Graphical abstract
Drastic measures such as lockdown imposed in the countries worldwide to control the extent of
COVID-19
have influenced environmental parameters substantially. The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of lockdown on the air quality in Hyderabad city by comparing the pollutants concentration during lockdown and pre-lockdown periods. A comparative study was also made on the pollutant concentrations observed during the pre-lockdown (1st February – 23rd March 2020) and lockdown period (24th March - 30th April 2020) to those of the pollutants in the previous years (2018 and 2019). The Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to correlate the ozone (O
3
) concentration with other pollutants. Carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NO
X
) and O
3
were monitored along with meteorological parameters like temperature, relative humidity and solar radiation. It was observed that the O
3
concentration increased from 26 ppb (by volume) to 56.4 ppb during pre-lockdown and lockdown period, respectively, due to the decrease in CO and NO
X
concentration. The concentration of NO
2,
NO and CO were also reduced during the lockdown period by 33.7%, 53.8% and 27.25%, respectively. To identify the statistical significance of the parameters, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. The present study provides new insights on the ambient air pollution in terms of the aforesaid parameters and could pave the way for regulatory authorities to implement control measures to curb the air pollution.
Highlights
• COVID-19 lockdown improved the air quality by the reduction in air pollutants leading to increased ozone concentration.
• Pearson model was used to correlate the ozone (O
3
) with oxides of nitrogen (NO
X
), CO and other meteorological parameters.
• NO
X
and carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations were reduced by 33.7 % and 27.25 %, respectively, due to COVID lockdown.
Colour removal of pulp plant ef¯uent was studied using white rot fungus, Trametes (Coriolus) versicolor. The batch experiments were carried out using fungus in the form of mycelial pellets. In the present investigation, the effect of pH, concentrations of glucose (substrate), initial ef¯uent colour and ammonium chloride (nutrient) on colour removal ef®ciency were studied. It was found that the maximum colour removal ef®ciency of 82.5% was obtained with an optimal glucose and ammonium chloride concentrations of 15 g/l and 0.5 g/l respectively at a pH of 4.5 without diluting the ef¯uent.
During leather processing in tanneries, considerable amount of wastes with organic and inorganic pollutants are generated. For removal of these pollutants and recovery of water, biological treatment methods and reverse osmosis (RO) based membrane technologies are adopted. While recovering water from treated tannery effluent using RO membranes, presence of residual organics, dye molecules, and other impurities in the effluent have been reported as the major drawback which leads to membrane fouling and failure. In this study, an attempt was made to improve the quality of the treated tannery effluent by subjecting the secondary treated tannery effluent by ozonation alone and ozonation of primary and secondary treated tannery effluent followed by aerobic biological Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR). Maximum color reduction of 98% at pH value of 12 with ozonation alone was observed for secondary treated tannery effluent. Ozonation of secondary treated tannery effluent followed by further biological treatment in aerobic SBR increased the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal rate and resulted in COD values less than 300 mg/L. In case of primary treated tannery effluent, maximum COD reduction of 64% was achieved in SBR.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.