Corepressors and coactivators can modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) complexed with agonist and antagonist steroids, respectively, in intact cells. We recently reported that GR-antagonist complexes bind to the coactivator TIF2, (transcriptional intermediary factor 2), which is consistent with the whole-cell effects of coactivators being mediated by direct interactions with GR complexes. We now ask whether the whole-cell modulatory activity of corepressors also entails binding to both GR-agonist and -antagonist complexes and whether the association of corepressors and coactivators with GR complexes involves competitive equilibrium reactions. In mammalian two-hybrid assays with two different cell lines and in cell-free pull-down and whole-cell immunoprecipitation assays, the corepressors NCoR (nuclear receptor corepressor) and SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor) associate with agonist and antagonist complexes of GRs. Both N- and C-terminal regions of GR are needed for corepressor binding, which requires the CoRNR box motifs that mediate corepressor binding to other nuclear/steroid receptors. Importantly, whole-cell GR interactions with corepressors are competitively inhibited by excess coactivator and vice versa. However, the regions of the coactivator TIF2 that compete for GR binding to corepressor and coactivator are not the same, implying a molecular difference in GR association with coactivators and corepressors. Finally, when the whole-cell ratio of coactivators to corepressors is altered by selective cofactor binding to exogenous thyroid receptor beta +/- thyroid hormone, the GR dose-response-curve and partial agonist activity are appropriately modified. Such modifications are independent of histone acetylation. We conclude that mutually antagonistic equilibrium interactions of corepressors and coactivators modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes in a manner that is responsive to the intracellular ratio of these two classes of cofactors. This modulation provides an attractive mechanism for differential control of gene expression during development, differentiation, homeostasis, and endocrine therapies.

A common feature of nuclear receptor ligand binding domains (LBD) is a helical sandwich fold that nests a ligand binding pocket within the bottom half of the domain. Here we report that the ligand pocket of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) can be continuously extended into the top half of the LBD by binding to deacylcortivazol (DAC), an extremely potent glucocorticoid. It has been puzzling for decades why DAC, which contains a phenylpyrazole replacement at the conserved 3-ketone of steroid hormones that are normally required for activation of their cognate receptors, is a potent GR activator. The crystal structure of the GR LBD bound to DAC and the fourth LXXLL motif of steroid receptor coactivator 1 reveals that the GR ligand binding pocket is expanded to a size of 1,070 Å 3 , effectively doubling the size of the GR dexamethasone-binding pocket of 540 Å 3 and yet leaving the structure of the coactivator binding site intact. DAC occupies only ϳ50% of the space of the pocket but makes intricate interactions with the receptor around the phenylpyrazole group that accounts for the high-affinity binding of DAC. The dramatic expansion of the DAC-binding pocket thus highlights the conformational adaptability of GR to ligand binding. The new structure also allows docking of various nonsteroidal ligands that cannot be fitted into the previous structures, thus providing a new rational template for drug discovery of steroidal and nonsteroidal glucocorticoids that can be specifically designed to reach the unoccupied space of the expanded pocket.Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a steroid hormone-regulated transcription factor that belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily (1, 39). Upon ligand binding, GR regulates expression of an array of genes involved in glucose and lipid metabolism, bone turnover, lung maturation, and homeostasis of the immune, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems. GR ligands, including dexamethasone (DEX), fluticasone propionate, and other steroid analogs, are among the most effective agents for treating asthma, arthritis, leukemia, and various autoimmune diseases because of their potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. However, therapeutic use of glucocorticoids also induces a number of side effects including diabetes, bone loss, hypertension, and obesity (24). Although the molecular basis for these undesired side effects remains to be fully characterized (26), development of a GR ligand that can dissociate the therapeutic effects from the undesired adverse effects has been the subject of intense pharmaceutical research (23,25).The transcriptional function of GR is primarily controlled by ligand binding to its C-terminal ligand binding domain (LBD). In the absence of ligand, GR is retained in the cytoplasm by an association between the receptor LBD and the HSP90 chaperone complex (22). Ligand binding induces conformational changes in the LBD that lead to translocation of the receptor into the nucleus, where GR binds to DNA and regulates transcription of nearby genes. In addition to ...

