Drosophila cryptochrome (dCRY) is a FAD-dependent circadian photoreceptor, whereas mammalian cryptochromes (CRY1/2) are integral clock components that repress mCLOCK/mBMAL1-dependent transcription. We report crystal structures of full-length dCRY, a dCRY loop deletion construct, and the photolyase homology region of mouse CRY1 (mCRY1). Our dCRY structures depict Phe534 of the regulatory tail in the same location as the photolesion in DNA-repairing photolyases and reveal that the sulfur loop and tail residue Cys523 plays key roles in the dCRY photoreaction. Our mCRY1 structure visualizes previously characterized mutations, an NLS, and MAPK and AMPK phosphorylation sites. We show that the FAD and antenna chromophore-binding regions, a predicted coiled-coil helix, the C-terminal lid, and charged surfaces are involved in FAD-independent mPER2 and FBXL3 binding and mCLOCK/mBMAL1 transcriptional repression. The structure of a mammalian cryptochrome1 protein may catalyze the development of CRY chemical probes and the design of therapeutic metabolic modulators.

Period (PER) proteins are essential components of the mammalian circadian clock. They form complexes with cryptochromes (CRY), which negatively regulate CLOCK/BMAL1-dependent transactivation of clock and clock-controlled genes. To define the roles of mammalian CRY/PER complexes in the circadian clock, we have determined the crystal structure of a complex comprising the photolyase homology region of mouse CRY1 (mCRY1) and a C-terminal mouse PER2 (mPER2) fragment. mPER2 winds around the helical mCRY1 domain covering the binding sites of FBXL3 and CLOCK/BMAL1, but not the FAD binding pocket. Our structure revealed an unexpected zinc ion in one interface, which stabilizes mCRY1-mPER2 interactions in vivo. We provide evidence that mCRY1/mPER2 complex formation is modulated by an interplay of zinc binding and mCRY1 disulfide bond formation, which may be influenced by the redox state of the cell. Our studies may allow for the development of circadian and metabolic modulators.

The three PERIOD homologues mPER1, mPER2, and mPER3 constitute central components of the mammalian circadian clock. They contain two PAS (PER-ARNT-SIM) domains (PAS-A and PAS-B), which mediate homo-and heterodimeric mPER-mPER interactions as well as interactions with transcription factors and kinases. Here we present crystal structures of PAS domain fragments of mPER1 and mPER3 and compare them with the previously reported mPER2 structure. The structures reveal homodimers, which are mediated by interactions of the PAS-B β-sheet surface including a highly conserved tryptophan (Trp448 mPER1 , Trp419 mPER2 , Trp359 mPER3 ). mPER1 homodimers are additionally stabilized by interactions between the PAS-A domains and mPER3 homodimers by an N-terminal region including a predicted helix-loop-helix motive. We have verified the existence of these homodimer interfaces in solution and inside cells using analytical gel filtration and luciferase complementation assays and quantified their contributions to homodimer stability by analytical ultracentrifugation. We also show by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analyses that destabilization of the PAS-B/tryptophan dimer interface leads to a faster mobility of mPER2 containing complexes in human U2OS cells. Our study reveals structural and quantitative differences between the homodimeric interactions of the three mouse PERIOD homologues, which are likely to contribute to their distinct clock functions.circadian clock | PAS domains | PERIOD proteins | protein interactions

The cell biology of circadian clocks is still in its infancy. Here, we describe an efficient strategy for generating knock-in reporter cell lines using CRISPR technology that is particularly useful for genes expressed transiently or at low levels, such as those coding for circadian clock proteins. We generated single and double knock-in cells with endogenously expressed PER2 and CRY1 fused to fluorescent proteins allowing us to simultaneously monitor the dynamics of CRY1 and PER2 proteins in live single cells. Both proteins are highly rhythmic in the nucleus of human cells with PER2 showing a much higher amplitude than CRY1. Surprisingly, CRY1 protein is nuclear at all circadian times indicating the absence of circadian gating of nuclear import. Furthermore, in the nucleus of individual cells CRY1 abundance rhythms are phase-delayed (~5 hours), and CRY1 levels are much higher (>5 times) compared to PER2 questioning the current model of the circadian oscillator.

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) is a key species in Southern Ocean ecosystem where it plays a central role in the Antarctic food web. Available information supports the existence of an endogenous timing system in krill enabling it to synchronize metabolism and behavior with an environment characterized by extreme seasonal changes in terms of day length, food availability, and surface ice extent. A screening of our transcriptome database “KrillDB” allowed us to identify the putative orthologues of 20 circadian clock components. Mapping of conserved domains and phylogenetic analyses strongly supported annotations of the identified sequences. Luciferase assays and co-immunoprecipitation experiments allowed us to define the role of the main clock components. Our findings provide an overall picture of the molecular mechanisms underlying the functioning of the endogenous circadian clock in the Antarctic krill and shed light on their evolution throughout crustaceans speciation. Interestingly, the core clock machinery shows both mammalian and insect features that presumably contribute to an evolutionary strategy to cope with polar environment’s challenges. Moreover, despite the extreme variability characterizing the Antarctic seasonal day length, the conserved light mediated degradation of the photoreceptor EsCRY1 suggests a persisting pivotal role of light as a Zeitgeber.

