2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: impact of early versus late haemofiltration on morbidity and mortality

Abstract: Various forms of renal replacement therapies (RRT) are available to treat acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery. The objective of this review is to assess the incidence of postoperative AKI that necessitates the application of haemofiltration in adult patients undergoing cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), to determine the factors that influence the outcome in these patients. In addition, the review aims to assess the outcomes of postoperative early haemofiltration as compared to la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Newer developments in surgical techniques, such as minimally invasive surgery which avoids the manipulation of the ascending aorta, can also reduce kidney complications. 23 Although there is evidence from a variety of sources [24][25][26] that early filtration soon after on-pump surgery is beneficial for patients who have pre-operative renal impairment, there is a deficit of previous work on the clinical impact of intraoperative haemofiltration (haemofiltration applied during on-pump surgery). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anaesthesiologists' blood conservation practice guidelines 27 also recommend that the existing evidence, designated IIb(a) (p. 948), is insufficient to reach a consensus as to whether or not intraoperative haemofiltration is significantly beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Newer developments in surgical techniques, such as minimally invasive surgery which avoids the manipulation of the ascending aorta, can also reduce kidney complications. 23 Although there is evidence from a variety of sources [24][25][26] that early filtration soon after on-pump surgery is beneficial for patients who have pre-operative renal impairment, there is a deficit of previous work on the clinical impact of intraoperative haemofiltration (haemofiltration applied during on-pump surgery). The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anaesthesiologists' blood conservation practice guidelines 27 also recommend that the existing evidence, designated IIb(a) (p. 948), is insufficient to reach a consensus as to whether or not intraoperative haemofiltration is significantly beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best starting time for postoperative RRT is also controversial. Most studies have found lower mortality with the earlier initiation of RRT [163,186,187] . In addition, recent guidelines suggest that using continuous RRT is superior to standard intermittent RRT in hemodynamically unstable patients [148] .…”
Section: Pharmacological Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the delayed use of postoperative hemo iltration on patients with known preoperative kidney impairment does not signi icantly impact occurrence of AKI and the impact of AKI on survival. It is with this reasoning and evidence from other studies [46][47][48] that we hypothesize that for patients with preoperative kidney disease routine application of intraoperative haemo iltration or early CVVH rather than the traditional delayed CVVH (which is commonly started 1-3 days after CABG in response to mostly oliguria symptoms and electrolytes imbalance) may improve outcomes of these vulnerable patients. The recent introduction of hemodial iltration techniques incorporating citrate-based regional anticoagulation systems soon after CPB may be a game changer for patients with preoperative kidney disease in routine clinical practice [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%