Purpose: Oral mucositis is a common acute morbidity associated with radiation and/or chemotherapy treatment for cancer. D-Methionine (D-Met), the dextro-isomer of the common amino acid L-methionine, has been documented to protect normal tissues from a diverse array of oxidative insults. Experimental Design: We evaluated if D-Met could selectively prevent radiation-induced oral mucositis using in vitro cell culture models as well as an in vivo model of radiation injury to the oral mucosa in C3H mice. Results: Unlike free-radical scavengers, which protected both normal and transformed tumor cells in vitro from radiation-induced cell death, treatment with D-Met in culture protected nontransformed primary human cells from radiation-induced cell death (protective factor between 1.2 and 1.6; P < 0.05) whereas it did not confer a similar protection on transformed tumor cells. D-Met treatment also provided significant protection to normal human fibroblasts, but not to tumor cell lines, from radiation-induced loss of clonogenicity (protection factor,1.6 F 0.15). D-Met treatment did not alter DNA damage (as measured by histone phosphorylation) following irradiation but seemed to selectively mitigate the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in nontransformed cells, whereas it did not provide a similar protection to tumor cells.Tumor control of implanted xenografts treated with radiation or concurrent cisplatin and radiation was not altered by D-Met treatment. Pharmacokinetics following administration of a liquid suspension of D-Met in rats showed 68% bioavailability relative to i.v. administration. Finally, in a murine modelof mucositis, a dose-dependent increase inprotection was observed with the protective factor increasing from 1.6 to 2.6 over a range of oral D-Met doses between 200 and 500 mg/kg (P < 0.0003).Conclusions: D-Met protected normal tissues, but not tumor cells, in culture from radiationinduced cell death; it also protected normal cells from radiation-induced mucosal injury in a murine model but did not alter tumor response to therapy. Further studies on the use of D-Met to protect from oral mucositis are warranted.
Ascorbic acid (AA) exhibits significant anticancer activity at pharmacologic doses achievable by parenteral administration that have minimal effects on normal cells. Thus, AA has potential uses as a chemotherapeutic agent alone or in combination with other therapeutics that specifically target cancer-cell metabolism. We compared the effects of AA and combinations of AA with the glycolysis inhibitor 3-(3-pyridinyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one (3-PO) on the viability of three non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines to the effects on an immortalized lung epithelial cell line. AA concentrations of 0.5 to 5 mM caused a complete loss of viability in all NSCLC lines compared to a <10% loss of viability in the lung epithelial cell line. Combinations of AA and 3-PO synergistically enhanced cell death in all NSCLC cell lines at concentrations well below the IC50 concentrations for each compound alone. A synergistic interaction was not observed in combination treatments of lung epithelial cells and combination treatments that caused a complete loss of viability in NSCLC cells had modest effects on normal lung cell viability and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Combination treatments induced dramatically higher ROS levels compared to treatment with AA and 3-PO alone in NSCLC cells and combination-induced cell death was inhibited by addition of catalase to the medium. Analyses of DNA fragmentation, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage, annexin V-binding, and caspase activity demonstrated that AA-induced cell death is caused via the activation of apoptosis and that the combination treatments caused a synergistic induction of apoptosis. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of AA against NSCLC cells and that combinations of AA with 3-PO synergistically induce apoptosis via a ROS-dependent mechanism. These results support further evaluation of pharmacologic concentrations of AA as an adjuvant treatment for NSCLC and that combination of AA with glycolysis inhibitors may be a promising therapy for the treatment of NSCLC.
Arsenic (As) is a known human carcinogen; however, very little is known about the health consequences of occupational exposure to As. In the present study, we assessed the genotoxic damage in the blood cells and in the buccal cells of south Indian glass factory workers who are occupationally exposed to As. The As content in the whole blood of 200 workers and 165 controls was evaluated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Blood leukocytes from the subjects were monitored for the level of DNA damage using the Comet assay (mean comet tail length); buccal cells were used to determine the frequency of micronuclei (MN). The mean As concentration was significantly higher in the workers (56.76 microg/L) than in the controls (11.74 microg/L) (P < 0.001). The workers also had increased frequencies of MN in the buccal cells and increased levels of DNA damage in leukocytes compared to the controls (P < 0.001). There were significant correlations between the genotoxicity endpoints that were evaluated and blood As concentration, smoking, age, and the duration of working in the factory. Also, a significant correlation was observed between the frequency of MN and comet tail-length for the worker samples. Our findings indicate that chronic occupational exposure to As is genotoxic and that the Comet assay and micronucleus test are useful assays for evaluating genotoxicity in humans occupationally exposed to As.
Supplementary Data from Evaluation of d-Methionine as a Novel Oral Radiation Protector for Prevention of Mucositis
<div>Abstract<p><b>Purpose:</b> Oral mucositis is a common acute morbidity associated with radiation and/or chemotherapy treatment for cancer. d-Methionine (d-Met), the dextro-isomer of the common amino acid l-methionine, has been documented to protect normal tissues from a diverse array of oxidative insults.</p><p><b>Experimental Design:</b> We evaluated if d-Met could selectively prevent radiation-induced oral mucositis using <i>in vitro</i> cell culture models as well as an <i>in vivo</i> model of radiation injury to the oral mucosa in C3H mice.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Unlike free-radical scavengers, which protected both normal and transformed tumor cells <i>in vitro</i> from radiation-induced cell death, treatment with d-Met in culture protected nontransformed primary human cells from radiation-induced cell death (protective factor between 1.2 and 1.6; <i>P</i> < 0.05) whereas it did not confer a similar protection on transformed tumor cells. d-Met treatment also provided significant protection to normal human fibroblasts, but not to tumor cell lines, from radiation-induced loss of clonogenicity (protection factor, 1.6 ± 0.15). d-Met treatment did not alter DNA damage (as measured by histone phosphorylation) following irradiation but seemed to selectively mitigate the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in nontransformed cells, whereas it did not provide a similar protection to tumor cells. Tumor control of implanted xenografts treated with radiation or concurrent cisplatin and radiation was not altered by d-Met treatment. Pharmacokinetics following administration of a liquid suspension of d-Met in rats showed 68% bioavailability relative to i.v. administration. Finally, in a murine model of mucositis, a dose-dependent increase in protection was observed with the protective factor increasing from 1.6 to 2.6 over a range of oral d-Met doses between 200 and 500 mg/kg (<i>P</i> < 0.0003).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b>d-Met protected normal tissues, but not tumor cells, in culture from radiation-induced cell death; it also protected normal cells from radiation-induced mucosal injury in a murine model but did not alter tumor response to therapy. Further studies on the use of d-Met to protect from oral mucositis are warranted.</p></div>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.