A substantial minority of early breast cancer (EBC) patients relapse despite their tumors achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. We compared gene expression (BC360; nCounter® platform; NanoString) between primary tumors of patients with post-pCR relapse (N = 14) with: (i) matched recurrent tumors from same patient (intraindividual analysis); and (ii) primary tumors from matched controls with pCR and no relapse (N = 41; interindividual analysis). Intraindividual analysis showed lower estrogen receptor signaling signature expression in recurrent tumors versus primaries (logFC = −0.595; P = 0.022). Recurrent tumors in patients with distant metastases also exhibited reduced expression of immune-related expression parameters. In interindividual analyses, primary tumor major histocompatibility complex class II expression was lower versus controls in patients with any relapse (logFC = −0.819; P = 0.030) or distant relapse (logFC = −1.151; P = 0.013). Primaries with later distant relapse also had greater homologous recombination deficiency than controls (logFC = 0.649; P = 0.026). Although no associations remained statistically significant following adjustment for false discovery rate, our results show that transcriptomic analyses have potential for prognostic value and may help in selecting optimal treatment regimens for EBC at risk of relapse and warrant further investigation.
ImportanceThe increasing use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) has led to substantial pathological complete response rates in patients with initially node-positive, early breast cancer, thereby questioning the need for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is feasible for axillary staging; however, data on oncological safety are scarce.ObjectiveTo assess 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with node-positive breast cancer who underwent TAD alone or TAD with ALND.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe SenTa study is a prospective registry study and was conducted between January 2017 and October 2018. The registry includes 50 study centers in Germany. Patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer underwent clipping of the most suspicious lymph node (LN) before NST. After NST, the marked LNs and sentinel LNs were excised (TAD) followed by ALND according to the clinician’s choice. Patients who did not undergo TAD were excluded. Data analysis was performed in April 2022 after 43 months of follow-up.ExposureTAD alone vs TAD with ALND.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThree-year clinical outcomes were evaluated.ResultsOf 199 female patients, the median (IQR) age was 52 (45-60) years. A total of 182 patients (91.5%) had 1 to 3 suspicious LNs; 119 received TAD alone and 80 received TAD with ALND. Unadjusted invasive disease-free survival was 82.4% (95% CI, 71.5-89.4) in the TAD with ALND group and 91.2% (95% CI, 84.2-95.1) in the TAD alone group (P = .04); axillary recurrence rates were 1.4% (95% CI, 0-54.8) and 1.8% (95% CI, 0-36.4), respectively (P = .56). Adjusted multivariate Cox regression indicated that TAD alone was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.34-2.05; P = .69) or death (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.31-3.70; P = .91). Similar results were obtained for 152 patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer after NST (invasive disease-free survival: HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.27-5.87; P = .77; overall survival: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.15-3.83; P = .74).Conclusions and RelevanceThese results suggest that TAD alone in patients with mostly good clinical response to NST and at least 3 TAD LNs may confer survival outcomes and recurrence rates similar to TAD with ALND.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) followed by matched therapy has opened up new therapeutic options to patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Here we report our experience with this approach in everyday clinical practice. This retrospective study included 95 patients with mBC who were genotyped with the FoundationOne® (CDx) assay in a commercial molecular pathology laboratory. Genetic alterations were identified in all tumor specimens, and 83 patients (87.4%) had a median of 2 (range, 1–6) potentially actionable alterations. A multidisciplinary tumor board recommended genomically guided therapy to 63 patients, 30 of whom received such treatment. Everolimus (n = 15) and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy (n = 6) were most frequently administered. The ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) under NGS-based therapy to PFS under the last line of standard therapy prior to NGS was >1.3 in 13 (43.3%) patients, indicative of a clinical benefit to NGS-directed therapy. One-year overall survival rates were 22.7% (95% CI, 6.5–44.4) in 65 patients allocated to the standard therapy versus 62.9% (95% CI, 41.6–78.2) in 30 patients receiving the matched therapy. In conclusion, NGS-matched treatment improved the clinical outcomes in a subgroup of mBC patients.