No abstract

Ligand-mediated gene induction by steroid receptors is a multistep process characterized by a dose-response curve for gene product that follows a first-order Hill equation. This behavior has classically been explained by steroid binding to receptor being the rate-limiting step. However, this predicts a constant potency of gene induction (EC 50 ) for a given receptor-steroid complex, which is challenged by the findings that various cofactors/reagents can alter this parameter in a gene-specific manner. These properties put strong constraints on the mechanisms of gene induction and raise two questions: How can a first-order Hill dose-response curve (FHDC) arise from a multistep reaction sequence, and how do cofactors modify potency? Here we introduce a theoretical framework in which a sequence of steps yields an FHDC for the final product as a function of the initial agonist concentration. An exact determination of all constants is not required to describe the final FHDC. The theory predicts mechanisms for cofactor/reagent effects on gene-induction potency and maximal activity and it assigns a relative order to cofactors in the sequence of steps. The theory is supported by several observations from glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene induction. It identifies the mechanism and matches the measured dose-response curves for different concentrations of the combination of cofactor Ubc9 and receptor. It also predicts that an FHDC cannot involve the DNA binding of preformed receptor dimers, which is validated experimentally. The theory is general and can be applied to any biochemical reaction that shows an FHDC.dose-response | Michaelis-Menten | gene expression | steroid receptors | glucocorticoids | pharmacology I n ligand-mediated gene induction, the amount of gene expressed depends on the amount of ligand present. Thus, the specific shape and properties of the dose-response curve of gene induction, which is of crucial importance for development, differentiation, and homeostasis in many biological systems, provide a quantitative means for probing the gene-induction process. In many cases, the dose-response curve in gene induction obeys a sigmoidal curve, but not all sigmoidal curves have the same shape. For example, a dose-response curve obeying a first-order Hill equation or function (Hill coefficient equal to 1) goes from 10 to 90% of maximum activity over an 81-fold change in ligand concentration, whereas only a 9-fold change is required in a secondorder Hill function, which thus has a different shape (Fig. S1). (A first-order Hill function is sometimes called a Michaelis-Menten function.) Depending upon the shape of the dose-response curve, the responsiveness of gene induction to the same variation in ligand concentration will differ greatly. In addition to the shape, the position or potency [i.e., concentration required for 50% of maximal response (EC 50 )] and maximum activity (A max ) of the dose-response curve are required to specify the amount of gene expressed for a given amount of ligand. Despite the vital...

A distinguishing, but unexplained, characteristic of steroid hormone action is the dose-response curve for the regulation of gene expression. We have previously reported that the dose-response curve for glucocorticoid induction of a transfected reporter gene in CV-1 and HeLa cells is repositioned in the presence of increasing concentrations of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). This behavior is now shown to be independent of the reporter, promoter, or enhancer, consistent with our proposal that a transacting factor(s) was being titrated by added receptors. Candidate factors have been identified by the observation that changes in glucocorticoid induction parameters in CV-1 cells could be reproduced by varying the cellular levels of coactivators [transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2), steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1), and amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1)], comodulator [CREB-binding protein (CBP)], or corepressor [silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid-hormone receptors (SMRT)] without concomitant increases in GR. Significantly, the effects of TIF2 and SMRT were mutually antagonistic. Similarly, additional SMRT could reverse the action of increased levels of GRs in HeLa cells, thus indicating that the effects of cofactors on transcription may be general for GR in a variety of cells. These data further indicate that GRs are yet an additional target of the corepressor SMRT. At the same time, these cofactors were found to be capable of regulating the level of residual agonist activity displayed by antiglucocorticoids. Finally, these observations suggest that a novel role for cofactors is to participate in processes that determine the dose-response curve, and partial agonist activity, of GR-steroid complexes. This new activity of cofactors is disconnected from their ability to increase or decrease GR transactivation. An equilibrium model is proposed in which the ratio of coactivator-corepressor bound to either receptor-agonist or -antagonist complexes regulates the final transcriptional properties.

