Detailed photophysical investigations have been carried out using a probe dye, coumarin-153 (C153), to understand the microenvironments of micelles formed by the newly introduced Tetronic star block copolymers, T1304 and T1307, having the same poly(propylene oxide) (PPO) block size but different poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) block sizes. Ground state absorption, steady-state fluorescence, and time-resolved fluorescence measurements have been used to estimate the micropolarity, microviscosity, and solvation dynamics within the two micelles. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on these important physicochemical parameters for this new class of the star block copolymer micelles. Our results indicate that T1307 micelle offers a relatively more polar and less viscous microenvironment in the corona region, compared to T1304. The effect of the two micellar systems has subsequently been investigated on the bimolecular photoinduced electron transfer (ET) reactions between coumarin dyes (electron acceptors) and aromatic amines (electron donors). On correlating the energetics and kinetics of the ET reactions, clear Marcus inversion (MI) behavior is observed in both of the micellar media. Interestingly, the ET rates for all of the donor-acceptor pairs are much higher in T1307 than in T1304, and the onset of MI also appears at a relatively higher exergenocity (-Δ G) in the former micelle (∼0.45 eV for T1307) than the latter (∼0.37 eV for T1304). The effect of added NaCl salt studied selectively in T1307 micelle shows that the ET rate decreases significantly along with a shift in the onset of MI toward lower exergenocity region, so that in the presence of 2 M NaCl the system becomes quite comparable to T1304. On the basis of the observed results, it is realized that the micropolarity and hence the dynamics of the ET process can be tuned very effectively either by changing the constitution of the star block copolymer or by using a suitable additive as a modifier of the micellar microenvironment.
Abstract— The role of the replicative state of DNA and of the photosynthetic electron transport system in determining UV‐sensitivity of A. nidulans under conditions of non‐photoreactivation (by incubating the cells for 24 h in the dark following UV‐irradiation) has been investigated. Both the DNA synthesis data and the data on survival levels during cell cycle synchrony forced by light to dark and dark to light transitions showed that the differential UV‐sensitivity was not correlated with the replicative state of the DNA as suggested earlier. However, incubation in the light with the herbicides 2/3‐4, dichlorophenyl/‐l, 1‐dimethyl urea (DCMU) and 2‐chloro‐4‐ethylamino‐6‐isopropylamino‐s‐triazine (atrazine) which are known to inhibit electron transport by specifically binding to the high turnover B protein of photosynthetic electron transport system II (PSII), enhanced the UV‐resistance with kinetics similar to those of a culture transferred from light to dark. We interpret this result as implicative of PSII as the second lethal target in the case of cyanobacteria. The inactivation of electron transport activity of PSII as measured by the fall in DCMU‐sensitive fluorescence yield during post‐UV dark incubation supports this hypothesis. It is proposed that in wild type cells the survival under conditions of non‐photoreactivation following UV‐irradiation is essentially determined by the level of dark‐repair of damage to PSII and that the 32 kD B protein may have a role in dark‐repair of damage to the electron transport system. This hypothesis explains the paradox of negative liquid holding recovery phenomenon under conditions which promote excision‐repair of damaged DNA in cyanobacteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.