СТРАНИЦЫ ИСТОРИИ М.С. Доброхотов был одним из наиболее известных воспитанников московской неврологической школы [1] (рис. 1), с именем которого связаны организация медицинского образования и психоневрологической помощи в нашей стране. М.С. Доброхотов родился 25 мая (6 июня) 1878 г. в Кронштадте в семье приват-доцента Московского университета и преподавательницы английского языка [2]. Среднее образование он получил в одном из самых престижных учебных заведений Москвы-Третьей гимназии, после окончания которой поступил в Московский императорский университет, где в 1903 г. ему было присвоено звание лекаря. Здесь его наставником стал один из создателей российской научной школы невропатологов В.К. Рот [3]. 7 февраля 1905 г. М.С. Доброхотов был зачислен на должность сверхштатного ординатора при клинике нервных болезней [4], а 4 февраля 1906 г. переведен на место штатного ординатора той же клиники Московского университета [5]. Впоследствии он вспоминал: «По требованию профессора В.К. Рота был полгода экстерном терапевтической клиники проф. В.Д. Шервинского, а с января 1904 г. зачислен экстерном клиники нервных болезней проф. В.К. Рота. С 1905 по 1908 г. был ординатором указанной клиники, сначала сверхштатным, а потом штатным» [6]. По рекомендации В.К. Рота в «Журнале невропатологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова» были опубликованы пер
The article deals with the events related to the development of the coronavirus pandemic in the countries of the South Caucasus. The author pays attention to the spread of the disease in Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, the measures taken by the state authorities against the epidemic. A large place is devoted to the demonstrations of citizens against anti-COVID restrictions. In addition, the process of vaccination and the resistance to the latter on the part of citizens, expressed in crowded rallies, are considered. All this together led to an increase in social tension in the region. However, in each of the states of the South Caucasus the considered processes had their own characteristics.
The article deals with the historiography of the 18 th century (the last quarter) anti-Russian movement in the North Caucasus. The author analyzes the research methods and twritten sources, historians used to form their conclusions. In the study of the Sheikh Mansour activities, one has four basic chronological periods which reveal predominant attention to a certain group of historical sources. First, come the contemporary memoirs about Sheikh Mansur. The next group form the results obtained by the Russian military who sought to achieve various practical goals. The historians of the Imperial period were interested in the details and chronology of the uprising. Separately the author of the article treats the hitherto unknown archival records and data.
The article reveals the main stages of the life path of the last Karanogay manager Philip Iosifovich Kapelgorodsky (1882–1938) – a person whose merits in the arrangement of the Nogai steppe at the beginning of the XX century are unfairly forgotten. The little-studied aspects of his activities as an imperial administrator are highlighted with the involvement of archival data and memoirs. Separate episodes from the biography of F.I. Kapelgorodsky, which determined the turns of his life. His significant contribution to the organization of education in the Nogai steppe, the study and description of the culture, customs, way of life of the Nogais is indicated. A brief description and analysis of his activities during the Soviet period is also given. In addition, the track record of F.I. Kapelgorodsky in 1915, extracted from the funds of the Russian State Military Historical Ar-chive, which allows us to clarify some biographical data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.