This study assessed the 4- to 6-yr outcome of initial endodontic treatment during Phase 1 of the "Toronto Study" project. A total of 450 teeth were treated, alternating the "Schilder" technique and step-back with lateral condensation, and examined clinically and radiographically by an independent examiner. Apical periodontitis was recorded as absent (periapical index < 3) or present (periapical index > or = 3) and outcome dichotomized as "healed" (no apical periodontitis, no signs or symptoms) or "disease." Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed (p = 0.05) on 120 examined teeth. The "healed" rate (81% overall) was significantly higher for teeth treated without apical periodontitis (92%) than with apical periodontitis (74%). Several other factors were associated with healing rate differential of 10% or higher, but no statistical significance. This study confirmed apical periodontitis as the main prognostic factor in initial endodontic treatment. Continuation of the project will allow assessment of other prognostic factors with better power.

The 4- to 6-year outcome of orthograde retreatment was assessed for Phases I and II of the Toronto Study. In total, 523 teeth in 444 patients were retreated. With 395 teeth lost to follow-up and 25 extracted, 103 teeth (34% recall) were examined by two independent, blinded, calibrated examiners for outcome: "healed" (absence of apical periodontitis, signs, or symptoms) or "diseased" (presence of apical periodontitis, signs, or symptoms). The "healed" rate (81%) differed significantly for preoperative apical periodontitis (absent, 97%; present, 78%) and perforation (absent, 89%; present, 42%). Logistic regression revealed an increased risk of disease for preoperative perforation and adequate root filling quality, and postoperative lack of definitive restoration (odds ratios = 26.5, 6.6, and 14.0, respectively). Without perforation, inadequate intraoperative root filling length was also identified (odds ratio = 6.8). This study suggested that apical periodontitis, although a strong predictor, was secondary to preoperative perforation and root filling quality, and to postoperative restoration, in predicting the outcome of retreatment.

No abstract

No abstract

The 4- to 6-yr outcome of initial (first-time) endodontic treatment was assessed for Phase II of the "Toronto Study." In total, 442 teeth were treated by using flared preparation and vertical compaction of warm gutta-percha or step-back preparation and lateral compaction. With 126 teeth excluded (discontinuers: deceased and relocated patients), 163 dropouts, and 31 extracted, 122 (48% recall) were examined for outcome: "healed" (no apical periodontitis [AP], signs, symptoms) or "diseased" (AP, signs, or symptoms). Phase II was analyzed separately and combined with Phase I (n = 242), using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (p < or = 0.05). The healed rate (combined sample, 85%) differed significantly for preoperative AP (absent, 93%; present, 79%), treatment technique (flared preparation and vertical compaction, 90%; step-back preparation and lateral compaction, 80%), gender (females, 90%; males, 79%), number of roots (1-92%; > or = 2-81%), and root-filling length (adequate, 87%; inadequate, 77%). Logistic regression revealed increased risk of disease for preoperative AP (odds ratio = 3.3) and technique (odds ratio = 2.3). This study confirmed AP and highlighted treatment technique as the main predictors of outcome in initial treatment.