Background: Data on the oncologic safety of omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in node positive (N+) patients who downstage to ypN0 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is sparse. Additionally, there is no consensus on which axillary staging procedure should be used in this setting, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone or in combination with localization and retrieval of the clipped positive node, also known as targeted axillary dissection (TAD). Whether the reduction in the false negative rate observed with TAD translates into a significant reduction in the rate of axillary recurrence is unknown. We sought to evaluate oncologic outcomes after omission of ALND in a large, real-world cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients and to compare rates of axillary recurrence after SLNB with dual tracer mapping vs. TAD. Methods: Data were collected from 19 centers in the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium (OPBC) and EUBREAST networks. Patients with T1-4 biopsy-proven N1-3 BC who underwent NAC followed by axillary staging with either SLNB with dual tracer mapping or TAD and who were pathologically node negative (ypN0) were included. ypN0 was defined as the absence of any tumor or isolated tumor cells. Competing risk analysis was performed to assess the cumulative incidence rates of axillary recurrence, locoregional recurrence, and any invasive (locoregional or distant) recurrence. Two-year cumulative incidence rates were compared between TAD and SLNB using the Gray’s test. Type I error rate was set to 0.05 (α). Results: We included 785 patients (565 treated with SLNB and 220 with TAD) treated with NAC followed by surgery from 01/2014-12/2020. Median patient age was 50 years. The majority (57%) of patients had clinical T2 tumors, and 95% had N1 disease. Most (55%) were HER2+, and 21% were triple negative. Most patients (81%) received anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens, but NAC regimens differed between patients treated with TAD and those treated with SLNB (Table 1). All patients with HER2+ tumors received anti HER2 therapy. Nodal radiotherapy was administered to 76% of patients, and was more common in patients who underwent TAD (82% TAD vs 74% SLNB, p=0.017). Breast pathologic complete response (ypT0/is) was more frequent among those patients that had TAD (80% TAD vs. 66% SLNB, p< 0.001). TAD localization was with wire in 46%, radioactive seed in 40%, ultrasound in 5%, tattoo in 2%, and with a combination of these techniques in 7%. The clipped node was successfully retrieved in 94% of TAD cases. The median number of lymph nodes removed was lower in the TAD group compared to the SLNB group [3 (IQR 3-5) vs 4 IQR 3-5), p< 0.001], as was the median number of sentinel lymph nodes [3 (IQR 2-4) vs 4 IQR 3-5), p< 0.001] (Table 1). The 5-year rates of any axillary recurrence, locoregional recurrence, and any invasive recurrence in the entire cohort were 1.1% (95%CI 0.39-2.4%), 3.1% (95%CI 1.6-5.3%) and 10% (95%CI 7.6-13%), respectively. The two-year cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence did not differ between patients treated with TAD compared to SLNB (0% vs 0.9%, p=0.19). Conclusion: Early axillary recurrence after omission of ALND in patients who successfully downstage from N+ to ypN0 with NAC is a rare event following both SLNB or TAD, and was not significantly lower in TAD than SLNB. Although longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings, the main advantage of TAD seems to be a reduction in the number of lymph nodes removed. Overall, these results support omission of ALND in patients who successfully downstage to node negative disease after NAC. Table 1: Clinicopathological Features of the Study Cohort, Stratified by Axillary Staging Technique Citation Format: Giacomo Montagna, Mary Mrdutt, Astrid Botty, Andrea V. Barrio, Varadan Sevilimedu, Judy C. Boughey, Tanya L. Hoskin, Laura H. Rosenberger, E Shelley Hwang, Abigail Ingham, Bärbel Papassotiropoulos, Bich Doan Nguyen-Sträuli, Christian Kurzeder, Danilo Diaz Aybar, Denise Vorburger, Dieter Michael Matlac, Edvin Ostapenko, Fabian Riedel, Florian Fitzal, Francesco Meani, Franziska Fick, Jacqueline Sagasser, Jörg Heil, Konstantin J. Dedes, Laszlo Romics, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Maria Del Rosario Cueva Perez, Marcelo Chavez Diaz, Martin Heidinger, Mathias K. Fehr, Mattea Reinisch, Nadia Maggi, Nicola Rocco, Nina Ditsch, Oreste Davide Gentilini, Regis Resende Paulinelli, Sebastian Sole Zarhi, Sherko Küemmel, Simona Bruzas, Simona Di Lascio, Tamara Parissenti, Uwe Güth, Valentina Ovalle, Christoph Tausch, Monica Morrow, Thorsten Kühn, Walter P. Weber. Oncological Outcomes Following Omission of Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Node Positive Patients Downstaging To Node Negative with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: the OPBC-04/EUBREAST-06/OMA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-02.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.