Purpose-To quantify the differences between planned and delivered parotid gland and target doses, and to assess the benefits of daily bone alignment for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods and Materials-Eleven head-and-neck cancer patients received 2 CT scans/week with an in-room CT scanner over their course of radiotherapy. The clinical IMRT plans, designed with 3-4mm planning margins, were recalculated on the repeat CT images. The plans were aligned using (1) the actual treatment isocenter marked with radiopaque markers (BB) and (2) bone alignment to the cervical vertebrae to simulate image-guided setup. In-house deformable image registration software was used to map daily dose distributions to the original treatment plan and to calculate a cumulative, delivered dose distribution for each patient.Results-Using conventional BB alignment led to increases in the parotid gland mean dose above the planned dose by 5-7Gy in 45% of the patients (median = 3.0Gy ipsilateral (p=0.026); median = 1.0Gy contralateral (p=0.016)). Use of bone alignment led to reductions relative to BB alignment in 91% of patients (median=2Gy; range=0.3-8.3Gy; 15 of 22 parotids improved). However, the parotid dose from bone alignment was still greater than planned (median=1.0Gy (p=0.007)). Neither approach affected tumor dose coverage.Conclusions-With conventional BB alignment, the parotid gland mean dose was significantly increased above the planned mean dose. Using daily bone alignment reduced the parotid dose compared to BB alignment in almost all patients. A 3-4 mm planning margin was adequate for tumor dose coverage.Correspondence and reprint requests to:

Background-The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to achieve favorable disease-control rates while minimizing parotid gland doses in patients treated for small primary tumors of the oropharynx.

No abstract

No abstract

The Collaborative Working Group (CWG) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) electron beam treatment planning contract has performed a set of 14 experiments that measured dose distributions for 28 unique beam-phantom configurations that simulated various patient anatomic structures and beam geometries. Multiple dose distributions were measured with film or diode detectors for each configuration, resulting in 78, 2-D planar dose distributions and one, 1-D depth-dose distribution. Measurements were made for 9- and 20-MeV electron beams, using primarily 6 x 6- and 15 x 15-cm applicators at several SSDs. Dose distributions were measured for shaped fields, irregular surfaces, and inhomogeneities (1-D, 2-D, and 3-D), which were designed to simulate many clinical electron treatments. The data were corrected for asymmetries, and normalized in an absolute manner. This set of measured data can be used for verification of electron beam dose algorithms and is available to others for that purpose.

No abstract

No abstract

A procedure has been developed using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) to verify that the center of a patient's lesion is aligned with the center of a treatment cone prior to treatment in a linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery procedure. The coordinates of the lesion center are set on the Brown-Roberts-Wells phantom base using a target simulator. A 3 mm tungsten ball, mounted on the target simulator, is used as the reference point for the planned isocenter. The target simulator is then attached to an adapter mounted on the linac couch, and an EPID image of the simulated target is acquired. The center of the circular-shaped radiation field is calculated from the centroid of the segmented EPID image, and the center of the tungsten ball is identified by an automated computer search algorithm. A summation filter is used to find the position of the lowest radiation intensity coincident with the center of the ball. The alignment error is defined as the difference between the center of the radiation field and the center of the ball. The accuracy of this method was tested and found to be within 0.2 mm. The advantage of the EPID-based procedure is that it can give quantitative offset values quickly for immediate readjustment. We have found that the method is also a convenient tool for testing room laser alignment and the accuracy of the treatment cones.