Aims To characterize tadalafil plasma pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects following single and multiple doses. Methods Noncompartmental parameters were calculated for healthy subjects receiving a single 2.5–20‐mg tadalafil dose in 13 clinical pharmacology studies. An integrated statistical analysis of results in 237 subjects provided global averages and an assessment of effects of body mass index (BMI), age, gender and smoking status. Diurnal variation, food effects and proportionality of exposure to dose were analysed in three studies. Multiple‐dose pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a separate study in which parallel groups of 15 subjects received 10 or 20 mg tadalafil once daily for 10 days. Results Tadalafil was absorbed rapidly with mean Cmax (378 µg l−1 for 20 mg) observed at 2 h; thereafter, concentrations declined nearly monoexponentially with a mean (5th, 95th percentiles) t1/2 of 17.5 (11.5, 29.6) hours. Mean oral clearance (CL/F) was 2.48 (1.35, 4.35) l h−1 and apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F) was 62.6 (39.5, 92.1) l. No clinically meaningful effect of BMI, age, gender or smoking was identified. Exposure was not substantially affected by time of dosing. Food had negligible effects on bioavailability as assessed by 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC mean ratios. Parameters were proportional to dose, indicating that doubling the dose doubled exposure. Steady state was attained by day 5 following once‐daily administration, and accumulation (1.6‐fold) was consistent with the t1/2. Conclusions Tadalafil pharmacokinetics are linear with respect to dose and time, and are not affected by food. Systemic clearance is low relative to other phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors.

The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefepime (1000 mg over 30 minutes) were studied in 5 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with various degrees of renal impairment. Cefepime concentrations in plasma, urine, and hemodialysate were assayed using reverse-phase HPLC with ultraviolet detection. Mean peak plasma concentrations of cefepime at the end of 30-minute infusion ranges from 63.5 to 73.9 micrograms/ml and were not affected by the degree of renal impairment. The half-life of cefepime was approximately 2.3 hours in subjects with normal kidney function; it increased proportionately as renal function decreased. Significant linear relationships between total body clearance and creatinine clearance, as well as renal clearance and creatinine clearance, were observed. The mean volume of distribution at steady state in healthy volunteers was 20.5 liters and was not significantly altered in subjects with renal insufficiency. The mean cumulative urinary recovery of cefepime in healthy volunteers was 82.9% of the administered dose and significantly decreased in subjects with creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min. Hemodialysis significantly shortened the elimination half-life from 13.5 hours during the predialysis period to 2.3 hours during the dialysis period. Cefepime dosage should be reduced in proportion to the decline in creatinine clearance.

High development costs and low success rates in bringing new medicines to the market demand more efficient and effective approaches. Identified by the FDA as a valuable prognostic tool for fulfilling such a demand, model-based drug development is a mathematical and statistical approach that constructs, validates, and utilizes disease models, drug exposure-response models, and pharmacometric models to facilitate drug development. Quantitative pharmacology is a discipline that learns and confirms the key characteristics of new molecular entities in a quantitative manner, with goal of providing explicit, reproducible, and predictive evidence for optimizing drug development plans and enabling critical decision making. Model-based drug development serves as an integral part of quantitative pharmacology. This work reviews the general concept, basic elements, and evolving role of model-based drug development in quantitative pharmacology. Two case studies are presented to illustrate how the model-based drug development approach can facilitate knowledge management and decision making during drug development. The case studies also highlight the organizational learning that comes through implementation of quantitative pharmacology as a discipline. Finally, the prospects of quantitative pharmacology as an emerging discipline are discussed. Advances in this discipline will require continued collaboration between academia, industry and regulatory agencies.

