Ligand-mediated gene induction by steroid receptors is a multistep process characterized by a dose-response curve for gene product that follows a first-order Hill equation. This behavior has classically been explained by steroid binding to receptor being the rate-limiting step. However, this predicts a constant potency of gene induction (EC 50 ) for a given receptor-steroid complex, which is challenged by the findings that various cofactors/reagents can alter this parameter in a gene-specific manner. These properties put strong constraints on the mechanisms of gene induction and raise two questions: How can a first-order Hill dose-response curve (FHDC) arise from a multistep reaction sequence, and how do cofactors modify potency? Here we introduce a theoretical framework in which a sequence of steps yields an FHDC for the final product as a function of the initial agonist concentration. An exact determination of all constants is not required to describe the final FHDC. The theory predicts mechanisms for cofactor/reagent effects on gene-induction potency and maximal activity and it assigns a relative order to cofactors in the sequence of steps. The theory is supported by several observations from glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene induction. It identifies the mechanism and matches the measured dose-response curves for different concentrations of the combination of cofactor Ubc9 and receptor. It also predicts that an FHDC cannot involve the DNA binding of preformed receptor dimers, which is validated experimentally. The theory is general and can be applied to any biochemical reaction that shows an FHDC.dose-response | Michaelis-Menten | gene expression | steroid receptors | glucocorticoids | pharmacology I n ligand-mediated gene induction, the amount of gene expressed depends on the amount of ligand present. Thus, the specific shape and properties of the dose-response curve of gene induction, which is of crucial importance for development, differentiation, and homeostasis in many biological systems, provide a quantitative means for probing the gene-induction process. In many cases, the dose-response curve in gene induction obeys a sigmoidal curve, but not all sigmoidal curves have the same shape. For example, a dose-response curve obeying a first-order Hill equation or function (Hill coefficient equal to 1) goes from 10 to 90% of maximum activity over an 81-fold change in ligand concentration, whereas only a 9-fold change is required in a secondorder Hill function, which thus has a different shape (Fig. S1). (A first-order Hill function is sometimes called a Michaelis-Menten function.) Depending upon the shape of the dose-response curve, the responsiveness of gene induction to the same variation in ligand concentration will differ greatly. In addition to the shape, the position or potency [i.e., concentration required for 50% of maximal response (EC 50 )] and maximum activity (A max ) of the dose-response curve are required to specify the amount of gene expressed for a given amount of ligand. Despite the vital...

Fibroblast growth factor-binding protein (FGF-BP) is a secreted protein that binds and activates fibroblast growth factors (FGF-1 and FGF-2) and induces angiogenesis in some human cancers. FGF-BP is expressed at high levels in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines and tumor samples and has been shown to be rate-limiting for the growth of SCC tumors in vivo. In this study, we examine the regulation of FGF-BP by epidermal growth factor (EGF) and the signal transduction mechanisms that mediate this effect. We found that EGF treatment of the ME-180 SCC cell line caused a rapid induction of FGF-BP gene expression. This induction was mediated transcriptionally through the AP-1 (c-Fos/JunD) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein elements as well as through an E-box repressor site in the proximal regulatory region of the FGF-BP promoter. Pharmacological inhibition of protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) completely blocked EGF induction of FGF-BP mRNA, whereas inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase had no effect. Additionally, both EGF- and anisomycin-induced FGF-BP mRNA was abrogated by inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, demonstrating a role for p38 in the regulation of FGF-BP. Co-transfection of the FGF-BP promoter with dominant negative forms of MEK2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2, and p38 significantly decreased the level of EGF induction, whereas expression of a dominant negative c-Jun N-terminal kinase mutant or expression of c-Jun N-terminal kinase inhibitory protein had no effect. Similarly, activation of the p38 pathway by overexpression of wild-type p38 or MKK6 enhanced FGF-BP transcription. These results demonstrate that EGF induction of FGF-BP occurs selectively through dual activation of the stress-activated p38 and the MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, which ultimately leads to activation of the promoter through AP-1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein sites.

