Peri-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection increases postoperative mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal duration of planned delay before surgery in patients who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery during October 2020. Surgical patients with pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with those without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted 30-day mortality rates stratified by time from diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection to surgery. Among 140,231 patients (116 countries), 3127 patients (2.2%) had a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Adjusted 30-day mortality in patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.5% (95%CI 1.4-1.5). In patients with a pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, mortality was increased in patients having surgery within 0-2 weeks, 3-4 weeks and 5-6 weeks of the diagnosis (odds ratio (95%CI) 4.1 (3.3-4.8), 3.9 (2.6-5.1) and 3.6 (2.0-5.2), respectively). Surgery performed ≥ 7 weeks after SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was associated with a similar mortality risk to baseline (odds ratio (95%CI) 1.5 (0.9-2.1)). After a ≥ 7 week delay in undertaking surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with ongoing symptoms had a higher mortality than patients whose symptoms had resolved or who had been asymptomatic (6.0% (95%CI 3.2-8.7) vs. 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.4) vs. 1.3% (95%CI 0.6-2.0), respectively). Where possible, surgery should be delayed for at least 7 weeks following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with ongoing symptoms ≥ 7 weeks from diagnosis may benefit from further delay.

Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is a disease characterised by the presence of vegetations on cardiac valves, which consist of fibrin and platelet aggregates and devoid of inflammation or bacteria. NBTE has increasingly been recognised as a condition associated with numerous diseases and a potentially life-threatening source of thromboembolism. NBTE is not a common entity; however it is frequently underestimated, probably due to underlying diseases (cancer, autoimmune disorders, HIV). NBTE is difficult to diagnose and relies on strong clinical suspicion. NBTE is also difficult to manage and each case should be individually managed by identifying and treating the underlying pathology. Surgical intervention is not recommended unless the patient is in acute congestive failure.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Should patients undergoing cardiac surgery with atrial fibrillation (AF) have left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion?' Altogether 310 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that despite finding five clinical trials including one randomised controlled trial, that studied around 1400 patients who underwent LAA occlusion, the results of these studies do not clearly show a benefit for appendage occlusion. Indeed of the five studies, only one showed a statistical benefit for LAA occlusion, with three giving neutral results and in fact one demonstrating a significantly increased risk. One reason for this may be the inability to achieve acceptably high rates of successful occlusion on echocardiography when attempting to perform this procedure. The highest success rate was only 93% but most studies reported only a 55-66% successful occlusion rate when attempting closure in a variety of methods including stapling, ligation and amputation. Currently, the evidence is insufficient to support LAA occlusion and may indeed cause harm especially if incomplete exclusion occurs.

Pneumonectomy for NSCLC carries a considerable, but acceptable, operative mortality and provides an important survival benefit. This study suggests that older age and BPF are major determinants of an unfavourable in-hospital outcome; older age, BPF, adenocarcinoma cell type and higher pathological stage significantly reduce the probability of a long-term survival.

Various forms of renal replacement therapies (RRT) are available to treat acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery. The objective of this review is to assess the incidence of postoperative AKI that necessitates the application of haemofiltration in adult patients undergoing cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), to determine the factors that influence the outcome in these patients. In addition, the review aims to assess the outcomes of postoperative early haemofiltration as compared to late intensive haemofiltration. Different forms of RRT such as intermittent haemodialysis, continuous haemofiltration, or hybrid forms which combine advantages of both are now available for application in cardiac surgery patients, and will be discussed in this article. The underlying disease, its severity and stage, the aetiology of AKI, clinical and haemodynamic status of the patient, the resources available, and different costs of therapy may all influence the choice of the RRT strategy. AKI, with its risk of uraemic complications, represents an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery. Whether early initiation of RRT is associated with improved survival is unknown, and also clear guidelines on RRT durations are still lacking. In particular, it remains unclear whether haemodynamically unstable patients who develop septic shock pre- and postoperatively can benefit from early RRT initiation. In addition, it is not known whether in AKI patients undergoing cardiac surgery RRT modalities can eliminate significant amounts of clinically relevant inflammatory mediators. This review gives an update of information available in the literature on possible mechanisms underlying AKI and the recent developments in continuous renal replacement treatment modalities.

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1-6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9-3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality ). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment are unknown in this cohort of patients, and these data should be interpreted accordingly.

One of the major conceptual advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of heart failure has been the insight that myocardial dysfunction and heart failure may progress as the result of the sustained over-expression of nitric oxide (NO) metabolites locally and in blood modulated by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). This by virtue of their deleterious effects is sufficient to contribute to disease progression by provoking left ventricular (LV) remodeling, hypertrophy and progressive LV dysfunction. Recently, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) has also been identified in this setting of heart failure. Analogous to the situation with NO, the over-expression of TNF-alpha is sufficient to contribute to disease progression in heart failure phenotype. Although important interactions between TNF-alpha and the NO have been recognized in the cardiovascular system for over a decade, the nature and importance of the interactions between these biologically active molecules in cardiac hypertrophy has become apparent only in the recent times. Therefore, we focused on the prevailing updated evidence which suggests that there is a functionally significant cross-regulation between NO and TNF-alpha signaling in blood thus playing a part in cardiac hypertrophy and failure. The discussions presented here will have a bearing on the therapeutic potential via inhibitors of these pathways in reducing cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and the LV dysfunction.

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether calcium channel blockers or possibly nitrates are necessary if a radial artery conduit has been used for coronary artery bypass grafting. The reported search found 98 papers of which 14 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group, relevant outcomes and weaknesses were tabulated. We conclude routine use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and nitrates, in order to reduce vasospasm, is in widespread use but none of the clinical studies that we identified provided any evidence for their benefit. Furthermore, one study demonstrated that a vasoconstrictor mediated increase in blood pressure actually increased blood flow in the radial artery, and a further study reported that serotonin induced vasospasm was not attenuated by CCBs in vivo. All these studies are underpowered to exclude a benefit of vasodilators in improving graft patency in the medium term. However, an RCT that sought to prove an increase of 5% in patency rates (which are already around 90% or more) with a power of 80% would have to recruit and perform medium term angiography on 948 patients.