Hybridoma cell lines producing monoclonal antibodies against cowpox virus (CPV) and vaccinia virus (VV) were established to examine the specific and cross-reactive antigenic determinants of these viruses. Monoclonal antibodies against CPV (LB red strain) and VV (Lister strain and Ikeda strain) were classified into several groups on the basis of the results of immunofluorescence and haemagglutination inhibition tests. It was suggested that the groups defined above include the group of antibodies reacting with each of known major antigens of poxvirus, i.e. nucleoprotein (NP) antigen, heat labile and stable complex (LS) antigen, haemagglutinin (HA), cell surface antigen (CSA) and type A inclusion body (A).
The antigen in A type inclusion bodies (ATIB) induced by cowpox virus (CPV) was examined by immunofluorescent staining with monoclonal antibodies and polypeptide analysis. In the immunofluorescence (IF) test, these monoclonal antibodies reacted only with cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in cells infected with CPV. The fluorescence became detectable in the cells 6-9 hours after infection with CPV. No fluorescence was detectable in cells infected with CPV in the presence of cytosine-I-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-HCl (Ara C) or in cells infected with other poxviruses, such as vaccinia virus (VV) or Shope fibroma virus (SFV). On Western blotting and immunoprecipitation followed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), only one component with a molecular weight of about 160,000 (160 K) was detected in CPV-infected cells. This 160 K polypeptide was first detectable 12 hours after infection of cells with CPV, and was not detectable in infected cells in the presence of Ara C. The 160 K polypeptide was not detected in cells infected with VV or SFV, or in virions purified from CPV-, VV- or SFV-infected cells.
Several monoclonal antibodies recognizing distinct antigenic determinants in A-type inclusion bodies (ATIB) induced by cowpox virus (CPV) were obtained to examine the cross-reactivity among various strains of poxviridae, comprising CPV, ectromelia virus (EV), vaccinia virus (VV) and Shope fibroma virus (SFV). The monoclonal antibodies were classified into at least 3 groups on the basis of the results of an immunofluorescence test and immunoblotting; i. e., strain-specific, CPV and EV-specific and Orthopoxvirus (CPV, EV and VV)-specific antibodies. Differences were found between the antigenic determinants of ATIB of LB strains (LB red and LB white) and other strains (Amsterdam, 53, 58 and 60) of CPV and also between those of ATIB of CPV and EV. An interesting finding was that VV also produces the antigen analogous to that associated with ATIB in CPV- and EV-infected cells despite the absence of morphologically defined ATIB.
SUMMARYMonoclonal antibodies directed against major antigens induced by cowpox virus (CPV) were produced. The specificities of these antibodies were established by immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting and several serological analyses, and from the cross-reactivities of these antibodies with cells infected with various other poxviruses, ectromelia virus (EV), vaccinia virus and Shope fibroma virus. The antibodies defined included ones reacting with each of the known major antigens of poxviruses, i.e. the common antigen of all poxviruses (probably NP antigen), the Orthopoxvirus-specific antigen (probably LS antigen), the haemagglutinin, the cell surface antigen, the common A-type inclusions in CPV and EV, and the antigen involved in neutralization.
In this study, we investigated what exposure period to common pollutants and meteorological parameters has the strongest association with eczema severity or probability of admission to hospital with eczema. Using two datasets from an urban population: local eczema patient emergency department (ED) visits (n¼ 1057) and data from a phenotyping study in an immigrant population (n¼363), we looked at the relationship of admission rates, eczema severity and local pollution/weather station data e 10 mm particulate matter (PM10) 2.5 mm
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.