2023
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Timing for Secondary Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Free Flap Failure

Abstract: ree tissue transfer is considered the standard treatment for oncologic reconstruction of head and neck defects, as it has been shown to offer equivalent success rates of flap survival in comparison to regional flaps, with the advantage of optimizing function. [1][2][3][4] The overall rate of a successful free flap for head and neck reconstruction in large centers has been reported to be approximately 95%. 5 Nonetheless, outcomes are generally suboptimal if flaps present vascular complications requiring reexplo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there were three cases of partial failure, involving the skin of a medial femur, a rectus, and a scapula flap, necessitating revision of the anastomoses. Importantly, it is worth highlighting that these failures were not linked to the anastomosis technique itself, but rather the postoperative complications observed were consistent with those commonly encountered in conventional free flap procedures [32,33]. Furthermore, in line with the findings in the existing literature, it appears that intraoral anastomosis techniques exhibit suitability for a wide range of free flaps, without any distinct preferences among them [10,12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Additionally, there were three cases of partial failure, involving the skin of a medial femur, a rectus, and a scapula flap, necessitating revision of the anastomoses. Importantly, it is worth highlighting that these failures were not linked to the anastomosis technique itself, but rather the postoperative complications observed were consistent with those commonly encountered in conventional free flap procedures [32,33]. Furthermore, in line with the findings in the existing literature, it appears that intraoral anastomosis techniques exhibit suitability for a wide range of free flaps, without any distinct preferences among them [10,12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although numerous studies aim to delineate potential risk factors to avoid such complications, the present study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for managing patients who have experienced a total flap loss. 1 The authors examined 64 of 1572 patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction following squamous cell carcinoma resection, specifically focusing on the timing of secondary reconstruction following the flap failure. The authors demonstrate a significantly higher risk of complications when performing reconstruction between 5 and 30 days following the initial resection and free flap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%