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime in 31 young, healthy volunteers were assessed after the administration of single and multiple 250-, 500-, 1,000-, or 2,000-mg intravenous doses. Each subject received a single dose of cefepime via a 30-min intravenous infusion on day 1 of the study. Starting from day 2, subjects received multiple doses of cefepime every 8 h for 9 days, and on the morning of day 11, they received the last dose. Serial blood and urine samples were collected after administration of the first dose and on days 1, 6, and 11. Cefepime concentrations in plasma and urine were assayed by using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Data were evaluated by noncompartmental methods to determine pharmacokinetic parameters. The mean half-life of cefepime was approximately 2 h and did not vary with the dose or duration of dosing. The regression analyses of peak levels (Cm.) in plasma at the end of the 30-min intravenous infusion and the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC>o.) showed a dose-proportional response. The steady-state volume of distribution (V,,) was approximately 18 liters and was independent of the administered dose. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic data are suggestive of a lack of accumulation or change in clearance of cefepime on repeated dosing. Cefepime was excreted primarily unchanged in urine. The recovery of intact cefepime in urine was invariant with respect to the dose and accounted for over 80%o of the dose. The values for renal clearance ranged from 99 to 132 ml/min and were suggestive of glomerular filtration as the primary excretion mechanism. It is concluded that cefepime exhibits linear phannacokinetics in healthy subjects.

The proposed method enhances the information from a clinical dose-proportionality study and helps to standardize decision rules.

In vitro results suggested that tadalafil would have little effect on the pharmacokinetics of drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Clinical studies demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics of 2 different CYP3A substrates, midazolam and lovastatin, were virtually unchanged after tadalafil coadministration. Thus therapeutic concentrations of tadalafil do not produce clinically significant changes in the clearance of drugs metabolized by CYP3A.

Administration of LY315920Na/S-5920 had an acceptable safety profile in patients with severe sepsis. There was no overall survival benefit associated with the use of LY315920Na/S-5920 in this study. However, prospectively planned secondary analyses suggested that treatment with LY315920Na/S-5920 was associated with an improvement in survival in patients treated within 18 hrs of the first sepsis-induced organ failure.

In this double-blind, single-dose phase I study, the safety and tolerance of cefepime were assessed in 24 healthy male subjects, with ceftazidime as the control drug. Four subjects in each of the six dose groups (62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 mg as a 30-min itravenous infusion) received each antibiotic, according to*a crossover design, with a 2-day washout period between treatments. Blood and urine samples were obtained to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefepime. Plasma and urine samples were assayed for intact cefepime. Samples containing ceftazidime were discarded. The adverse effects observed in the study were mild and infrequent, with prompt recovery from adverse experiences and abnormal laboratory values. The cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters for the therapeutically significant doses of 250 to 2,000 mg appeared to be proportional to dose and similar to literature values for ceftazidime. The elimination half-life of about 2 h was independent of the dose. Urinary recovery of intact cefepime was invariant with respect to dose; an overall mean value of 82% of dose was obtained for the four highest levels. Mean renal clearance was 105 mI/min and suggestive of glomerular filtration as the primary excretion mechanism. In normal humans, the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of cefepime are very similar to those of ceftazidime.Cefepime (BMY-28142; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.) is a "fourth-generation" cephalosporin antibiotic with significant potential advantages over other broad-spectrum cephalosporins and some nontraditional beta-lactam antibiotics (4, 9, 18). It differs from other aminothiazolyl methoxyimino cephalosporins by having a quaternized N-methyl pyrrolidine moiety attached to the methylene group at C-3 (Fig. 1). In addition to a very broad antimicrobial spectrum, cefepime appears to have low affinity for major chromosomally mediated ,3-lactamases and thus is less affected by the nonhydrolytic barrier mechanism of resistance in these bacteria (14). These in vitro advantages have been borne out in a number of in vivo infection models (9,17).Preclinical safety evaluation and pharmacokinetic studies of cefepime were done primarily with rats and monkeys. The findings of these studies suggest that when administered by intravenous infusion, cefepime is as safe as other commercially available cephalosporins. The pharmacokinetics in rats and monkeys have been extensively characterized (2, 7). The present phase I study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of cefepime in healthy male volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODSStudy design. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the safety and tolerance of cefepime after single intravenous doses of 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, and 2,000 mg to normal human volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime were also assessed at each dose level. The study was