No abstract

The miRNA pattern identified critical functions in cell proliferation and survival associated with DOR. GC in women with DOR seems to respond differently to the LH surge.

Purpose Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is often prescribed for poor responders in IVF in an effort to improve response to ovarian stimulation. The effect of DHEA supplementation and resultant supraphysiologic DHEA-S serum levels on sex steroid assays has not been evaluated in this population. This study seeks to determine the relationship between DHEA supplementation and progesterone measurements to characterize the degree of interference with particular immunoassays. Methods Characterization was accomplished in two phases. First, DHEA-S standard control reagents with no progesterone present were assayed for both DHEA-S and progesterone levels. Second, serum pools from 60 unique IVF patients' serum were used to create six pooled serum samples: three from patients on DHEA supplementation and three from patients not on DHEA supplementation. The three pools were composed of patients whose serum fell into low, medium, and high progesterone ranges. Baseline DHEA-S and progesterone were measured, and the mean level of DHEA-S in the mid-range progesterone pool was used as the mid-point for addition of DHEA-S standard to the serum pools from patients without DHEA supplementation. Progesterone from these pools was then measured on three commercially available immunoassay systems. Results The first experiment revealed a linear increase in progesterone when analyzing the DHEA-S standard ranging from 0.5 ng/mL in the blank control (no DHEA-S) to up to 2.0 ng/ mL in the high control (DHEA-S >700 μg/mL), indicating that the DHEA-S cross-reacts with the progesterone assays. In the second experiment, patients' serum DHEA-S and progesterone were measured from pooled serum samples of those taking DHEA and those not taking DHEA. Adding DHEA-S to the pooled serum of those not taking DHEA resulted in a linear increase in progesterone levels on two of three commercially available immunoassays (p < 0.05). Conclusions DHEA-S can interfere with standard progesterone immunoassays used in clinical ART programs, and thus serum progesterone levels in IVF patients on DHEA supplementation may not reflect truly bioactive progesterone.

PurposeTo compare ovulation rates between Letrozole and Clomiphene Citrate (CC) using a stair-step protocol to achieve ovulation induction in women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS).MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort of predominantly Hispanic PCOS women of reproductive age who completed ovulation induction (OI) comparing women who underwent Letrozole stair-step protocol to those who underwent OI with CC stair-step. All women had a diagnosis of PCOS based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria. For both protocols, sequentially higher doses of Letrozole or CC were given 7 days after the last dose if no dominant follicles were seen on ultrasonography. The primary outcome was ovulation rate (determined by presence of a dominant follicle) between the two treatment groups. Secondary outcomes included time to ovulation, clinical pregnancy rates and side effects.Results49 PCOS patients completed a Letrozole stair-step cycle and 43 completed a CC stair-step cycle for OI. Overall, demographics were comparable between both groups. Ovulation rates with the Letrozole stair-step protocol were equivalent to CC stair-step protocol (96% vs 88%, p = 0.17). Although the mean time (days) to ovulation was shorter in the Letrozole group (19.5 vs 23.1, p = 0.027), the pregnancy rates were similar for both groups.ConclusionsThis is the first study to date that has compared the efficacy of the stair-step protocol in PCOS patients using Letrozole and CC. Both Letrozole and CC can be prescribed in a stair-step fashion. Letrozole stair-step was as efficacious as CC stair-step; patients achieved comparable rates of ovulation and clinical pregnancy. Time to ovulation was shorter in the Letrozole protocol.

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and premature ovarian failure are associated with elevated FMR1 CGG repeat alleles. We assessed pretest attitudes about potentially carrying the FMR1 premutation (FXP) (>55 CGG repeats) among reproductive age women compared with attitudes after learning their non-carrier status. Ninety-two women with DOR, regular menses and no family history of Fragile X Syndrome underwent FMR1 testing and completed attitudinal questionnaires before (T1) and 3 months after learning the test results (T2). The analysis utilized signed rank tests and α=0.05. Very few women thought they were likely to have a FXP (6.6%). More participants thought FMR1 premutations were “serious” at T2 (62.9%) than at T1 (46.1%, p<0.0003). When asked at T1 to “describe your feelings when you consider that you are potentially a carrier” of a FXP, 10% had negative feelings, 50% felt ambivalent, and 40% had positive feelings. At T2, feelings about not being a carrier were significantly more favorable (p<0.0001): negative (0%), ambivalent (6.5%), positive (93%). Corroborating prior reports, few women had a negative view of FXP, perhaps anticipating that carrying the FXP explains their infertility. Perception of the seriousness of FXP increased after learning they did not carry the FXP, which would be predicted by health belief models.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective To compare effectiveness of spontaneous ovulation monitored by urinary luteinising hormone (LH) versus induced ovulation by administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) in couples undergoing gonadotrophin-stimulated intrauterine insemination (IUI).Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting University-level infertility unit.Population Couples with unexplained infertility, mild endometriosis, mild male factor infertility and polycystic ovarian syndrome.Methods Couples were randomised to an LH group (Group A), in which urinary LH was measured daily to detect spontaneous ovulation, or an hCG group (Group B), in which urinary hCG was administered as a trigger.Main outcome measures Clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomesongoing pregnancy, live birth, multiple pregnancy and miscarriage rates.Results A total of 392 couples were randomised with 196 in each arm. The clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised was 14/ 196 (7.1%) in the LH arm versus 15/196 (7.6%) in the hCG arm (P = 0.847, which was not statistically significant). Similarly, the ongoing pregnancy rates [13/196 (6.6%) versus 14/196 (7.1%); P = 0.84] and the live birth rates [13/196 (6.6%) versus 14/196 (7.1%); P = 0.84] between the two groups did not show any significant difference. The duration of stimulation and gonadotrophin dosage also did not differ significantly between the two methods.Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rates when urinary LH and hCG trigger were compared as methods to time insemination in women undergoing gonadotropin-stimulated IUI.Keywords Human chorionic gonadotrophin, intrauterine insemination, ovulation, urinary luteinising hormone.Tweetable abstract A randomised controlled study showing similar effectiveness between two different methods of timing IUI.Please cite this paper as: Thomas S, Sebastain T, Karthikeyan M, Mangalaraj AM, Aleyamma TK, Kamath MS. Effectiveness of spontaneous ovulation as monitored by urinary luteinising hormone versus induced ovulation by administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin in couples undergoing gonadotrophin-stimulated intrauterine insemination: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2019; 126 (S4): 58-65.