Summary 1.One of the most pervasive concepts in the study of community assembly is the metaphor of the environmental filter, which refers to abiotic factors that prevent the establishment or persistence of species in a particular location. The metaphor has its origins in the study of community change during succession and in plant community dynamics, although it has gained considerable attention recently as part of a surge of interest in functional trait and phylogenetic-based approaches to the study of communities. 2. While the filtering metaphor has clear utility in some circumstances, it has been challenging to reconcile the environmental filtering concept with recent developments in ecological theory related to species coexistence. These advances suggest that the evidence used in many studies to assess environmental filtering is insufficient to distinguish filtering from the outcome of biotic interactions. 3. We re-examine the environmental filtering metaphor from the perspective of coexistence theory. In an effort to move the discussion forward, we present a simple framework for considering the role of the environment in shaping community membership, review the literature to document the evidence typically used in environmental filtering studies and highlight research challenges to address in coming years. 4. The current usage of the environmental filtering term in empirical studies likely overstates the role abiotic tolerances play in shaping community structure. We recommend that the term 'environmental filtering' only be used to refer to cases where the abiotic environment prevents establishment or persistence in the absence of biotic interactions, although only 15% of the studies in our review presented such evidence. Finally, we urge community ecologists to consider additional mechanisms aside from environmental filtering by which the abiotic environment can shape community pattern.

Comparison of early shell morphological features of six mytilids from the northwestern Atlantic revealed differences useful for species identification and classification.Brachidontes exustus, lschadium recurvum, Geukensia demissa, Amygdalum papyrium, Mytilus edulis, and Modiolus modiolus larvae and post-larvae were cultured in the laboratory. Scanning electron micrographs of the shell and hinge during early ontogenetic stages showed that all species had a long provinculum with taxodont dentition. In addition, provinculum length and number of teeth increased during the larval period in the six species. The small, numerous provincular teeth of Mytilus edulis and the bold, comparatively few provincular teeth of Amygdalum papyrium clearly differentiated these two species. Most species had a low umbo, round posterior margin, and more pointed anterior margin, although Amygdalum papyrium was distinguished by a high, prominent umbo. Distinction of Geukensia demissa and lschadium recurvum larval shells was difficult due to similarity in their shapes and hinge dentition. However, discriminant analysis using larval shell length, shell height, provinculum length, and number of teeth aided in classification of these and other sympatric species.Presence and type of lateral teeth plainly distinguished the six species during postlarval development. Brachidontes exustus had all three types of mytilid lateral teeth, including primary lateral teeth, which formed immediately posterior to provincular teeth; secondary lateral teeth, which were posterior to the primary lateral teeth and were part of the dissoconch; and dysodont teeth, which formed on the anterior margin of the dissoconch. Modiolus modiolus had primary lateral teeth; lschadium recurvum had dysodont teeth; and Mytilus edulis had secondary lateral and dysodont teeth; whereas no lateral teeth formed in Geukensia demissa or Amygdalum papyrium during early post-larval development. The provinculum increased in size and complexity during post-larval development in Amygdalum papyrium, Brachidontes exustus, Geukensia demissa, lschadium recurvum, and Modiolus modiolus, but not in Mytilus edulis.

Series of sequences of SEM micrographs are presented to elucidate species-specific shell features in larval and post-larval stages of four Ostreidae (Bivalvia) species (Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg), C. virginica (Gmelin), Ostrea edulis L., and O. equestris Say). The diagnostic characters, including hinge structure, shell shape, and the dimensions of the prodissoconch, are identified and summarized in a key at both generic and species levels. In larval Crassostrea the skewed, backwards-pointed umboned shells with two hinge teeth on each side of the provinculum are significantly different from the round, dorsally-directed umboned shell with fewer, remarkably asymmetric teeth of larval Ostrea.In C. gigas the dimensions of the provinculum are longer and narrower (56x10 µrn) than those of C. virginica (50x14 µm); the lengths of prodissoconch I and the provinculum are greater in O. edulis (168 µm and 86 µm, respectively) than in O. equestris (120 µm and 74 µm, respectively). The present study suggests that precise quantitative measurements are needed for differentiation of the studied congeneric oyster species.

No abstract

No abstract