The skin is the largest human organ with a circadian clock that regulates its function. Although circadian rhythms in specific functions are known, rhythms in the proximal clock output, gene expression, in human skin have not been thoroughly explored. This work reports 24 h gene expression rhythms in two skin layers, epidermis and dermis, in a cohort of young, healthy adults, who maintained natural, regular sleep-wake schedules. 10% of the expressed genes showed such diurnal rhythms at the population level, of which only a third differed between the two layers. Amplitude and phases of diurnal gene expression varied more across subjects than layers, with amplitude being more variable than phases. Expression amplitudes in the epidermis were larger and more subject-variable, while they were smaller and more consistent in the dermis. Core clock gene expression was similar across layers at the population-level, but were heterogeneous in their variability across subjects. We also identified small sets of biomarkers for internal clock phase in each layer, which consisted of layer-specific non-core clock genes. This work provides a valuable resource to advance our understanding of human skin and presents a novel methodology to quantify sources of variability in human circadian rhythms.

Targeted genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9 is a relatively new, revolutionary technology allowing for efficient and directed alterations of the genome. It has been widely used for loss-of-function studies in animals and cell lines but has not yet been used to study circadian rhythms. Here, we describe the application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for the generation of an F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 3 (Fbxl3) knockout in a human cell line. Genomic alterations at the Fbxl3 locus occurred with very high efficiency (70%-100%) and specificity at both alleles, resulting in insertions and deletions that led to premature stop codons and hence FBXL3 knockout. Fbxl3 knockout cells displayed low amplitude and long period oscillations of Bmal1-luciferase reporter activity as well as increased CRY1 protein stability in line with previously published phenotypes for Fbxl3 knockout in mice. Thus, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing should be highly valuable for studying circadian rhythms not only in human cells but also in classic model systems as well as nonmodel organisms.

The current model of the mammalian circadian oscillator is predominantly based on data from genetics and biochemistry experiments, while the cell biology of circadian clocks is still in its infancy. Here, we describe a new strategy for the efficient generation of knock-in reporter cell lines using CRISPR technology that is particularly useful for lowly or transiently expressed genes, such as those coding for circadian clock proteins. We generated single and double knock-in cells with endogenously expressed PER2 and CRY1 fused to fluorescent proteins, which allowed to simultaneously monitor the dynamics of CRY1 and PER2 proteins in live single cells. Both proteins are highly rhythmic in the nucleus of human cells with PER2 showing a much higher amplitude than CRY1. Surprisingly, CRY1 protein is nuclear at all circadian times indicating the absence of circadian gating of nuclear import. Furthermore, in the nucleus of individual cells CRY1 abundance rhythms are phase-delayed (~5 hours), and CRY1 levels are much higher (>6 times) compared to PER2 questioning the current model of the circadian oscillator.Our knock-in strategy will allow the generation of additional single, double or triple knock-in cells for circadian clock proteins, which should greatly advance our understanding about the cell biology of circadian clocks.Recent biochemical studies with mouse liver lysates suggest that during the repressive phase, essentially all nuclear PER and CRY proteins are coordinated together in one large repressive complex, with only a minor amount of CRY1 monomers detectable (17). Again, double knock-out of either Per1/2 or Cry1/2 completely prevented the formation of this repressive complex.Most of the current knowledge of PER and CRY protein dynamics resulted either from biochemical data with mixed lysates of many thousand cells, or from single-cell imaging of over-expressed fluorescent tagged fusion proteins (12,13,17,18). Both approaches have clear limitations: Population samplinge.g. cell fractionation followed by Western Blot, chromatography or immunoprecipitation -not only conceals spatial information but also suffers from much reduced temporal resolution. Most importantly, however, population sampling averages signals from thousands of cells thereby masking individual cell properties (e.g. regarding circadian period, phase and amplitude) and degree of noise.While fluorescent tagged proteins constitute an outstanding tool to monitor protein expression and localization in individual living cells, overexpression of PER-and CRY-proteins in most cases disrupts the circadian oscillator and data from such experiments have to be conceived with caution (19,20).Such limitations can be overcome by incorporating a fluorescent tag directly into the proteins' genomic locus. In this case, expression dynamics and level of the resulting fusion protein often remain similar to the wild-type protein and the clock stays intact. Indeed, the PER2-Luciferase and the PER2-Venus knock-in mice -in which PER2 is tagged at the genomic level with ...