The mammalian genome harbors up to one million regulatory elements often located at great distances from their target genes. Long-range elements control genes through physical contact with promoters and can be recognized by the presence of specific histone modifications and transcription factor binding. Linking regulatory elements to specific promoters genome-wide is currently impeded by the limited resolution of high-throughput chromatin interaction assays. Here we apply a sequence capture approach to enrich Hi-C libraries for >22,000 annotated mouse promoters to identify statistically significant, long-range interactions at restriction fragment resolution, assigning long-range interacting elements to their target genes genome-wide in embryonic stem cells and fetal liver cells. The distal sites contacting active genes are enriched in active histone modifications and transcription factor occupancy, whereas inactive genes contact distal sites with repressive histone marks, demonstrating the regulatory potential of the distal elements identified. Furthermore, we find that coregulated genes cluster nonrandomly in spatial interaction networks correlated with their biological function and expression level. Interestingly, we find the strongest gene clustering in ES cells between transcription factor genes that control key developmental processes in embryogenesis. The results provide the first genome-wide catalog linking gene promoters to their longrange interacting elements and highlight the complex spatial regulatory circuitry controlling mammalian gene expression.

SummaryPolycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) has a central role in the regulation of heritable gene silencing during differentiation and development. PRC1 recruitment is generally attributed to interaction of the chromodomain of the core protein Polycomb with trimethyl histone H3K27 (H3K27me3), catalyzed by a second complex, PRC2. Unexpectedly we find that RING1B, the catalytic subunit of PRC1, and associated monoubiquitylation of histone H2A are targeted to closely overlapping sites in wild-type and PRC2-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), demonstrating an H3K27me3-independent pathway for recruitment of PRC1 activity. We show that this pathway is mediated by RYBP-PRC1, a complex comprising catalytic subunits of PRC1 and the protein RYBP. RYBP-PRC1 is recruited to target loci in mESCs and is also involved in Xist RNA-mediated silencing, the latter suggesting a wider role in Polycomb silencing. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding recruitment and function of Polycomb repressors.

The Polycomb Repressive Complexes PRC1 and PRC2 maintain embryonic stem cell (ESC) pluripotency by silencing lineage-specifying developmental regulator genes1. Emerging evidence suggests that Polycomb complexes act through controlling spatial genome organisation2–9. We show that PRC1 functions as a master regulator of ESC genome architecture by organizing genes in three-dimensional interaction networks. The strongest spatial network is composed of the four Hox clusters and early developmental transcription factor genes, the majority of which contact poised enhancers. Removal of Polycomb repression leads to disruption of promoter-promoter contacts in the Hox network. In contrast, promoter-enhancer contacts are maintained, accompanied by widespread acquisition of active chromatin signatures at network enhancers and pronounced transcriptional up-regulation of network genes. Thus, PRC1 physically constrains developmental transcription factor genes and their enhancers in a silenced but poised spatial network. We propose that selective release of genes from this spatial network underlies cell fate specification during early embryonic development.

SummaryThe mechanisms by which the major Polycomb group (PcG) complexes PRC1 and PRC2 are recruited to target sites in vertebrate cells are not well understood. Building on recent studies that determined a reciprocal relationship between DNA methylation and Polycomb activity, we demonstrate that, in methylation-deficient embryonic stem cells (ESCs), CpG density combined with antagonistic effects of H3K9me3 and H3K36me3 redirects PcG complexes to pericentric heterochromatin and gene-rich domains. Surprisingly, we find that PRC1-linked H2A monoubiquitylation is sufficient to recruit PRC2 to chromatin in vivo, suggesting a mechanism through which recognition of unmethylated CpG determines the localization of both PRC1 and PRC2 at canonical and atypical target sites. We discuss our data in light of emerging evidence suggesting that PcG recruitment is a default state at licensed chromatin sites, mediated by interplay between CpG hypomethylation and counteracting H3 tail modifications.

Transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is often regulated by interactions with control proteins to link specific gene expression to environmental signals and temporal cues. Often activators help recruit RNAP to promoters to increase initiation rates (Busby and Ebright 1999). In contrast, activity of the bacterial 54 containing RNAP holoenzyme is regulated at the DNA melting step (for review, see Buck et al. 2000). Hydrolysis of an NTP by an activator drives a change in configuration of the 54 -holoenzyme, converting the initial closed complex to an open complex to allow interaction with the template DNA for mRNA synthesis (Wedel and Kustu 1995). Preopening of DNA templates does not overcome the requirement for NTP hydrolysis by an activator to promote engagement of the holoenzyme with the melted DNA (Wedel and Kustu 1995;Cannon et al. 1999).The activators of 54 -holoenzyme are members of the large AAA+ protein family, which use ATP binding and hydrolysis to remodel their substrates (Neuwald et al. 1999;Cannon et al. 2000Cannon et al. , 2001. The greater part of the central domain of 54 activators corresponds to the AAA core structure, and includes ATP-binding and hydrolyzing determinants. The 54 protein is known to be the primary target for the NTPase of activators, but how activators use NTP binding and hydrolysis is not well understood (Cannon et al. 2000). Similarly, the nature of the interaction between 54 and the activator is not well described, but an interaction with 54 can be detected in the case of the DctD activator by protein cross-linking (Lee and Hoover 1995). Here we show that the use of ADP-aluminum fluoride, an analog of ATP that mimics ATP in the transition state for hydrolysis, allows formation of a stable complex among the activator PspF, the PspF and NifA central activating domains, and 54 . The binding assay was used to help define determinants in 54 and the activator needed for their interaction, and to show that binding can lead to an altered 54 -DNA footprint. The need for a transition-state analog of ATP for protein-protein binding is discussed in relation to the required ATPase activity of activators of 54 -dependent transcription. In particular, it seems that altered functional states of activators exist as ATP is hydrolyzed. This suggests a parallel to some switch and motor proteins that use nucleotide binding and hydrolysis to establish alternate functional states (Hirose and Amos 1999).

No abstract

An important facet of transcriptional repression by Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) is the mono-ubiquitination of histone H2A by the combined action of the Posterior sex combs (Psc) and Sex combs extra (Sce) proteins. Here, we report that two ubiquitin-specific proteases, USP7 and USP11, co-purify with human PRC1-type complexes through direct interactions with the Psc orthologues MEL18 and BMI1, and with other PRC1 components. Ablation of either USP7 or USP11 in primary human fibroblasts results in de-repression of the INK4a tumour suppressor accompanied by loss of PRC1 binding at the locus and a senescence-like proliferative arrest. Mechanistically, USP7 and USP11 regulate the ubiquitination status of the Psc and Sce proteins themselves, thereby affecting their turnover and abundance. Our results point to a novel function for USPs in the regulation and function of Polycomb complexes.

No abstract