No abstract

ImportanceIn patients with sarcoidosis with suspected cardiac involvement, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) identifies those with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. However, these outcomes are experienced by only a minority of patients with LGE, and identifying this subgroup may improve treatment and outcomes in these patients.ObjectiveTo assess whether CMR phenotypes based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LGE in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are associated with adverse outcomes during follow-up.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study included consecutive patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis who underwent CMR for the evaluation of suspected CS from 2004 to 2020 with a median follow-up of 4.3 years at an academic medical center in Minnesota. Demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, medications, and outcome data were collected blinded to CMR data.ExposuresCMR phenotypes were identified based on LVEF and LGE presence and features. LGE was classified as pathology-frequent or pathology-rare based on the frequency of cardiac damage features on gross pathology assessment of the hearts of patients with CS who had sudden cardiac death or cardiac transplant.Main Outcomes and MeasuresComposite of ventricular arrhythmic events and composite of heart failure events.ResultsAmong 504 patients (mean [SD] age, 54.1 [12.5] years; 242 [48.0%] female and 262 [52.0%] male; 2 [0.4%] American Indian or Alaska Native, 6 [1.2%] Asian, 90 [17.9%] Black or African American, 399 [79.2%] White, 5 [1.0%] of 2 or more races (including the above-mentioned categories and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander), and 2 [0.4%] of unknown race; 4 [0.8%] Hispanic or Latino, 498 [98.8%] not Hispanic or Latino, and 2 [0.4%] of unknown ethnicity), 4 distinct CMR phenotypes were identified: normal LVEF and no LGE (n = 290; 57.5%), abnormal LVEF and no LGE (n = 53; 10.5%), pathology-frequent LGE (n = 103; 20.4%), and pathology-rare LGE (n = 58; 11.5%). The phenotype with pathology-frequent LGE was associated with a high risk of arrhythmic events (hazard ratio [HR], 12.12; 95% CI, 3.62-40.57; P < .001) independent of LVEF and extent of left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement (LVLGE). It was also associated with a high risk of heart failure events (HR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.19-5.22; P = .02) independent of age, pulmonary hypertension, LVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction, and LVLGE extent. Risk of arrhythmic events was greater with an increasing number of pathology-frequent LGE features. The absence of the pathology-frequent LGE phenotype was associated with a low risk of arrhythmic events, even in the presence of LGE or abnormal LVEF.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that a CMR phenotype involving pathology-frequent LGE features was associated with a high risk of arrhythmic and heart failure events in patients with sarcoidosis. The findings indicate that CMR phenotypes could be used to optimize clinical decision-making for treatment options, such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is slowly but surely gaining a foothold in the hands of interventional cardiologists. Intraluminal and transmural contents of the coronary arteries are no longer elusive to the cardiologist's probing eye. Although the graduation of an interventionalist in imaging techniques right from naked eye angiographies to ultrasound-based coronary sonographies to the modern light-based OCT has been slow, with the increasing regularity of complex coronary cases in practice, such a transition is inevitable. Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) due to its robust clinical data has been the preferred imaging modality in recent years, OCT provides a distinct upgrade over it in many imaging and procedural aspects. Better image resolution, accurate estimation of the calcified lesion, and better evaluation of acute and chronic stent failure are the distinct advantages of OCT over IVUS. Despite the obvious imaging advantages of OCT, its clinical impact remains subdued. However, upcoming newer trials and data have been encouraging for expanding the use of OCT to wider indications in clinical utility. During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), OCT provides the detailed information (dissection, tissue prolapse, thrombi, and incomplete stent apposition) required for optimal stent deployment, which is the key to successfully reducing the major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and stent-related morbidities. The increasing use of OCT in complex bifurcation stenting involving the left main (LM) is being studied. Also, the traditional pitfalls of OCT, such as additional contrast load for image acquisition and stenting involving the ostial and proximal LM, have also been overcome recently. In this review, we discuss the interpretation of OCT images and its clinical impact on the outcome of procedures along with current barriers to its use and newer paradigms in which OCT is starting to become a promising tool for the interventionalist and what can be expected for the immediate future in the imaging world.

Background: There are few data on sex differences in suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. Methods: Consecutive patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis and suspected cardiac involvement were studied. We investigated sex differences in presenting features, cardiac involvement, and the long-term incidence of a primary composite end point of all-cause death or significant ventricular arrhythmia and secondary end points of all-cause death and significant ventricular arrhythmia. Results: Among 324 patients, 163 (50.3%) were female and 161 (49.7%) were male patients. Female patients had a greater prevalence of chest pain (37.4% versus 23.6%; P =0.010) and palpitations (39.3% versus 26.1%; P =0.016) than male patients but not dyspnea, presyncope, syncope, or arrhythmias at presentation. Female patients had a lower prevalence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (20.2% versus 35.4%; P =0.003) and less often met criteria for a clinical diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (Heart Rhythm Society consensus criteria, 22.7% versus 36.0%; P =0.012 and 2016 Japanese Circulation Society guideline criteria, 8.0% versus 19.3%; P =0.005), indicating lesser cardiac involvement. However, the long-term incidence of all-cause death or significant ventricular arrhythmia was not different between female and male patients (23.2% versus 23.2%; P =0.46). Among the secondary end points, the incidence of all-cause death was not different between female and male patients (20.7% versus 14.3%; P =0.51), while female patients had a lower incidence of significant ventricular arrhythmia compared with male patients (4.3% versus 13.0%; P =0.022). On multivariable analyses, sex was not associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio for female patients, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.77–2.43]; P =0.29). Conclusions: We observed distinct sex differences in patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. A paradox was identified wherein female patients had a greater prevalence of chest pain and palpitations than male patients, but lesser cardiac involvement, and a similar long-term incidence of all-cause death or significant ventricular arrhythmia.

Calcified lesions often result in undilatable lesions, balloon dog-boning, poor device delivery as well as underexpanded stents (UES). This leads to an increased risk of acute and chronic stent failure. A 49-year-old man was admitted with anterior wall myocardial infarction and angiogram showed a diffuse calcific left anterior descending artery/diagonal lesion, which was stented with two overlapping drug-eluting stents. Angiogram after post-dilatation showed UES. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed UES with 58% expansion, minimum stent area (MSA) of 2.91 mm2 and 360° calcium arc around the stent. This UES was dilated with a ultra high-pressure balloon (UHPB) at 40 atmosphere, that led to calcium fracture and increased MSA to 7.42 mm2 and stent expansion to 97%. While OCT-guided lesion modification prior to stenting is ideal, OCT-guided assessment and management is also invaluable post-percutaneous coronary intervention. In the event of stent underexpansion, UHPB may be used as an initial management strategy.