Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity worldwide. Myocardial reperfusion is known as an effective therapeutic choice against AMI. However, reperfusion of blood flow induces ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury through different complex processes including ion accumulation, disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential, the formation of reactive oxygen species, and so forth. One of the processes that gets activated in response to I/R injury is autophagy. Indeed, autophagy acts as a “double‐edged sword” in the pathology of myocardial I/R injury and there is a controversy about autophagy being beneficial or detrimental. On the basis of the autophagy effect and regulation on myocardial I/R injury, many studies targeted it as a therapeutic strategy. In this review, we discuss the role of autophagy in I/R injury and its targeting as a therapeutic strategy.
The immunosuppressive features of tumor lesions participate not only as one of the major players inducing cancer progression but also a big challenge for effective immunotherapy. It has been found that immunosuppression associated with chronic inflammatory factors, such as growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines is generated by stroma and tumor cells. Chronic and exhaustive secretion of these mediators triggers the generation of myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) demonstrating one of the key players engaged in tumor immunosuppression. In point of fact, direct cell‐to‐cell contact is a prerequisite for immunosuppressive functions of MDSCs. From the clinical perspective, the frequency of peripheral blood MDSCs is correlated with clinical stage and therapeutic response in various cancers. Furthermore, MDSCs are involved in chemoresistant settings. Altogether, it is a rational therapeutic approach to block the fierce cycle in which MDSCs are developed and infiltrated to favor cancer progression. In this review, we will summarize recent findings of MDSCs in tumor progression and discuss potential therapeutic strategies that could be evaluated in future clinical trials.
Introduction: Gold standard method for Mycobacterium tuberculosis identification is microbial culture, but this method can cause cross-contaminations. In the present study we aimed to investigate possible cross-contaminations in two main tuberculosis laboratories in Northwest of Iran.Methods: One hundred and fifty-six isolates from two central tuberculosis laboratories were investigated by IS6110-RFLP and VNTR-ETR methods.Results: 53 isolates were clustered in 18 clusters. 15 isolates were smear negative and single culture positive among which four isolates were suspected to be contaminated and in two isolates (1.28%) contaminations were confirmed.Conclusion: With this confirmation clustered isolates reduced from 53 isolates to 49 isolates and recent transmission rate of tuberculosis reduced to 21.2%. This study showed genotyping smear negative and single culture positive isolates can prevent unnecessary treatments and for this purpose VNTR-ETR is a suitable method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.