No abstract

Objective The aims of this study were (1) to provide an overview of craniocervical magnetic resonance imaging (MR) findings following nonfatal strangulation (NFS), (2) to detect the time dependency of the presence of these findings, and (3) to explore the additional value of MR with regard to the forensic interpretation of NFS. Methodology All 633 victims of manual strangulation between October 2011 and March 2018 were examined, including the case history and external findings. Following written consent, 114 cases were included in the study. The duration between the event, clinical forensic examination, and MR was noted. Radiologic images were reviewed by a clinical and a forensic radiologist. ResultsThe case group consisted of 90 women and 24 men with a mean age of 32.5 years. Delimitable external findings were present in 93% (N = 106) of cases. MR yielded a positive finding in 43% of cases (N = 49). There was no significant difference in the mean time interval between examinations between MR-positive and MR-negative cases. Perilaryngeal fluid accumulation was associated with difficulty swallowing and victims put in a chokehold. All cerebral MR were unremarkable, except for one patient with edema of the corpus callosum. Conclusions The role of craniocervical MR following NFS is currently limited, particularly with regard to the forensic interpretation of NFS. MR may reveal internal injury in victims who report subjective symptoms of airway compression and in those who were placed in a chokehold. The presence of MR findings is not dependent on immediate examinations following the assault. Key Points• Magnetic resonance imaging does not currently provide additional value for the estimation of the severity of nonfatal manual strangulation.• Magnetic resonance imaging of the neck may reveal internal injury in cases without external findings, particularly in victims placed in a chokehold and with symptoms of airway compression. • The incidence of carotid artery dissections and laryngeal fractures is low in victims of nonfatal manual strangulation.

Background To assess changes of the craniocervical junction (CCJ), computed tomography (CT) is considered the reference standard. Recent advances in bone depiction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enable high‐quality visualization of osseous structures. Consequently, MRI may serve as an alternative to CT, without the use of ionizing radiation. Purpose To compare two MRI sequences optimized for bone visualization to the CT reference standard in the assessment of the osseous CCJ. Study Type Prospective. Population/Subjects Twenty‐seven decedents and five healthy volunteers. Field Strength/Sequence 3T/ultrashort‐echo time gradient echo (UTE) and optimized 3D‐multiecho in‐phase gradient echo sequences (FRACTURE). Assessment All decedents were scanned with both MRI sequences and CT. Three observers rated degeneration to obtain a score for the upper (atlanto‐dental and left/right atlanto‐occipital joint) and for the lower part of the CCJ (left and right atlanto‐axial joint). Two reader rated the following quantitative parameters: basion‐axial‐interval, atlanto‐dental‐interval, atlanto‐occipital‐interval, Powers‐ratio, and signal/contrast‐to‐noise‐ratio. As a proof of concept, five healthy volunteers were scanned with both MRI sequences. Statistical Tests Degeneration was assessed on a Likert scale by three independent observers. Interrater and intermodality reliability were calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient. To compare distance measurements between examination methods, a Friedman test, between‐degenerative ratings, and a Kruskal–Wallis test were performed. Results Degenerative ratings of the CCJ between MRI sequences and CT showed a good interrater and intermodality agreement. MRI sequences tended to underestimate the degree of degeneration compared to CT, and this became more marked with increasing degeneration severity. There were no significant relationships between distance measurements and the degree of degeneration (PCT = 0.62, PUTE = 0.64, PFRACTURE = 0.67). The in vivo examination proved the feasibility of both MRI methods in a clinical setting. Data Conclusion Quantitative and qualitative ratings on MR images were comparable to CT images; thus, MRI may be a valid alternative to CT assessing the CCJ. Level of Evidence 1. Technical Efficacy Stage 3.

No abstract