Circadian clocks govern a wide range of cellular and physiological functions in various organisms. Recent evidence suggests distinct functions of local clocks in peripheral mammalian tissues such as immune responses and cell cycle control. However, studying circadian action in peripheral tissues has been limited so far to mouse models, leaving the implication for human systems widely elusive. In particular, circadian rhythms in human skin, which is naturally exposed to strong daytime-dependent changes in the environment, have not been investigated to date on a molecular level. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of circadian gene expression in human epidermis. Whole-genome microarray analysis of suction-blister epidermis obtained throughout the day revealed a functional circadian clock in epidermal keratinocytes with hundreds of transcripts regulated in a daytime-dependent manner. Among those, we identified a circadian transcription factor, Krüp-pel-like factor 9 (Klf9), that is substantially up-regulated in a cortisol and differentiation-state-dependent manner. Gain-and loss-offunction experiments showed strong antiproliferative effects of Klf9. Putative Klf9 target genes include proliferation/differentiation markers that also show circadian expression in vivo, suggesting that Klf9 affects keratinocyte proliferation/differentiation by controlling the expression of target genes in a daytime-dependent manner.glucocorticoids | skin cancer B iological rhythms regulate cellular and physiological processes ranging from milliseconds to years. A well-studied timing system is the circadian (∼24-h) clockwork that allows organisms to anticipate diurnal variations in environmental conditions such as light, food availability, oxidative stress, pathogen exposure, or temperature. In mammals, the central circadian pacemaker resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), located in the anterior hypothalamus. Oscillations of SCN neurons are cell-autonomous, self-sustained, and synchronized to external time cues (Zeitgebers) such as light (1). The SCN, in turn, synchronizes peripheral clocks by systemic time cues such as neuronal input, hormonal signaling (e.g., cortisol), body temperature, and possibly many others (2). Interestingly, most cells in peripheral tissues also possess cell-autonomous clockworks with a similar molecular makeup to SCN neurons. These peripheral clocks are thought to generate or amplify daytime-dependent physiological and metabolic functions in a tissue-specific manner by circadian regulation of clock-controlled genes (3, 4).On a molecular level, circadian oscillation is generated by interlocked transcriptional-translational feedback loops. The transcription factor dimer CLOCK/BMAL1 drives expression of target genes such as Periods (Per1-3) and Cryptochromes (Cry1-2) by binding to E-box elements in their promoters. The negative feedback is formed by PER/CRY protein complexes that shuttle back into the nucleus, where they block CLOCK/BMAL1-mediated transactivation, thereby inhibiting their own transcr...

In mammals, circadian rhythms are generated by delayed negative feedback, in which period (PER1-PER3) and cryptochrome (CRY1, CRY2) proteins gradually accumulate in the nucleus to suppress the transcription of their own genes. Although the importance of nuclear import and export signals for the subcellular localization of clock proteins is well established, little is known about the dynamics of these processes as well as their importance for the generation of circadian rhythms. We show by pharmacological perturbations of oscillating cells that nuclear import and export are of crucial importance for the circadian period. Live-cell fluorescence microscopy revealed that nuclear import of the key circadian protein PER2 is fast and further accelerated by CRY1. Moreover, PER2 nuclear import is crucially dependent on a specific nuclearreceptor-binding motif in PER2 that also mediates nuclear immobility. Nuclear export, however, is relatively slow, supporting a model of PER2 nuclear accumulation by rapid import, slow export and substantial nuclear degradation.

A ubiquitous feature of the circadian clock across life forms is its organization as a network of cellular oscillators, with individual cellular oscillators within the network often exhibiting considerable heterogeneity in their intrinsic periods. The interaction of coupling and heterogeneity in circadian clock networks is hypothesized to influence clock's entrainability, but our knowledge of mechanisms governing period heterogeneity within circadian clock networks remains largely elusive. In this study, we aimed to explore the principles that underlie intercellular period variation in circadian clock networks (clonal period heterogeneity). To this end, we employed a laboratory selection approach and derived a panel of 25 clonal cell populations exhibiting circadian periods ranging from 22 to 28 h. We report that a single parent clone can produce progeny clones with a wide distribution of circadian periods, and this heterogeneity, in addition to being stochastically driven, has a heritable component. By quantifying the expression of 20 circadian clock and clock-associated genes across our clone panel, we found that inheritance of expression patterns in at least three clock genes might govern clonal period heterogeneity in circadian clock networks. Furthermore, we provide evidence suggesting that heritable epigenetic variation in gene expression regulation might underlie period heterogeneity.