a) (b) (c) Figure 1: 2004 US Presidential elections: (a) geographically accurate map, (b) diffusion cartogram, (c) rectangular cartogram. AbstractCartograms are used to visualize geographically distributed data by scaling the regions of a map (e.g., US states) such that their areas are proportional to some data associated with them (e.g., population). Thus the cartogram computation problem can be considered as a map deformation problem where the input is a planar polygonal map M and an assignment of some positive weight for each region. The goal is to create a deformed map M , where the area of each region realizes the weight assigned to it (no cartographic error) while the overall map remains readable and recognizable (e.g., the topology, relative positions and shapes of the regions remain as close to those before the deformation as possible). Although several such measures of cartogram quality are well-known, different cartogram generation methods optimize different features and there is no standard set of quantitative metrics. In this paper we define such a set of seven quantitative measures, designed to evaluate how faithfully a cartogram represents the desired weights and to estimate the readability of the final representation. We then study several cartogram-generation algorithms and compare them in terms of these quantitative measures.

We describe a practical approach for visualizing multiple relationships defined on the same dataset using a geographic map metaphor, where clusters of nodes form countries and neighboring countries correspond to nearby clusters. Our aim is to provide a visualization that allows us to compare two or more such maps (showing an evolving dynamic process, or obtained using different relationships). In the case where we are considering multiple relationships, e.g., different similarity metrics, we also provide an interactive tool to visually explore the effect of combining two or more such relationships. Our method ensures good readability and mental map preservation, based on dynamic node placement with node stability, dynamic clustering with cluster stability, and dynamic coloring with color stability.

Abstract. We study the maximum differential graph coloring problem, in which the goal is to find a vertex labeling for a given undirected graph that maximizes the label difference along the edges. This problem has its origin in map coloring, where not all countries are necessarily contiguous. We define the differential chromatic number and establish the equivalence of the maximum differential coloring problem to that of k-Hamiltonian path. As computing the maximum differential coloring is NP-Complete, we describe an exact backtracking algorithm and a spectral-based heuristic. We also discuss lower bounds and upper bounds for the differential chromatic number for several classes of graphs.

We study the maximum differential coloring problem, where the vertices of an n-vertex graph must be labeled with distinct numbers ranging from 1 to n, so that the minimum absolute difference between two labels of any two adjacent vertices is maximized. As the problem is NP-hard for general graphs [16], we consider planar graphs and subclasses thereof. We prove that the maximum differential coloring problem remains NP-hard, even for planar graphs. We also present tight bounds for regular caterpillars and spider graphs. Using these new bounds, we prove that the Miller-Pritikin labeling scheme [19] for forests is optimal for regular caterpillars and for spider graphs.

We describe a practical approach for visualizing multiple relationships defined on the same dataset using a geographic map metaphor, where clusters of nodes form countries and neighboring countries correspond to nearby clusters. Our aim is to provide a visualization that allows us to compare two or more such maps (showing an evolving dynamic process, or obtained using different relationships). In the case where we are considering multiple relationships, e.g., different similarity metrics, we also provide an interactive tool to visually explore the effect of combining two or more such relationships. Our method ensures good readability and mental map preservation, based on dynamic node placement with node stability, dynamic clustering with cluster stability, and dynamic coloring with color stability.