Objective: A very few flaps would be described as versatile as the Keystone Flap. There is an increasing demand for coverage of defects in lower limb due to traumatic defects as well as other parts of the body. Keystone flap is one of its kind, which is simple and easy to perform. It is a safe option for conditions where microsurgery may not be a viable option. The relative simplicity of this flap makes it a to go option at many places. Methods: A prospective study was developed from October 2017 to December 2019 at SMS Hospital, Jaipur. We assessed the size of the flap, operation time, average hospital stay and the complications. Perforators over the leg were Doppler marked preoperatively over which the flap was raised. Results: 50 patients were taken into the study. 30 key stone flaps were done to cover lower limb defects, 10 flaps were done for upper limb defects and the remaining 10 were for trunk defects. The average intraoperative time from skin incision to final suture was 50 min (range 20e90 min). The largest defect covered by keystone flap in our series measured 50 Â 20 cm and the smallest defect covered was 8 Â 4 cm. The average hospital stay was 3 days. We observed partial flap necrosis in 2 cases which required skin grafting. 3 other cases had wound infection leading to wound dehiscence, which required secondary suturing. The overall success rate was 95%. Conclusion:The Keystone flap being a versatile flap with its qualities of replacing "like with like", easy to perform, use of local tissue, good vascularity and a low complication rate makes it an excellent flap for a variety of defects. The KeyStone flap allows reconstruction in a single stage and is a relatively easy and fast technique for the beginner as well as the experienced surgeon. We believe it should be incorporated more into a surgeons practice.

Background The declaration of COVID pandemic by the WHO can certainly be seen as a watershed era the world has witnessed in modern times. All non-essential industries and services have taken a back seat including aesthetic medicine. Over the last decade, India has witnessed a steady growth in medical tourism owing to global standards of care and services at a relatively modest cost. The following study was conducted to ascertain the sea change that this pandemic has brought into aesthetic surgeons' practice, patient management, planning and consultation. This paper throws light on the journey of Indian aesthetic surgery from its infancy to its current presence in the global market as a context of the study. We have also discussed the impact of social media on aesthetic surgeons' practice, lifestyle and its role as an emerging new method of medical education. Methods A questionnaire consisting of 62 questions divided in 3 sections was rolled out to 150 Indian aesthetic surgeons who have been practising either independently in their clinics or are associated with hospitals. A: Pre-COVID practice management and lifestyle; B: life during the lockdown; C: anticipated changes in post-COVID era. Results In the pre-COVID era, an average aesthetic surgeon was finely balancing his profession, personal lifestyle, learning, and recreation. The lockdown clamped their practices which lead into a financial drought; despite which, they were able to maintain their productivity by engaging in webinars, reading, and research. The post-COVID times demand an implementation of safety protocols along with changes in setup , regulating patient traffic, engaging in distant learning through virtual conferences, and maintaining a healthy lifestyle acquired during the lockdown. Conclusions India was rightly witnessing a surge in popularity of aesthetic surgery and medical tourism over the last decade. The corona pandemic has definitely hit this escalating growth curve hard, and it will take some time for the demand to recover. Our study revealed the following conclusions: The effect of COVID 19 demands a major change in aesthetic surgeons' professional practice like limiting consultations, changing hospital floor plan, following COVID testing, and having new safety protocols. Social media is rightly poised to be a major tool for education and marketing as also for recreation and leisure. The role of teleconsultation needs to be reprised and legalised. Webinars and virtual conferences will find more takers in future. Level of evidence: not ratable.

No abstract

Background Excessive use of corticosteroids therapy along with gross immunocompromised conditions in the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised the risks of contracting opportunistic fungal infections. Here, we describe our experience with the implementation of a surgical protocol to treat and reconstruct rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Methods A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was conducted on consecutive patients diagnosed with mucormycosis undergoing immediate reconstruction utilizing our “Mucormycosis Management Protocol.” All patients included in this study underwent reconstruction after recovering from COVID-19. Wide local excision was performed in all cases removing all suspected and edematous tissue. Reconstruction was done primarily after clear margins were achieved on clinical assessment under a cover of injectable liposomal amphotericin B. Results Fourteen patients were included. The average age was 43.6 years and follow-up was 24.3 days. Thirteen patients had been admitted for inpatient care of COVID-19. Steroid therapy was implemented for 2 weeks in 11 patients and for 3 weeks in 3 patients. Eight patients (57.1%) had a maxillectomy and mucosal lining resection with/without skin excision, and six patients (42.8%) underwent maxillectomy and wide tissue excision (maxillectomy and partial zygomatic resection, orbital exenteration, orbital floor resection, nose debridement, or skull base debridement). Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps were used to cover defects in all patients. All flaps survived. No major or minor complications occurred. No recurrence of mucormycosis was noted. Conclusion The approach presented in this study indicates that immediate reconstruction is safe and reliable in cases when appropriate tissue resection is accomplished. Further studies are required to verify the external validity of these findings.

