TomoTherapy provided better locoregional control and cancer-specific survival than RapidArc treatment, with fewer salivary disorders. No significant difference was shown in progression-free and overall survival. These results should be explored in a randomized trial.

BackgroundGranular cell or Abrikossoff’s tumors are usually benign however rare malignant forms concern 1 to 3% of cases reported. Pelvic locations are exceptional.Case presentationWe report a case of a 43-years-old patient who had a benign Abrikossoff’s tumor localized in the right femoral triangle diagnosed at the biopsy. The patient underwent a surgical tumorectomy and inguinal lymph nodes resection. Histologically, the tumor showed enough criteria to give diagnosis of malignancy: nuclear pleomorphism, tumor cell spindling, vesicular nuclei with large nucleoli. Moreover, five lymph nodes were metastatic. Immunohistochemistry findings confirmed the diagnosis of granular cell tumor which is positive for S100 protein and CD68 antibodies. The mitotic index was nevertheless low with a Ki67 labeling index of 1–2%. A large surgical revision with an inguinal curage following radiotherapy were decided on oncology committee. Adjuvant radiotherapy on the tumor bed and right inguinal area of ​​50 Gy in conventional fractionation was delivered with the aim of reducing local recurrence risk. There was no recurrence on longer follow-up (10 months post radiotherapy).ConclusionsAdjuvant radiotherapy seems an appropriate therapeutic approach, even if controversial, given that some authors report effectiveness on local disease progression.

No abstract

No abstract

5001 Background: RT is the standard salvage treatment after RP. The role of HT is not formally demonstrated to date. This trial assessed the efficacy of RT alone vs RT+HT in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), metastase-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with biological relapse (BR) after RP. After a median follow-up (FU) duration of 5.3 years, we previously reported [Carrie C, Lancet Oncol 2016] a benefit in PFS (80% vs 62% PFS free at 5 years; p < 0.0001) in the combined arm, whatever the risk subgroups. Methods: Patients (pts) were randomized (1:1) to RT alone or RT+HT (goserelin, for 6 months). The randomization was stratified according to radiotherapy modality and risk group. Low risk was defined as Gleason score < 8, surgical margins+, psa doubling time > 8 months and no seminal vesicle involment. Assuming a 45% 5-year PFS of 45% in the RT arm, the trial required 369 pts per arm to detect an improvement of 12% on PFS in RT+HT arm (90% power and 5% bilateral alpha risk), possibly translating into a 10% gain in OS (75% to 85% with 80% power). Biological relapse (BR) was defined according to ASTRO-consensus. Results: At the time of data cutoff (March 2019), the median duration follow-up was 112 months. We confirm the benefit of RT+HT on PFS (HR = 0.54 [CI95% = 0.43-0.68] ; p < 0.0001) whatever the risk subgroup (HR = 0.47 [CI95% = 0.28-0.80] and 0.56 [CI95% = 0.44-0.73] for low and high risk patients, respectively. Metastatic free survival (MFS) is significantly improved in the combined arm (HR = 0.73 [CI95% = 0.54-0.98] ; p = 0.034) with 69% [CI95% = 63-74] versus 75% [CI95% = 70-80] of MFS at 10 years for RT alone and RT+HT, respectively. Conclusions: Salvage radiotherapy combined with short term HT significantly improved 10-years metastatic free survival compared with salvage radiotherapy alone. GETUG-16 considered in the context of previously published results from RTOG-9601, confirm that this strategy can be considered as the new standard for salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy. Clinical trial information: NCT00423475.

A dosimetric comparison was made of Helical Tomotherapy (HT) and Rapid'Arc(®) (RA) in 115 patients with head and neck carcinoma included in a prospective and multicentric study. HT and RA provided highly conformal plans that easily complied with dose volume constraints for organs at risk. HT reduced high doses to the planning target volumes (PTVs) compared to RA and provided a more homogeneous dose distribution but with an increased Non Tumoral Integral Dose (NTID) than RA. However, the clinical consequences of these dosimetric advantages and disadvantages need further investigation.

Background Moderately hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy (HFRT) has proven to be as safe and efficient as normofractionated radiotherapy (NFRT) in randomized trials resulting in major changes in clinical practice. Toxicity rates observed in selected clinical trial patients may differ from those observed in unselected patients with possible comorbidities and frailty in real-life. This study aimed to examine the influence of HFRT versus NFRT on acute toxicity and identify risks factors of dermatitis in real-life patients. Materials and methods Prospective data from breast cancer patients, treated with locoregional radiotherapy were collected between November 2015 and February 2020 in 3 comprehensive cancer centers. Through a systematic data-farming strategy, acute toxicity evaluation forms (CTCAEv4.0) were prospectively completed and extracted electronically. The results from each center were then anonymously merged into a single database for analysis. A Chi-2 test was used to compare HFRT and NFRT. Furthermore, risk factors of dermatitis were identified in a sub-study (622 patients) by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results In total, 3518 T0-4 N0-3 mostly M0 (85.8%) breast cancer patients with a median age of 60.7 (24–96 years old) were analyzed. Acute grade 2–3 dermatitis, grade 1–3 breast oedema, and grade 1–2 hyperpigmentation were less frequent with HFRT versus NFRT: respectively 8.9% versus 35.1% (Chi-2 = 373.7; p < 0.001), 29.0% versus 37.0% (Chi-2 = 23.1; p < 0.001) and 27.0% versus 55.8% (Chi-2 = 279.2; p < 0.001). Fewer patients experienced pain with HFRT versus NFRT: 33.4% versus 53.7% respectively (Chi-2 = 137.1; p < 0.001). Factors such as high BMI (OR = 2.30 [95% CI, 1.28–4.26], p < 0.01), large breast size (OR = 1.88 [95% CI, 1.07–3.28], p < 0.01) and lumpectomy over mastectomy (OR = 0.52 [95% CI, 0.27–0.97], p < 0.05) were associated with greater risk factors of grade 2–3 dermatitis in multivariate analysis regardless of NFRT or HFRT. Conclusion The results of this study suggests that breast HFRT may be a better option even for patients with a high BMI or large breast size. Acute toxicity was low to mild, and lower with HFRT compared to NFRT. Results from real-life data were robust, and support the use of HFRT beyond randomized study populations. Long-term real-life data awaits further investigation.

No abstract