AIB1 (amplified in breast cancer 1), also called SRC-3 and NCoA-3, is a member of the p160 nuclear receptor co-activator family and is considered an important oncogene in breast cancer. Increased AIB1 levels in human breast cancer have been correlated with poor clinical prognosis. Overexpression of AIB1 in conjunction with members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF/HER) tyrosine kinase family, such as HER2, is associated with resistance to tamoxifen therapy and decreased disease-free survival. A number of functional studies in cell culture and in rodents indicate that AIB1 has a pleiotropic role in breast cancer. Initially AIB1 was shown to have a role in the estrogen-dependent proliferation of breast epithelial cells. However, AIB1 also affects the growth of hormone-independent breast cancer and AIB1 levels are limiting for IGF-1-, EGF- and heregulin-stimulated biological responses in breast cancer cells and consequently the PI3 K/Akt/mTOR and other EGFR/HER2 signaling pathways are controlled by changes in AIB1 protein levels. The cellular levels and activity of AIB1 are in turn regulated at the levels of transcription, mRNA stability, post-translational modification, and by a complex control of protein half life. In particular, AIB1 activity as well as its half-life is modulated through a number of post-translational modifications including serine, threonine and tyrosine phosphorylation via kinases that are components of multiple signal transduction pathways. This review summarizes the possible mechanisms of how dysregulation of AIB1 at multiple levels can lead to the initiation and progression of breast cancer as well as its role as a predictor of response to breast cancer therapy, and as a possible therapeutic target.

Overexpression and activation of the steroid receptor coactivator amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1)/steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC-3) have been shown to have a critical role in oncogenesis and are required for both steroid and growth factor signaling in epithelial tumors. Here, we report a new mechanism for activation of SRC coactivators. We demonstrate regulated tyrosine phosphorylation of AIB1/SRC-3 at a C-terminal tyrosine residue (Y1357) that is phosphorylated after insulin-like growth factor 1, epidermal growth factor, or estrogen treatment of breast cancer cells. Phosphorylated Y1357 is increased in HER2/neu (v-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2) mammary tumor epithelia and is required to modulate AIB1/SRC-3 coactivation of estrogen receptor alpha (ER␣), progesterone receptor B, NF-B, and AP-1-dependent promoters. c-Abl (v-Abl Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1) tyrosine kinase directly phosphorylates AIB1/SRC-3 at Y1357 and modulates the association of AIB1 with c-Abl, ER␣, the transcriptional cofactor p300, and the methyltransferase coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1, CARM1. AIB1/SRC-3-dependent transcription and phenotypic changes, such as cell growth and focus formation, can be reversed by an Abl kinase inhibitor, imatinib. Thus, the phosphorylation state of Y1357 can function as a molecular on/off switch and facilitates the cross talk between hormone, growth factor, and intracellular kinase signaling pathways in cancer.Coactivators significantly enhance the rate of transcription by binding to, and bringing together, components of the basal transcriptional machinery complex at gene promoters. A member of the p160 steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) gene family amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) (also called steroid receptor coactivator-3 [SRC-3], TRAM1, RAC3, ACTR, and NCOA3) is amplified, and its corresponding mRNA and protein levels are overexpressed in multiple cancers (3,20,29,43,58). Overexpression of AIB1/SRC-3 is associated with markers of poor prognosis in breast cancer cells, including exhibiting increased p53 expression, being HER2 positive, and lacking estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression (5, 38). Phenotypic studies strongly argue that AIB1/ SRC-3 has a role in both hormone-and growth factor-dependent gene expression. Cancer cell line studies demonstrate that AIB1 is critical for growth dependent on estrogen (28) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1); it protects cells against apoptosis or anoikis (a form of apoptosis that is induced by anchorage-dependent cells detaching from the surrounding extracellular matrix) (37) and increases cell size and proliferation (64). AIB1 also regulates epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and the subsequent downstream EGF-induced activation of STAT5 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (25). Targeted disruption of p/CIP (CREB-binding protein [CBP]-interacting protein), the mouse homologue of AIB1, demonstrates that AIB1 is critical for somatic growth (...

Several factors modulate the position of the dose-response curve of steroid receptor-agonist complexes and the partial agonist activity of antagonist complexes, thereby causing differential gene activation by circulating hormones and unequal gene repression during endocrine therapies with antisteroids. We now ask whether the modulatory activity of three factors (homologous receptor, coactivator transcription intermediary factor 2, and Ubc9) requires the same or different domains of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). In all cases, we find that neither the amino terminal half of the receptor, which contains the activation function-1 activation domain, nor the DNA binding domain is required. This contrasts with the major role of activation function-1 in determining the amount of gene expression and partial agonist activity of antisteroids with most steroid receptors. However, the situation is more complicated with Ubc9, where GR N-terminal sequences prevent the actions of Ubc9, but not added GR or transcription intermediary factor 2, at low GR concentrations. Inhibition is relieved by deletion of these sequences or by replacement with the comparable region of progesterone receptors but not by overexpression of the repressive sequences. These results plus the binding of C-terminal GR sequences to the suppressive N-terminal domain implicate an intramolecular mechanism for the inhibition of Ubc9 actions at low GR concentrations. A shift from noncooperative to cooperative steroid binding at high GR concentrations suggests that conformational changes reposition the inhibitory N-terminal sequence to allow Ubc9 interaction with elements of the ligand binding domain. Collectively, these results indicate a dominant role of GR C-terminal sequences in the modulation of the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes. They also reveal mechanistic differences both among individual modulators and between the ability of the same factors to regulate the total amount of gene expression.