No abstract

ree tissue transfer is considered the standard treatment for oncologic reconstruction of head and neck defects, as it has been shown to offer equivalent success rates of flap survival in comparison to regional flaps, with the advantage of optimizing function. [1][2][3][4] The overall rate of a successful free flap for head and neck reconstruction in large centers has been reported to be approximately 95%. 5 Nonetheless, outcomes are generally suboptimal if flaps present vascular complications requiring reexploration after primary Background: Finite options exist to address free flap failure. There is a lack of consensus on the standard treatment for secondary reconstruction in such cases. Herein, the authors determined the survival rate of a second flap following a total loss of an initial free flap during head and neck reconstructions and evaluated whether there was a difference in the rate of secondary flap necrosis depending on the timing of reconstruction salvage. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed 1572 free flaps for head and neck reconstruction from 2010 to 2022. Patients who underwent secondary surgery with flaps after failure of a primary free flap were included. Patients were divided into three groups based on the time for secondary flap reconstruction from the time of primary reconstruction (group A, 0 to 5 days; group B, 6 to 30 days; and group C, >30 days). Results: The authors identified 64 cases of complete flap loss after primary reconstruction requiring secondary reconstruction. Pedicled flaps were used in 34.4% of the cases, whereas a second free flap was used in 65.6% of the cases. Overall, the flap failure rate for secondary reconstructions was 6.7% in group A, 35.3% in group B, and 6.7% in group C (P = 0.022). For free tissue transfer, the success rate of a secondary reconstruction was 92.3% in group A, 28.57% in group B, and 93.3% in group C. Conclusions: The authors favor an early microsurgical reconstruction (≤5 days) following primary reconstruction in cases of free flap failure. If early reconstruction cannot be performed, a deferred reconstruction with free tissue transfer (>30 days) should be considered.

Introduction: Omental cysts are rare abdominal lesions which may be diffi cult to diagnose. The incidence of cystic lesions is about 1 per 140,000 general hospital admissions and about 1 per 20,000 pediatric hospital admissions. Most common presentation is abdominal distension. However, they may be an incidental fi nding or a painless abdominal mass and often mimicking ascites. The presentation is confusing in some cases which may result in mismanagement, added costs and trouble to the patient. Case Report: Here we encountered a case of a large omental cyst which was initially treated as tubercular peritonitis with ascites. The patient also suffered from malnutrition and was diagnosed a case of sickle cell disease adding to the dilemma in the fi nal diagnosis. The USG report also suggested tubercular peritonitis with gross ascites. However, the CT scan suggested of omental cyst which was confi rmed intra operatively and on histopathological examination. The cyst was successfully removed and the patient was discharged. Conclusion: Children presenting with abdominal distension should be carefully investigated to get to the correct diagnosis due to paucity of defi nitive signs and symptoms especially in omental cysts. Despite of all the investigations, the diagnosis may still be a dilemma. USG and CT is keystone in the diagnosis. Finally, once diagnosed an omental cyst can be safely removed.

Introduction Free fibula flap is now regarded as the criterion standard for mandibular reconstruction after oncological resection. However, the results are often confounded due to inappropriate estimate of defect or inappropriate angulation of osteotomy. Three-dimensional (3D) printing and virtual planning can be an effective tool to help in planning osteotomies, therefore simplifying the process. Unfortunately, in developing countries, it is considered to be an expensive and a time-consuming affair, refraining the surgeons to use this technology. We have devised a cheap (less than $35), rapid, and reproducible method for this process that can be performed by residents with the help of the operating surgeon using a freely available software. Materials and Methods The study was conducted over a span of 5 years from 2016 to 2020. Forty patients were randomly categorized into 2 groups of 20 each, one of which underwent conventional free fibula flap and the other group consisted of those for whom 3D printing and virtual planning were used. Aesthetic outcome was measured by preoperative and postoperative CT scans with 3D reconstruction. Furthermore, the reconstruction time and total operative time were also measured in both these groups. Results Comparative study clearly demonstrated a significantly better aesthetic outcome in the 3D printing and virtual planning group. The use of this modality significantly reduced the reconstruction time, which was 83.9 minutes in the cases group and 124 minutes in the control group. Conclusions Three-dimensional printing and virtual planning help to improve the quality of mandibular reconstruction giving a better aesthetic outcome. Besides, it also reduces the operative time and gives us a chance to use prebent implants used for reconstruction. Our methodology is simple, quick, and cost-effective; therefore, we believe that this tool can be incorporated often in free fibula flaps for mandibular reconstruction in developing countries such as ours.