Aluminium phosphide (AlP) is a toxic agent associated with a high mortality rate following acute exposure from various routes. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and laboratory findings useful for predicting the medical outcome of AlP-poisoned patients using established scoring systems. This is a prospective study of AlP-poisoned patients from 2010 to 2015 in Ardabil, Iran. All patients that presented with a confirmed diagnosis of acute AlP poisoning in the study interval were included in the study. Clinical and laboratory data, using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems, were compared for their predictive value in determining differences between survived and non-survived patients. Univariate analysis (Mann-Whitney or t-test), multiple logistic regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Pearson correlation test were performed using STATA/SE 13.0 and the Nomolog Software. A total of 68 AlP-poisoned patients with confirmed acute AlP poisoning were included for evaluation. Of these, 36 were non-survived. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed using parameters and values derived from patient clinical and laboratory data, and revealed that four factors were significant for predicting mortality: Glasgow coma score (GCS); systolic blood pressure (SBP); urinary output (UOP); and serum HCO . A four-variable, risk-prediction nomogram was developed for identifying high-risk patients and predicting the risk of mortality. Study results showed that SBP of <92.5 mmHg (p = 0.006); HCO < 12.9 mEq/L (p = 0.01), UOP < 1725 mL/day (p = 0.04); and GCS < 14.5 (p = 0.003) were significant predictors of AlP mortality. Scoring systems analysis showed SAPS II score >24.5, APACHE II score >8.5 and SOFA score >7.5 were predictive of non-survival patients. The results of our study showed that SBP, GCS, UOP and serum HCO levels are the best prognostic factors for predicting mortality in AlP-poisoned patients. According to the area under the ROC curve of the APACHE II score, when compared with SOFA and SAPS II scores, the APACHE II score can more effectively discriminate between non-survivors and survived patients.

No abstract

BackgroundLead (Pb) poisoning among people using opium has been an increasing problem in Iran. The present study highlights the clinical effects of lead toxicity associated with opium use in Iran, Kerman province.MethodsBetween January 2016 and June 2016, patients with signs and symptoms of Pb poisoning were questioned to assess whether they had a history of opium dependency. In total, 249 patients were enrolled onto this cross-sectional study, all were opium dependent. Para-clinical data including blood lead level (BLL), demographic information, user preferences, and symptoms were obtained.ResultsThe patients used either opium (83.9%), refined opium (6.4%) or a combination of both (9.7%) via ingestion (71.9%), smoking (8.4%) or a combination of both (19.7%). The overall median BLL was 80.0 μg/dL [IQR: 51.7–119.0]. The median BLL did not differ significantly between opium and refined opium users. Further, BLL was not significantly affected by the type of substance, route of use, duration of use, or daily quantity consumed. Common symptoms included abdominal pain (86.9%), constipation (75.8%), anorexia (71.5%) and nausea (54.7%). Linear regression analysis showed log of BLL was significantly associated with abdominal pain, myalgia and anorexia.ConclusionsThe study unravelled an increase in opium-related Pb poisoning in the Kerman province. Raised awareness of this emerging Pb source and investigation of its aetiology is recommended. Pb poisoning should be considered among the primary differential diagnosis of opium users with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Background: In Iran, as in many other Asian and Middle Eastern countries, some believe that opium has beneficial effects on cardiovascular system. Dependent patients suppose that opium has positive effects on cardiovascular function and can prevent or improve cardiovascular diseases; however, only few comprehensive studies evaluating such effects have been performed. Objectives: In this study, we sought to clarify the effect of opium on cardiovascular problems by incorporating the previous findings and the current information on the issue and to explain the possible mechanisms of this effect. Methods: The available human studies published up to October 30, 2019, were searched in different databases. Case-control, cohort, and cross-sectional studies were retrieved. Papers published in English or those with an English abstract were included. The risk of bias for each included study was assessed based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). We then categorized the effects of opium on cardiovascular problems along with its probable underlying mechanisms of action. Results: In this study, most of the published articles suggested the adverse effects of opium on the cardiovascular system, including atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, low ejection fraction, and cardiovascular mortality; however, some articles reported the beneficial or impartial effects of opium on the cardiovascular system. In this article, we have categorized all the effects of opium on cardiovascular system; also, the proposed mechanisms of action of opium in each of the above-mentioned disorders are summarized. Conclusion: Although the available evidences were incoherent, it was mostly suggested that opium use does not protect against or improve cardiovascular problems.

Background: Lead, one of the most widely used metals because of its beneficial physical properties, has been reported to adversely influence several different organs and organ systems. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of lead exposure on liver and renal function and haematologic parameters. Methods: This was a case-cohort study comparing adults with occupational, environmental or opium-related lead exposure with blood lead levels [BLL] >10 μg/ dL (High blood lead level (HBLL) group and age-and gender-matched normal healthy individuals (Low blood lead level [LBLL] group with BLL <10 μg/dL). The complete blood count and concentrations of serum creatinine, urea, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were recorded for subsequent investigation. Results: The mean BLL was significantly higher in the HBLL than in the LBLL groups (51.36 ± 44.72 vs 4.17 ± 1.97 µg/dL). The Spearman's rho revealed a significant association between BLL and urea (r = 0.25, P < 0.001), creatinine (r = 0.16, P = 0.02), AST (r = 0.42, P < 0.001) and ALT (r = 0.27, P < 0.001). The median [IQR] serum urea (34 mg/dL [27-221]) vs (30 [27-36]), creatinine (0.9 mg/dL [0.8-1]) vs (0.8 [0.7-0.9]), ALT (25 mg/dL [16-49]) vs (22 [16-30]) and AST concentrations (29 mg/dL [20-42]) vs (20 [18-24]) were all significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the HBLL group compared to the LBLL group.The median ]) vs (15.2 [14.6-16.3] and haematocrit (36.9% [31-44.8]) vs (45.6 [43.6-48.2]) were both significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the HBLL group than in the LBLL group. Conclusion: The results indicated that people with chronic lead exposure with BLLs greater than 10 μg/dL are at risk of renal, liver and haematologic impairments.

No abstract

Aims As an analgesic that acts upon the central nervous system (CNS), tramadol has gained popularity in treating moderate to severe pain. Recently, it has been increasingly reported as a drug of misuse with intentional overdoses or intoxications. This review focuses on tramadol intoxication in humans and its effects on different systems. Subject and method This narrative review provides a comprehensive view of the pharmacokinetics, mechanism of action, and incidence of tramadol toxicity with an in-depth look at its side effects. In addition, the main approaches to the management of tramadol poisoning are described. Results Tramadol poisoning can affect multiple organ systems: gastrointestinal, central nervous system (seizure, CNS depression, low-grade coma, anxiety, and over time anoxic brain damage), cardiovascular system (palpitation, mild hypertension to life-threatening complications such as cardiopulmonary arrest), respiratory system, renal system (renal failure with higher doses of tramadol intoxication), musculoskeletal system (rhabdomyolysis), endocrine system (hypoglycemia), as well as, cause serotonin syndrome. Seizure, a serious nervous disturbance, is more common in tramadol intoxication than with other opioids. Fatal tramadol intoxications are uncommon, except in ingestion cases concurrent with other medications, particularly CNS depressants, most commonly benzodiazepines, and ethanol. Conclusion With the increasing popularity of tramadol, physicians must be aware of its adverse effects, substantial abuse potential, and drug interactions, to weigh its risk–benefit ratio for pain management. Alternative therapies might be considered in patients with a previous overdose history to reduce risks for adverse outcomes.

No abstract