The River Wensum drains a lowland catchment with an area of 570 km² in East Anglia, eastern England. Analysis of nitrate concentration, δ¹⁵N(NO₃) and δ¹⁸O(NO₃) of samples from the River Wensum collected from upstream locations to the catchment outlet through all seasons and flow conditions showed a consistent pattern of increasing isotope values with decreasing nitrate concentrations downstream. δ¹⁵N(NO₃) and δ¹⁸O(NO₃) of catchment surface water and groundwater samples revealed a dominant influence from microbially cycled and nitrified source-nitrogen, which results in high nitrate concentrations in Chalk groundwater and upstream in the River Wensum. Denitrification of Chalk groundwater-baseflow in the hyporheic zone results in the downstream trend observed in the river. Hyporheic denitrification is estimated to remove 931 kg/day of nitrate-nitrogen by the catchment outlet, representing 31% of the potential riverine nitrate load. The use of dual-isotope and solute flux modeling at the catchment scale is a novel application to quantify denitrification within the river valley, demonstrating the importance of hyporheic zone processes in attenuating the impacts of anthropogenic contamination of hydrologic systems.
Agricultural streams receive large inputs of nutrients, such as nitrate (NO3−) and ammonium (NH4+), which impact water quality and stream health. Streambed sediments are hotspots of biogeochemical reactivity, characterised by high rates of nutrient attenuation and denitrification. High concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O) previously observed in stream sediments point to incomplete denitrification, with sediments acting as a potentially significant source of global N2O. We investigated the effect of sediment type and seasonal variation on denitrification and N2O production in the streambed of an agricultural UK stream. Denitrification was strongly controlled by sediment type, with sand-dominated sediments exhibiting potential rates of denitrification almost 10 times higher than those observed in gravel-dominated sediments (0.026 ± 0.004 N2O–N μg g−1 h−1 for sand-dominated and 0.003 ± 0.003 N2O–N μg g−1 h−1 for gravel-dominated). In-situ measurements supported this finding, with higher concentrations of NO3−, nitrite (NO2−) and N2O observed in the porewaters of gravel-dominated sediments. Denitrification varied substantially between seasons, with denitrification increasing from winter to autumn. Our results indicate highest NO3− reduction occurred in sand-dominated sediments whilst highest N2O concentrations occurred in gravel-dominated sediments. This suggests that finer-grained streambeds could play an important role in removing excess nitrogen from agricultural catchments without producing excess N2O.
Rationale: Information on the isotopic composition of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) at natural abundance supports the identification of its source and sink processes. In recent years, a number of mass spectrometric and laser spectroscopic techniques have been developed and are increasingly used by the research community. Advances in this active research area, however, critically depend on the availability of suitable N 2 O isotope Reference Materials (RMs).Methods: Within the project Metrology for Stable Isotope Reference Standards (SIRS), seven pure N 2 O isotope RMs have been developed and their 15 N/ 14 N, 18 O/ 16 O, 17 O/ 16 O ratios and 15 N site preference (SP) have been analysed by specialised laboratories against isotope reference materials. A particular focus was on the 15 N site-specific isotopic composition, as this measurand is both highly diagnostic for source appointment and challenging to analyse and link to existing scales.
Continental shelf sediments store large amounts of organic carbon. Protecting this carbon from release back into the marine system and managing the marine environment to maximize its rate of accumulation could both play a role in mitigating climate change. For these reasons, in the context of an expanding “Blue Carbon” concept, research interest in the quantity and vulnerability of carbon stored in continental shelf, slope, and deep ocean sediments is increasing. In these systems, carbon storage is physically distant from carbon sources, altered between source and sink, and disturbed by anthropogenic activities. The methodological approaches needed to obtain the evidence to assess shelf sea sediment carbon manageability and vulnerability within an evolving blue carbon framework cannot be transferred directly from those applied in coastal vegetated “traditional” blue carbon habitats. We present a toolbox of methods which can be applied in marine sediments to provide the evidence needed to establish where and when marine carbon in offshore sediments can contribute to climate mitigation, focusing on continental shelf sediments. These methods are discussed in the context of the marine carbon cycle and how they provide evidence on: (i) stock: how much carbon is there and how is it distributed? (ii) accumulation: how rapidly is carbon being added or removed? and (iii) anthropogenic pressures: is carbon stock and/or accumulation vulnerable to manageable human activities? Our toolbox provides a starting point to inform choice of techniques for future studies alongside consideration of their specific research questions and available resources. Where possible, a stepwise approach to analyses should be applied in which initial parameters are analysed to inform which samples, if any, will provide information of interest from more resource-intensive analyses. As studies increasingly address the knowledge gaps around continental shelf carbon stocks and accumulation – through both sampling and modelling – the management of this carbon with respect to human pressures will become the key question for understanding where it fits within the blue carbon framework and within the climate mitigation discourse.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.