We investigated the possibility of ultrastructural damage to human spermatozoa induced by different sperm preparation techniques. Ejaculates from 20 normozoospermic men were divided into equal aliquots and processed by glass wool filtration, Percoll density gradient centrifugation, and a simple two-step centrifugation procedure which served as a control. The evaluation of 60 spermatozoa from each of 20 test subjects (in all, n = 1200) ensured that a sufficiently large number of spermatozoa were investigated. Ultrastructural damage was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. We investigated the state of the acrosome after sperm preparation and measured the percentage of intact spermatozoal structures compared with that of the control. Compared with Percoll density gradient centrifugation, glass wool filtration yielded a significantly increased proportion of intact acrosomes. However, both preparations gave significantly better results than the control. In conclusion, both glass wool filtration and Percoll centrifugation are efficient techniques for the accumulation of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes. Because of the significantly higher percentage of intact acrosomes, glass wool filtration appears to be the more appropriate method. The significance of the conspicuous bending of sperm tails after Percoll centrifugation is not yet known.
We investigated the possibility of ultrastructural damage to human spermatozoa induced by different sperm preparation techniques. Ejaculates from 20 normozoospermic men were divided into equal aliquots and processed by glass wool filtration, Percoll density gradient centrifugation, and a simple two-step centrifugation procedure which served as a control. Ultrastructural damage was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Compared with Percoll density gradient centrifugation, glass wool filtration yielded a significantly increased proportion of intact acrosomes (p < 0.05). However, both preparations gave significantly better results than control (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for glass wool filtration and Percoll centrifugation, respectively). The significance of the conspicuous bending of sperm tails after Percoll centrifugation is not yet known. In conclusion, both glass wool filtration and Percoll centrifugation are efficient techniques for the accumulation of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes. Because of the higher sperm recovery rate, glass wool filtration appears to be the more appropriate method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.