Verursachen Präparationstechniken ultrastrukturelle Spermienschäden?

Abstract

We investigated the possibility of ultrastructural damage to human spermatozoa induced by different sperm preparation techniques. Ejaculates from 20 normozoospermic men were divided into equal aliquots and processed by glass wool filtration, Percoll density gradient centrifugation, and a simple two-step centrifugation procedure which served as a control. Ultrastructural damage was assessed by scanning electron microscopy. Compared with Percoll density gradient centrifugation, glass wool filtration yielded a significantly increased proportion of intact acrosomes (p < 0.05). However, both preparations gave significantly better results than control (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01 for glass wool filtration and Percoll centrifugation, respectively). The significance of the conspicuous bending of sperm tails after Percoll centrifugation is not yet known. In conclusion, both glass wool filtration and Percoll centrifugation are efficient techniques for the accumulation of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes. Because of the higher sperm recovery rate, glass wool filtration appears to be the more appropriate method.