Background -Viscoelastic secretions in cystic fibrosis cause impaired mucus clearance and persistence of bacteria within the lung. The abnormal rheology is partly due to the presence of high molecular weight deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Recombinant human DNase I (rhDNase) has been shown to depolymerise DNA and thereby reduce the in vitro viscoelasticity of sputum in patients with cystic fibrosis. A phase II double blind placebo controlled study showed that rhDNase improved pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis. The object of the present study was to evaluate the in vivo effects of rhDNase on sputum rheology and to determine whether these were correlated with changes in pulmonary function. Methods -Patients were randomised to receive either placebo or rhDNase 2-5 mg twice daily for 10 days. Sputum samples were collected in sterile containers during screening and during treatment with the study drug. Pulmonary function and rheological analysis were the primary outcomes evaluated. Other parameters assessed were quantitative sputum bacteriology, sputum DNA concentration, and change in molecular mass of DNA polymers.Results -The viscoelasticity of the sputum in untreated patients with cystic fibrosis was high and treatment with rhDNase reduced all the rheological parameters measured: dynamic storage modulus (a measure of elasticity), dynamic loss modulus (a measure ofviscosity), and log complex modulus (a measure of mucus rigidity). The calculated cough clearance index was also improved following treatment with rhDNase. These rheological parameters showed a correlation with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) which was improved by a mean (SE) of 13'3 (5-6)% on day 10 of treatment with rhDNase compared with a change of 0-2 (3.1)% in the placebo group. There was no change in bacterial colony counts or sputum DNA concentrations following treatment with rhDNase, but a small decrease in high molecular weight DNA was observed. Conclusions -Patients with cystic fibrosis treated with rhDNase show an improvement in rheological properties and pulmonary function, one of the mechanisms being a reduction in the proportion of high molecular weight DNA.

In different countries either one or several airway clearance regimens are used. This study provides evidence in support of current practices.

No abstract

Background: Chronic endobronchial sepsis and profuse airway secretions dominate pulmonary disease in cystic fibrosis. Recombinant human DNase I (dornase alfa) reduces the viscoelasticity of airway secretions and hence may improve clearance of airway secretions. Objectives: To evaluate the long-term influence of dornase alfa on disease progression by performing a case-controlled study with dornase alfa over a period of 4 years. Methods: A cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis who have been treated with dornase alfa were matched with a control group of patients with cystic fibrosis who had not received treatment with dornase alfa. The patients were matched by pulmonary function, age, and then sex. All available measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), height, weight and sputum bacteriology were collected for periods when the patients were free from respiratory exacerbations. Results: Thirty-eight patients were matched. Slopes of median changes in FEV₁ were –2.19 (–3.32, –1.06) in the control group and –0.75 (–1.87, 0.36) in the dornase alfa-treated group (p = 0.076). There were more infective exacerbations per patient year in the control group [3.13 (1.25–4.25)] in comparison to the dornase alfa group [1.25 (0.63–3.0), p = 0.035] over the 4-year treatment period. Antibiotic requirements were also greater with a median 43.75 (17.5–60.0) days of intravenous antibiotic use per patient year in the control group and 16.25 (8.5–44.0) days in the dornase alfa group (p = 0.034). Conclusions: The trends suggest that dornase alfa may have some influence on disease progression but in view of the limitations of the current study the need for further long-term studies in larger cohorts of patients is emphasised.

Recombinant human DNase I (rhDNase) has been shown to improve pulmonary function in patients treated for up to 6 months. A cohort of 52 cystic fibrosis patients with a FVC > 40% predicted were enrolled into an open label study in order to evaluate longer-term effects of rhDNase. They received 2.5 mg rhDNase twice daily for 6 months followed by a 2-week wash-out period, and for the subsequent 18 months were treated with rhDNase once daily. Twenty-six male and 26 female patients with a mean FVC of 2.941 and FEV1 of 1.471 were recruited. Thirteen patients did not complete the study; there were seven deaths, three patients withdrew consent and three patients were lost to follow-up. Improvement in pulmonary function was seen following treatment and changes were evaluated as mean percent change from baseline. The maximum improvement occurred in the first month followed by a plateau at a lower level of improvement. The mean improvement in FEV1 over the first month was 13.3% (range 12-14.1%), followed by a plateau at around 7.1% (range 4.6-11.0%) for the subsequent 23 months. Mean FVC was improved by 12.03% (range 9.0-14.3%) over the first month and subsequently 4.2% (range - 2.2-10.2%). The effects on pulmonary function were similar for both treatment doses of rhDNase. There was also a steady improvement in weight from a mean of 54.2 kg to 55.7 kg at the end of the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

No abstract

Since the discovery of the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis (CF) in 1989, hopes have been pinned on a future with novel therapies tackling the basis of the disease rather than its symptoms. These have become a reality over the last decade with the development through to the clinic of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. These are oral drugs which improve CFTR protein function through either increasing the time the channel pore is open (potentiators) or facilitating its trafficking through the cell to its location on the cell membrane (correctors). The first potentiator, ivacaftor, is now licensed and available clinically in many parts of the world. It is highly effective with impressive clinical impact in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract; longer‐term data from patient registries show fewer exacerbations, a slower rate of lung function loss and reduced need for transplantation in patients receiving ivacaftor. However, as a single drug, it is suitable for only a small minority of patients. The commonest CFTR mutation, F508del, requires both correction and potentiation for clinical efficacy. Two dual‐agent drugs (lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor) have progressed through to licensing, although their short term impact is more modest than that of ivacaftor; this is likely due to only partial correction of protein misfolding and trafficking. Most recently, triple compounds have been developed: two different corrector molecules (elexacaftor and tezacaftor) which, by addressing different regions in the misfolded F508del protein, more effectively improve trafficking. In addition to large improvements in clinical outcomes in people with two copies of F508del, the combination is sufficiently effective that it works in patients with only one copy of F508del and a second, nonmodulator responsive mutation. For the first time, we thus have a drug suitable for around 85% of people with CF. Even more gains are likely to be possible when these drugs can be used in younger children, although more sensitive outcome measures are needed for this age group. Special consideration is needed for people with very rare mutations; those with nonmodulatable mutation combinations will likely require gene or messenger RNA‐based therapeutic approaches, many of which are being explored. Although this progress is hugely to be celebrated, we still have more work to do. The international collaboration between trials networks, pharma, patient organizations, registries, and people with CF is something we are all rightly proud of, but innovative trial design and implementation will be needed if we are to continue to build on this progress and further develop drugs for people with CF.

No abstract