Clostridium perfringens has been classified into five toxigenic types (A through E) on the basis of its capability to produce major lethal toxins (alpha, beta, epsilon, and iota toxins). Seroneutralization with mice or guinea pigs has been used to type each toxin, but this conventional method has some disadvantages. Therefore, we used a molecular biological technique to type the bacterium in the present study. A multiplex PCR was developed for this purpose. This method has several advantages in comparison with seroneutralization with mice or guinea pigs. By this method, we also investigated the most prevalent type(s) of the organism in Korean calves, piglets, and chickens showing clinical symptoms such as diarrhea, enterotoxemia, and necrotic enteritis. Only type A was isolated from calves and chickens, while type C (2 of 14 isolates), in addition to type A, was isolated from piglets. These results suggested that seroneutralization could be replaced by our new method and that type A of C. perfringens is the most prevalent type in livestock in Korea.

Regulatory T cells (T regs)

No abstract

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was adapted to detect toxin genes of staphylococcal isolates from cases of bovine mastitis. Samples were obtained from three geographical areas: Korea and Idaho and Washington in the northwest United States. Samples from Korea and Washington were randomly chosen. Idaho samples were from a prospective study of mastitis etiology. Forty-one milk samples from 25 commercial farms in south-central Idaho were collected from cows with symptoms of mastitis. Although Staphylococcus aureus constituted 37.5% of mastitis isolates, these isolates lacked genes for staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), toxic shock syndrome toxin, and exfoliative toxins. In contrast, 4 of 13 isolates from Washington and 6 of 20 isolates from South Korea expressed SEs. These results suggest that PCR may be an effective means of screening bovine isolates for toxins. They also emphasize the potential for significant geographic differences in mastitis etiology.

No abstract