No abstract

No abstract

Most medical organizations recommend informed decision making before undergoing prostate cancer screening. The authors conducted a detailed evaluation of men's use of an interactive, Web-based prostate cancer screening decision aid. Participants (N = 531) were 57 years old (SD = 6.8), 37% were African American, and 92% had Internet access. Men completed 2 telephone interviews, pre- and 1-month post-Web site availability. Half of the sample (n = 256) accessed the Web site. Multivariate analysis revealed that users were more likely than nonusers to be White (OR = 2.37, CI 1.6-3.6), previously screened (OR = 2.13, CI 1.07-4.26), have Internet access (OR = 3.66, CI 1.15-11.58), and to report daily Internet use (OR = 2.58, CI 1.47-4.55). Agreement between self-reported and actual Web site use was moderate (κ = .67). Tracking software revealed a mean of 1.3 (SD = 0.5) log-ons and a median of 38 min per log-on. Of participants, 84% used the values clarification tool, and more than 50% viewed each video testimonial. Baseline screening preference was associated with values clarification tool responses and Web site feedback. This study revealed that, beyond the digital divide, Web site use depended on more than Internet access. Further, electronic tracking of Web site use demonstrated overestimation of self-reported use, high use of interactive features, and effect of baseline screening preference on men's response to the Web site.

Background: There is growing evidence for the feasibility of text-based interventions for pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, less is known regarding whether the use of personalized text messages with high-risk youth and their caregivers is associated with improvements in youth health. This study examines the use of diabetes-specific texts and associated health outcomes for participants of the Novel Interventions in Children's Healthcare (NICH) program. Methods:Text messages sent to youth with T1D and their caregivers during NICH intervention were coded regarding diabetes relevance and adherence-related content. Health outcome data (eg, HbA1c values, hospital admissions) prior to and following NICH program enrollment were collected.Results: Fewer than half (43%) of texts sent to patients and their caregivers were identified as being related to diabetes, and over 95% of diabetes-related texts were identified as adherence-related. Participants in the NICH program demonstrated a significant decrease in HbA1c values, t(23) = 2.78, p ≤ .05, and DKA-related hospital visits, t(24) = 2.78, p ≤ .01, during program involvement. Although no relationships were identified between patient-recipient text characteristics and health outcomes, the frequency and type of text messaging with caregivers was significantly associated with changes in health outcomes. Conclusions:This study represents the most extensive evaluation of diabetes-related SMS use and health outcomes for NICH participants to date. Findings demonstrate improvements in patient health during NICH program involvement. Implications include that sending frequent, personalized, and adherence-reinforcing texts to patients' caregivers may result in improved patient health, decreased utilization, and, potentially, associated reductions in health care costs.