Leptospira spp. are delicate bacteria that cannot be studied by usual microbiological methods. They cause leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease transmitted to humans through infected urine of wild or domestic animals. We studied the incidence of this disease in the Uruguayan population, its epidemiologic and clinical features, and compared diagnostic techniques. After examining 6,778 suspect cases, we estimated that about 15 infections/100,000 inhabitants occurred yearly, affecting mainly young male rural workers. Awareness about leptospirosis has grown among health professionals, and its lethality has consequently decreased. Bovine infections were probably the principal source of human disease. Rainfall volumes and floods were major factors of varying incidence. Most patients had fever, asthenia, myalgias or cephalalgia, with at least one additional abnormal clinical feature. 30-40% of confirmed cases presented abdominal signs and symptoms, conjunctival suffusion and altered renal or urinary function. Jaundice was more frequent in patients aged > 40 years. Clinical infections followed an acute pattern and their usual outcome was complete recovery. Laboratory diagnosis was based on indirect micro-agglutination standard technique (MAT). Second serum samples were difficult to obtain, often impairing completion of diagnosis. Immunofluorescence was useful as a screening test and for early detection of probable infections.

Introduction: Assays based on DNA amplification can provide information that contributes to the initial management of patients with leptospirosis. However, these have not been adopted in Uruguay. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of the lipL32 real-time PCR (qPCR) for diagnosis of leptospirosis. Methodology: We analyzed by microscopic agglutination test (MAT) and lipL32 qPCR serum samples from 183 patients with suspected leptospirosis. To establish the analytical sensitivity of the qPCR, experimentally spiked samples with known amounts of Leptospira interrogans were analyzed. Results: The analytical sensitivity of the qPCR was 10 2 leptospires/mL. In 98 patients MAT results were negative meanwhile 85 showed positive reactions, revealing acute infections. Twenty six acute-phase sera of these 85 patients showed a positive signal by qPCR (diagnostic sensitivity 30%). In these patients the average time between onset of symptoms and collection of the first sample was 8 days. In patients with negative results for qPCR and positive MAT results (n=59) the average interval between onset of symptoms and collection of the first sample was 13 days. The qPCR did not yield false positive results. Conclusions: The qPCR had a lower diagnostic sensitivity than MAT and a higher cost. However, it allowed to make an early diagnosis in 26 patients. In patients with confirmed acute infections and negative results by qPCR, more than 8 days had elapsed between the onset of the illness and extraction of the first serum sample. Our data support that the qPCR from sera have clinical utility within the first week of illness.

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Ser315Thr substitution in isoniazid (INH)-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Uruguay. The katG gene of 62 INH-resistant strains was analysed by an RFLP-PCR assay. PCR products were digested with MspI to detect Ser315Thr and Arg463Leu substitutions. A total of 16 of the 62 (26 %) INH-resistant strains analysed had a Ser315Thr substitution. Only one INH-resistant strain had an Arg463Leu substitution and two strains had a deletion in katG. Of the 16 strains with Ser315Thr, 15 showed different profiles using a double-repetitive-element PCR assay, demonstrating that there was no local dissemination of any particular strain. These findings are in agreement with published data from regions where the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) is intermediate and may be due in part to the success of the local TB control programme.