The recent improvements in the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment (GRACE) tracking data processing at GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam (GFZ) and Groupe de Recherche de Géodésie Spatiale (GRGS) Toulouse, the availability of newer surface gravity data sets in the Arctic, Antarctica and NorthAmerica, and the availability of a new mean sea surface height model from altimetry processing at GFZ gave rise to the generation of two new global gravity field models. The first, EIGEN-GL04S1, a satellite-only model complete to degree and order 150 in terms of spherical harmonics, was derived by combination of the latest GFZ Potsdam GRACE-only (EIGEN-GRACE04S) and GRGS Toulouse GRACE/LAGEOS (EIGEN-GL04S) mean field solutions. The second, EIGEN-GL04S1 was combined with surface gravity data from altimetry over the oceans and gravimetry over the continents to derive a new high-resolution global gravity field model called EIGEN-GL04C. This model is complete to degree and order 360 and thus resolves geoid and gravity anomalies at half-wavelengths of 55 km at the equator. A degree-dependent combination method has been applied in order to preserve the high accuracy from the GRACE satellite data in the lower frequency band of the geopotential and to form a smooth transition to the high-frequency information coming from the surface data. Compared to pre-CHAMP global high-resolution models, the accuracy was improved at a spatial resolution of 200 km (half-wavelength) by one order of magnitude to 3 cm in terms of geoid heights. The accuracy of this model (i.e. the commission error) at its full spatial resolution is estimated to be 15 cm. The model shows a reduced artificial meridional striping and an increased correlation of EIGEN-GL04C-derived geostrophic meridional currents with World Ocean Atlas 2001 (WOA01) data. These improvements have led to select EIGEN-GL04C for JASON-1 satellite altimeter data reprocessing.

No abstract

No abstract

Using three months of GPS satellite‐to‐satellite tracking and accelerometer data of the CHAMP satellite mission, a new long‐wavelength global gravity field model, called EIGEN‐1S, has been prepared in a joint German‐French effort. The solution is derived solely from analysis of satellite orbit perturbations, i.e. independent of oceanic and continental surface gravity data. EIGEN‐1S results in a geoid with an approximation error of about 20 cm in terms of 5 × 5 degree block mean values, which is an improvement of more than a factor of 2 compared to pre‐CHAMP satellite‐only gravity field models. This impressive progress is a result of CHAMP's tailored orbit characteristics and dedicated instrumentation, providing continuous tracking and direct on‐orbit measurements of non‐gravitational satellite accelerations.

For many years, the time community has been using the precise point positioning (PPP) technique which uses GPS phase and code observations to compute time and frequency links. However, progress in atomic clocks implies that the performance of PPP frequency comparisons is a limiting factor in comparing the best frequency standards. We show that a PPP technique where the integer nature of phase ambiguities is preserved consitutes significant improvement of the classical use of floating ambiguities. We demonstrate that this integer-PPP technique allows frequency comparisons with 1 × 10 −16 accuracy in a few days and can be readily operated with existing products.

No abstract

No abstract

Summary We have used more than 8 years’ worth of a combination of superconducting gravimeter (SG) data from the Strasbourg station and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) Earth orientation data in order to determine the gravimetric factor at the Chandler period of 435 days. The method presented here takes advantage of the relation between the rotational potential and the gravity variation at the Earth’s surface. The length of the data set is a critical parameter in such a determination but appears to be long enough to separate the annual and Chandler components. Our results are in a good agreement with the long‐period theoretical gravimetric factor relative to an elastic solid earth model and a static pole tide in the oceans. We also find that the effect of the atmosphere (computed from a global atmospheric model assuming a static response of the oceans to air‐pressure changes) is not negligible and perturbs the amplitude of the Chandler wave observed in the gravimetric data.