Cofactors are intimately involved in steroid-regulated gene expression. Two critical questions are (1) the steps at which cofactors exert their biological activities and (2) the nature of that activity. Here we show that a new mathematical theory of steroid hormone action can be used to deduce the kinetic properties and reaction sequence position for the functioning of any two cofactors relative to a concentration limiting step (CLS) and to each other. The predictions of the theory, which can be applied using graphical methods similar to those of enzyme kinetics, are validated by obtaining internally consistent data for pair-wise analyses of three cofactors (TIF2, sSMRT, and NCoR) in U2OS cells. The analysis of TIF2 and sSMRT actions on GR-induction of an endogenous gene gave results identical to those with an exogenous reporter. Thus new tools to determine previously unobtainable information about the nature and position of cofactor action in any process displaying first-order Hill plot kinetics are now available.

The EC 50 of agonists and the partial agonist activity of antagonists are crucial parameters for steroid hormone control of gene expression and endocrine therapies. These parameters have been shown to be modulated by a naturally occurring cis-acting element, called the glucocorticoid modulatory element (GME) that binds two proteins, GMEB-1 and -2. We now present evidence that the GMEBs contact Ubc9, which is the mammalian homolog of a yeast E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Ubc9 also binds to glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). Ubc9 displays no intrinsic transactivation activity but modifies both the absolute amount of induced gene product and the fold induction by GR. With high concentrations of GR, added Ubc9 also reduces the EC 50 of agonists and increases the partial agonist activity of antagonists in a manner that is independent of the ability of Ubc9 to transfer SUMO-1 (small ubiquitin-like modifier-1) to proteins. This new activity of Ubc9 requires only the ligand binding domain of GR and part of the hinge region. Interestingly, Ubc9 modulation of full-length GR transcriptional properties can be seen in the absence of a GME. This, though, is consistent with the GME acting by increasing the local concentration of Ubc9, which then activates a previously unobserved target in the transcriptional machinery. With high concentrations of Ubc9 and GR, Ubc9 binding to GR appears to be sufficient to permit Ubc9 to act independently of the GME.

Transient transfections of steroid receptors have yielded much of the data used to construct the current models of steroid hormone action. These experiments invariably examine the ability of receptors to regulate transcription when occupied by saturating concentrations of steroid. We now report that other induction properties of a transiently transfected gene are not constant but vary with the concentration of transiently transfected glucocorticoid receptors. Thus, the percentage of maximal induction seen with subsaturating concentrations of glucocorticoid could be dramatically increased, and an antiglucocorticoid could be converted into a partial glucocorticoid, simply by increasing the concentration of glucocorticoid receptors. This behavior was observed in HeLa cells, containing endogenous receptors, or in CV-1 cells, containing almost no endogenous receptor, with either homologous or heterologous receptors. These increases were relatively insensitive to the concentration of reporter gene, suggesting the titration of some transcription factor(s) involved in regulating the position of the glucocorticoid dose-response curve and the agonist activity of an antiglucocorticoid. This property of transfected glucocorticoid receptors required a full-length, functionally active receptor but was retained, albeit reduced in magnitude, in the absence of binding to a glucocorticoid response element. Furthermore, this phenomenon was specific in that the A form of the human progesterone receptor had no effect under the same conditions. These variations in induction properties of antiglucocorticoids and of subsaturating concentrations of glucocorticoid, in a manner that was proportional to the amount of transfected receptor, reveal processes that are not operative with saturating concentrations of glucocorticoid. These variations also demonstrate that caution should be exercised in making mechanistic conclusions based solely on experiments conducted with saturating concentrations of glucocorticoid.The overriding experimental advantage of transient transfections is time. Thus, the biological consequences of altered nucleotide compositions in the cDNAs encoding active proteins, and in genomic sequences, can be examined in a fraction of the time required to establish cell lines with the same sequences stably integrated into the cellular genome. In the field of steroid receptors, most of the recent advances have emerged from transient transfection experiments, including the contributions of cis-acting elements (1, 2), of different nucleotides in receptor binding to the hormone-responsive element (3), of various regions of receptors in steroid binding and biological activity (reviewed in Ref. 4), of promoter structure and cell type as determinants for the activity of antisteroid activity (5), and of overlapping signaling systems such as dopamine (6), epidermal growth factor (7), and protein kinase A inducers (8, 9). The utility of transient transfections has been further enhanced by the development of the "two-hybrid" (10, 11) and...