Electronic cigarette use has significantly increased over the past decade. However, there is limited preclinical research on the behavioral and abuse-related effects of nicotine vapor inhalation in rodents. The present study evaluates the effects of repeated nicotine vapor inhalation in male and female mice using a nicotine behavioral sensitization model. Male and female C57BL/6 mice were administered vaporized nicotine (0–10.0 mg/ml) or the positive control of intraperitoneally administered nicotine (0.5 mg/kg) once daily for 5 days, and locomotor activity was assessed. Body temperatures were measured before and after nicotine vapor inhalation to assess hypothermia. Nicotine vapor inhalation (1.0–3.0 mg/ml) produced a dose-dependent behavioral sensitization effect and produced hypothermia in male and female mice. Nicotine (0.5 mg/kg) also produced significant behavioral sensitization. No sex differences were found for nicotine behavioral sensitization with either route of administration. Pretreatment with the nonselective nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine blocked the behavioral sensitization produced by 1.0 mg/ml of nicotine vapor inhalation. These results established that nicotine vapor inhalation produces behavioral sensitization in an inverted U-shaped curve that is similar to the effects of injected nicotine across several behavioral models. Additionally, pretreatment with mecamylamine demonstrated that nicotinic receptor activation was responsible for the behavioral sensitization produced by nicotine vapor inhalation and was not a conditioned response to the vapor. The methods used in the present study provide an additional behavioral approach for evaluating the behavioral effects of repeated nicotine vapor inhalation that allows the manipulation of several variables, including e-liquid oil blend, e-liquid flavors, puff duration, etc.
Opioid use disorder (OUD) and opioid‐related deaths remain a significant public health crisis having reached epidemic status globally. OUDs are defined as chronic, relapsing conditions often characterized by compulsive drug seeking despite the deleterious consequences of drug taking. The use of nicotine‐containing products has been linked to increased likelihood of prescription opioid misuse, and there exists a significant comorbidity between habitual nicotine use and opioid dependence. In rodent models, nicotine administration nearly doubles the amount of opioids taken in intravenous self‐administration paradigms. Here, we examined the effect of acute systemic nicotine administration in male rats on responding for the synthetic opioid remifentanil (RMF) in a contextual punishment paradigm using either an exteroceptive punisher (foot‐shock) or an interoceptive punisher (histamine). Nicotine administration, relative to saline, increased RMF intake in both unpunished and punished contexts, regardless of form of punishment, and resulted in significantly higher motivation to obtain RMF in the previously punished context, as measured by progressive ratio breakpoint. Additionally, regardless of context, nicotine‐treated rats were slower to extinguish RMF responding following drug removal and displayed higher levels of cue‐induced reinstatement than saline‐treated controls. Furthermore, these data support that, compared with histamine adulteration, contingent foot‐shock is a more potent form of punishment, as histamine punishment failed to support contextual discrimination between the unpunished and punished contexts. In contrast to RMF administration, augmentation of responding for an audiovisual cue by nicotine pretreatment was lost following contextual punishment. In conclusion, acute nicotine administration in adult male rats significantly enhances compulsive‐like responding for RMF that persists despite contingent punishment of drug‐directed responding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.