Four groups of samples were analysed. 1st group consists 52 normal female (cancer free women), 2nd group consists 38 BC patients without bone metastasis, 3rd group consists 27 breast cancer patients with limited bone metastasis (3 or less than 3 skeletal lesions) and 4th group consists 35 breast cancer patients with extensive bone metastasis (4 or more than 4 skeletal lesions), conformed by whole body skeletal scintigraphy with Technetium99m MDP. One way ANOVA was used to compare serum TRACP5b and serum ALP among these groups. Both serum TRACP5b and serum ALP are not markedly elevated in limited bone metastasis but are strongly elevated in extensive bone metastasis (p < 0.0001). As seen in this study the biochemical bone resorption marker, serum TRACP5b, abnormally increased in extensive bone metastasis of breast cancer patients and can be used as a specific marker for bone metastasis in lieu of radiological tools.
The objective of this study was to delineate the usefulness of clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute knee injuries. We aim to establish whether the time period post acute knee injury is related to the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination and to investigate the strength of specific clinical examination findings in predicting a clinically relevant MRI abnormality. Seventy patients were referred to fracture clinic with an acute knee injury who subsequently went on to be investigated with MRI over 12 months. These patients were retrospectively analyzed looking at the time period they were reviewed, the components that were assessed at physical examination, and the results of their eventual MRI scan looking for any correlation. A greater proportion of patients who were examined at 2 weeks had relevant positive findings on MRI scan, = 0.03. Range of movement and lateral joint line tenderness were not associated with a positive MRI scan at any period after injury. The presence of a moderate to large effusion wasnot associated with an MRI abnormality if the examination was within 2 weeks of injury but was if present 2 weeks after injury, = 0.0001. Range of movement should not form part of the decision making on whether an injury should be investigated with MRI. Joint effusion in isolation within 2 weeks after injury should not be an indication for MRI but a repeat clinical examination in 2 weeks, where if still present, should be investigated with MRI.
We describe a rare case of recurrent laryngeal nerve neuritis secondary to sarcoidosis. A 40-year-old woman presented with persistent dysphonia. This was her first episode of dysphonia with no reports of laryngeal trauma. Fibre-optic laryngoscopy revealed a normal nasal passage, nasopharynx and pharynx. The supraglottic structures were all unremarkable; however, inspection of the true vocal cords revealed a left vocal cord palsy that was identified as being in a paramedian position. Radiological investigation showed mediastinal adenopathy that measured up to 20 mm in the short axis diameter. Histological examination showed granulomatous lymphadenitis of the lymph node with a central area of sclerosis surrounded by discrete, non-caseating granuloma. Stains for acid-fast bacilli were negative. The morphological features were suggestive of sarcoidosis. The lymphadenopathy distribution and size did not suggest left recurrent laryngeal nerve compression, giving a subsequent diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve neuritis secondary to sarcoidosis.
Hip fracture patients are vulnerable to the outcomes of COVID-19. We performed a cross-sectional survey to determine measures employed to limit nosocomial spread of COVID-19 in 23 orthopaedic trauma hospitals in North-West England. 19 (87%) hospitals admitted patients to a ward prior to a negative swab, and only 9 (39%) were barrier nursed. Hip fracture patients were operated in non-COVID-19 free theatres in 21 (91%) hospitals. Regular screening of doctors working in trauma and elective areas for COVID-19 was undertaken in 3 (13%) and 5 (22%) hospitals, respectively. Doctors moved freely between trauma and elective areas in 22 (96%) hospitals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.