The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly impacted healthcare services around the world. Pharmacists are front-line healthcare professionals and integral members of the healthcare team. The deployment of a specialized 'COVID pharmacist' within our institution has demonstrated that the skills of the pharmacist can be adapted, expanded and utilized to alleviate the pressure of doctor shortages, reduce healthcare worker exposure to infected patients, contribute to therapeutic decisions and work collaboratively to tackle the challenges faced during this pandemic. This commentary details an Australian hospital pharmacy response to the COVID-19 pandemic, describing the unique clinical and practical contributions made by a specialized COVID pharmacist in our institution.
Background
Guidelines advocate multifactorial cardiovascular risk management in patients with diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Aim
In hospitalised patients with diabetes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), we aimed to evaluate the impacts of decision‐support algorithms for optimising glycaemia and lipid‐lowering. We also assessed the safety of initiating sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors near time of hospital discharge.
Methods
This was a single‐site, pre‐ and post‐intervention analysis of glucose and lipid management in consecutive hospitalised patients with diabetes undergoing CABG surgery. The intervention involved education and decision‐support algorithms designed by a multidisciplinary committee to guide cardiac surgery unit clinicians.
Results
A total of 200 patients were included in the study. The pre‐ and post‐intervention groups had similar baseline characteristics (HbA1c 7.9 ± 1.9% vs 8.1 ± 1.8%). Of 4092 blood glucose measurements, the incidence of levels between 5 and 10 mmol/L was not different post‐intervention (55.5% vs 57.0%; P = 0.441). Fewer endocrinology consultations occurred (59.0% vs 45.0%; P = 0.048) and rates of hypoglycaemia remained low. High‐intensity statin was prescribed in >90% pre‐ and post‐intervention, although non‐statin lipid‐lowering agents remained <10% despite patients not achieving LDL‐C targets. No 30‐day readmissions for diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in patients prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors.
Conclusion
The intervention did not improve inpatient glycaemia or increase non‐statin lipid‐lowering prescriptions in patients with diabetes following CABG surgery but did reduce reliance on specialty input. Initiation of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy near time of hospital discharge was not associated with safety concerns. Alternative interventions or strategies are required to optimise glycaemia and non‐statin lipid‐lowering therapy prescribing in this setting.
Recent cardiovascular safety trials on sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists have demonstrated the significant cardiovascular and renal benefits of these medications. Diabetes organisations have revised their medication guidelines to include a focus on disease outcomes for cardiovascular disease, heart failure and renal disease. This article summarises latest evidence, guideline recommendations and current Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme requirements.
We previously showed that implementing algorithms for managing diabetes in acute coronary syndrome was associated with improved inpatient glycaemic control and increased sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor prescriptions. The present study performed 1 year later found that inpatient hyperglycaemia had relapsed to pre‐intervention rates, although SGLT2 inhibitor prescriptions remained increased. We discuss the challenges of improving inpatient glycaemic control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.