BackgroundEstrogen is a known growth promoter for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells. Paradoxically, in breast cancer cells that have been chronically deprived of estrogen stimulation, re-introduction of the hormone can induce apoptosis.Methodology/Principal FindingsHere, we sought to identify signaling networks that are triggered by estradiol (E2) in isogenic MCF-7 breast cancer cells that undergo apoptosis (MCF-7:5C) versus cells that proliferate upon exposure to E2 (MCF-7). The nuclear receptor co-activator AIB1 (Amplified in Breast Cancer-1) is known to be rate-limiting for E2-induced cell survival responses in MCF-7 cells and was found here to also be required for the induction of apoptosis by E2 in the MCF-7:5C cells. Proteins that interact with AIB1 as well as complexes that contain tyrosine phosphorylated proteins were isolated by immunoprecipitation and identified by mass spectrometry (MS) at baseline and after a brief exposure to E2 for two hours. Bioinformatic network analyses of the identified protein interactions were then used to analyze E2 signaling pathways that trigger apoptosis versus survival. Comparison of MS data with a computationally-predicted AIB1 interaction network showed that 26 proteins identified in this study are within this network, and are involved in signal transduction, transcription, cell cycle regulation and protein degradation.ConclusionsG-protein-coupled receptors, PI3 kinase, Wnt and Notch signaling pathways were most strongly associated with E2-induced proliferation or apoptosis and are integrated here into a global AIB1 signaling network that controls qualitatively distinct responses to estrogen.

Glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) affect both gene induction and gene repression. The disparities of receptor binding to DNA and increased vs. decreased gene expression have suggested significant mechanistic differences between GR-mediated induction and repression. Numerous transcription factors are known to modulate three parameters of gene induction: the total activity (Vmax) and position of the dose-response curve with glucocorticoids (EC50) and the percent partial agonist activity with antiglucocorticoids. We have examined the effects on GR-mediated repression of five modulators (coactivators TIF2 [GRIP1, SRC-2] and SRC-1, corepressor SMRT, and comodulators STAMP and Ubc9), a glucocorticoid steroid (deacylcortivazol [DAC]) of very different structure, and an inhibitor of histone deacetylation (trichostatin A [TSA]). These factors interact with different domains of GR and thus are sensitive topological probes of GR action. These agents altered the Vmax, EC50, and percent partial agonist activity of endogenous and exogenous repressed genes similarly to that previously observed for GR-regulated gene induction. Collectively, these results suggest that GR-mediated induction and repression share many of the same molecular interactions and that the causes for different levels of gene transcription arise from more distal downstream steps.

The ®broblast growth factor-binding protein (FGF-BP) modulates FGF activity through binding and release from the extracellular matrix. Consequently, the expression of FGF-BP in certain tumor types is a rate-limiting regulator of FGF-mediated angiogenesis. FGF-BP is upregulated in squamous cell carcinoma by treatment with mitogens such as EGF or TPA. In this study, we investigated the regulation of FGF-BP gene expression by serum. Treatment of serum-starved ME-180 cells with fetal bovine serum (FBS) resulted in a rapid increase in steady-state levels of FGF-BP mRNA and in the rate of FGF-BP gene transcription. Serum induction of FGF-BP mRNA was not mediated through EGF receptor activation but was dependent on PKC, as well as ERK kinase (MEK) and p38 MAP kinase activation. Promoter analysis showed that C/EBP is the main promoter element required for the serum response. Unlike EGF-activation of FGF-BP, transcriptional induction by serum is not signi®cantly regulated through the AP-1 or E-box sites in the promoter. These results illustrate di erences between the mechanism of induction in response to serum and EGF. Oncogene (2001) 20, 1730 ± 1738.